Adolescent Mental Healthcare as a Public Utility: A Multi-Sectoral Economic Case for Proactive Investment
Abstract
Adolescence is a critical developmental period marked by substantial neuroplasticity and the onset of most psychiatric disorders. Despite this epidemiologic reality, the current US mental healthcare landscape remains largely reactive rather than proactive, leaving nearly half of symptomatic youth untreated and generating a considerable economic burden through lost productivity and increased healthcare expenditures. While clinical outcomes are well-documented, the multi-sectoral fiscal consequences and potential returns on investment of such proactive youth mental healthcare remain poorly integrated into US policy frameworks.
This narrative review synthesizes evidence from econometric analyses and longitudinal studies across four key sectors: education, legal and correctional, labor market (caregiver productivity), and healthcare. We describe how untreated mental health conditions contribute to high-cost, crisis-driven care, chronic school absenteeism, and increased involvement with the juvenile correctional system, while also quantifying their effects on caregiver workforce participation and productivity. Furthermore, we highlight emerging public financing models that conceptualize mental healthcare as an essential public good.
Current evidence suggests that proactive investment in accessible adolescent mental healthcare yields meaningful socioeconomic returns. Strategic investment in youth mental healthcare should therefore be regarded as both a public health imperative and a fiscal priority.
Related
- Global return-on-investment of COVID-19 vaccines in the first year of the vaccination programme: A model-based economic evaluation
- Climate risk or healthcare investment? Explaining oral health outcomes across European Union member states
- Digital health literacy, proactive health behaviours, the digital healthcare environment and health-related quality of life among older adults with type 2 diabetes in Chinese primary care: a cross-sectional study
- Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in a healthcare facility: issues and economic impacts
- Direct and indirect costs as barriers to maternal healthcare utilization among adolescent mothers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
BibTeX
@misc{swirbul2026adolescent,
title = {{Adolescent Mental Healthcare as a Public Utility: A Multi-Sectoral Economic Case for Proactive Investment}},
author = {Mackenzie Swirbul and Emily Peake and Anne Bischops and Marie-Laure Charpignon and Maimuna S. Majumder and Aarthi Padmanabhan},
howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.31234/osf.io/qm8sz_v1},
url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/qm8sz_v1/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Adolescent Mental Healthcare as a Public Utility: A Multi-Sectoral Economic Case for Proactive Investment
AU - Mackenzie Swirbul
AU - Emily Peake
AU - Anne Bischops
AU - Marie-Laure Charpignon
AU - Maimuna S. Majumder
AU - Aarthi Padmanabhan
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/26
PB - PsyArXiv
DO - 10.31234/osf.io/qm8sz_v1
UR - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/qm8sz_v1/
AB - Adolescence is a critical developmental period marked by substantial neuroplasticity and the onset of most psychiatric disorders. Despite this epidemiologic reality, the current US mental healthcare landscape remains largely reactive rather than proactive, leaving nearly half of symptomatic youth untreated and generating a considerable economic burden through lost productivity and increased healthcare expenditures. While clinical outcomes are well-documented, the multi-sectoral fiscal consequences and potential returns on investment of such proactive youth mental healthcare remain poorly integrated into US policy frameworks. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from econometric analyses and longitudinal studies across four key sectors: education, legal and correctional, labor market (caregiver productivity), and healthcare. We describe how untreated mental health conditions contribute to high-cost, crisis-driven care, chronic school absenteeism, and increased involvement with the juvenile correctional system, while also quantifying their effects on caregiver workforce participation and productivity. Furthermore, we highlight emerging public financing models that conceptualize mental healthcare as an essential public good. Current evidence suggests that proactive investment in accessible adolescent mental healthcare yields meaningful socioeconomic returns. Strategic investment in youth mental healthcare should therefore be regarded as both a public health imperative and a fiscal priority.
ER -