Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,642 studies31 sourcesUpdated 14 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Clinical Medicine

Development and Internal Validation of the MELD–ERT Score for Mortality Risk Stratification After Liver Transplantation

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Medical Point Hospital, İzmir University of Economics, İzmir 35575, Türkiye

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score reflects pretransplant disease severity, but does not capture intraoperative factors that may influence post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a composite MELD–erythrocyte transfusion (ERT) score for mortality risk stratification after liver transplantation (LT). Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 125 adult LT recipients between August 2024 and July 2026. A MELD–ERT score (0–2) was constructed using ROC-derived cut-offs for MELD and intraoperative ERT. Prognostic performance for mortality and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using regression, conventional and time-dependent ROC and survival analyses, with bootstrap internal validation. Results: During a median follow-up of 544 days, 30 patients (24.0%) died. MELD and ERT were independently associated with mortality. Mortality increased stepwise across MELD–ERT scores of 0, 1, and 2 (0%, 36.2%, and 59.1%, respectively). The MELD–ERT score showed good discrimination (AUC 0.836, 95% CI 0.776–0.897), with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.818 after bootstrap validation. Its discrimination was comparable to MELD alone (p = 0.660) and superior to ERT alone (p = 0.002). Time-dependent AUCs for MELD–ERT were 0.893, 0.930, 0.837, and 0.812 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. OS differed significantly across score categories (log-rank p < 0.001), and high-risk patients had a 9.7-month shorter 24-month RMST (95% CI 5.4–14.3; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MELD–ERT score provides a simple approach to post-LT mortality risk stratification and demonstrated good discrimination after internal validation. However, it did not significantly outperform MELD alone. External validation is warranted.

Related

  1. Development and Internal Validation of a Preoperative Risk Stratification Model for Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis
    Sinan Aslan, Şebnem Çimen
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Development and Prospective Internal-Validation Protocol of the SpinePROTECT Score: A Digital Biopsychosocial Risk Stratification Framework for Spine Surgery.
    Christian Riediger, Mark Ferl, Christoph H Lohmann +1
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
  3. Factors associated with postoperative ileus after laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer and development and internal validation of a postoperative risk-stratification nomogram
    Duoqin Qin, Weipeng Zhu, Jun Gong +5
    Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive TechniquesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJPMC
  4. Development and internal validation of a simple risk stratification score for unplanned emergency department revisits within 24 hours after discharge: A retrospective observational study
    Hidetaka Onda, Yuma Kuramatsu, Toyoaki Yamamoto +8
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyImmunologyPLOS
  5. Development and internal validation of an interpretable mammography-based model for malignancy risk stratification in BI-RADS 4 breast lesions
    Yanheng Zhang, Nan Ding, Tingting Jiao +1
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{cetin2026development,
  title = {{Development and Internal Validation of the MELD–ERT Score for Mortality Risk Stratification After Liver Transplantation}},
  author = {Bartu Çetin and Murat Zeytunlu},
  journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15207903},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7903},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and Internal Validation of the MELD–ERT Score for Mortality Risk Stratification After Liver Transplantation
AU  - Bartu Çetin
AU  - Murat Zeytunlu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Journal of Clinical Medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15207903
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/15/20/7903
AB  - Background/Objectives: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score reflects pretransplant disease severity, but does not capture intraoperative factors that may influence post-transplant outcomes. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a composite MELD–erythrocyte transfusion (ERT) score for mortality risk stratification after liver transplantation (LT). Methods: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 125 adult LT recipients between August 2024 and July 2026. A MELD–ERT score (0–2) was constructed using ROC-derived cut-offs for MELD and intraoperative ERT. Prognostic performance for mortality and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using regression, conventional and time-dependent ROC and survival analyses, with bootstrap internal validation. Results: During a median follow-up of 544 days, 30 patients (24.0%) died. MELD and ERT were independently associated with mortality. Mortality increased stepwise across MELD–ERT scores of 0, 1, and 2 (0%, 36.2%, and 59.1%, respectively). The MELD–ERT score showed good discrimination (AUC 0.836, 95% CI 0.776–0.897), with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.818 after bootstrap validation. Its discrimination was comparable to MELD alone (p = 0.660) and superior to ERT alone (p = 0.002). Time-dependent AUCs for MELD–ERT were 0.893, 0.930, 0.837, and 0.812 at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. OS differed significantly across score categories (log-rank p < 0.001), and high-risk patients had a 9.7-month shorter 24-month RMST (95% CI 5.4–14.3; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The MELD–ERT score provides a simple approach to post-LT mortality risk stratification and demonstrated good discrimination after internal validation. However, it did not significantly outperform MELD alone. External validation is warranted.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -