Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,220 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Partially Correlated Verifier Cascades in LLM Harnesses: Concave Log-Odds, Polynomial Reliability, and Blind-Spot Ceilings

Abstract

Serial verification gates are a core reliability primitive in LLM harnesses: a candidate answer is returned only if k verifier calls all accept it. Under conditionally independent gates, the recent Odds Law (arXiv:2606.15712) shows that posterior log-odds grow linearly in k, so failure decays exponentially, and states that "a tight theory of partially correlated verifier cascades remains open." This note gives a minimal such theory. Modeling the per-instance false-accept rate on the generator's own errors as a latent variable α∼ G (de Finetti), the exact cascade posterior is ℓk = ℓ0 − ln mk, with mk the k-th moment of G. Then: (i) ℓk is concave in k for every non-degenerate G -- the Odds Law is its tangent at the first gate and an upper bound; (ii) for Beta(a,b) latents, failure decays polynomially, 1−rk asymp k−b, with correlation parameter ρv = 1/(a+b+1); (iii) a blind-spot atom of mass 1−π at α=1 caps the evidence extractable from any number of gates at −ln(1−π) nats, so reliability saturates below 1; (iv) letting the true-accept rate also vary (β∼ H) yields a trichotomy -- gates eventually always help, plateau, or actively harm -- decided by the upper-tail exponents of G and H, with closed-form crossover k†. The mechanism is survivorship: errors surviving gates are the high-α ones. The theory is measurable: R repeated verdicts per instance identify the first R moments of G, so two verdicts identify ρv; beta-binomial likelihood and NPMLE recover the reliability curve and the ill-posed ceiling. In synthetic tests, independence-based extrapolation underestimates failure by 20x at k=5 and ~3000x at k=10; the correlated fit at R=8 tracks held-out depths. The practical lever is decorrelation -- changing model family, modality, or evidence source -- not adding gates.

Related

  1. Valid Stopping in Adaptive Generator-Verifier Loops
    Mahmoud Hegazy, Michael I. Jordan, Aymeric Dieuleveut
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. Verifier-Guided Synthetic Augmentation for 3D Human Shape Generation
    Yuexuan Wu, Yang Xiang, Hamid Laga +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Verifier-guided discovery of exact high-order mimetic operators with large language models
    J. de Curtò, I. de Zarzà
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  4. SILMARILS-MV: Information-Theoretically Secure Multi-Verifier Signatures with Dealer-Free Key Issuance and Linear Aggregation for Permissioned Blockchains
    Khadijeh Bagheri, Hassan Khodaiemehr, Chen Feng
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. SCATTERING OF WATER WAVES IN PRESENCE OF A PARTIALLY IMMERSED OBSTACLE
    Debayan Maity, Vicente Ocqueteau, Marius Tucsnak
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textGeneral mathematicsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{han2026partially,
  title = {{Partially Correlated Verifier Cascades in LLM Harnesses: Concave Log-Odds, Polynomial Reliability, and Blind-Spot Ceilings}},
  author = {Jiangang Han},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2607.13918},
  eprint = {2607.13918},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13918},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Partially Correlated Verifier Cascades in LLM Harnesses: Concave Log-Odds, Polynomial Reliability, and Blind-Spot Ceilings
AU  - Jiangang Han
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/15
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2607.13918
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13918
AB  - Serial verification gates are a core reliability primitive in LLM harnesses: a candidate answer is returned only if k verifier calls all accept it. Under conditionally independent gates, the recent Odds Law (arXiv:2606.15712) shows that posterior log-odds grow linearly in k, so failure decays exponentially, and states that "a tight theory of partially correlated verifier cascades remains open." This note gives a minimal such theory. Modeling the per-instance false-accept rate on the generator's own errors as a latent variable α∼ G (de Finetti), the exact cascade posterior is ℓ_k = ℓ_0 − ln m_k, with m_k the k-th moment of G. Then: (i) ℓ_k is concave in k for every non-degenerate G -- the Odds Law is its tangent at the first gate and an upper bound; (ii) for Beta(a,b) latents, failure decays polynomially, 1−r_k asymp k^−b, with correlation parameter ρ_v = 1/(a+b+1); (iii) a blind-spot atom of mass 1−π at α=1 caps the evidence extractable from any number of gates at −ln(1−π) nats, so reliability saturates below 1; (iv) letting the true-accept rate also vary (β∼ H) yields a trichotomy -- gates eventually always help, plateau, or actively harm -- decided by the upper-tail exponents of G and H, with closed-form crossover k^†. The mechanism is survivorship: errors surviving gates are the high-α ones. The theory is measurable: R repeated verdicts per instance identify the first R moments of G, so two verdicts identify ρ_v; beta-binomial likelihood and NPMLE recover the reliability curve and the ill-posed ceiling. In synthetic tests, independence-based extrapolation underestimates failure by 20x at k=5 and ~3000x at k=10; the correlated fit at R=8 tracks held-out depths. The practical lever is decorrelation -- changing model family, modality, or evidence source -- not adding gates.
ER  -