Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,541 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCureus

Brexpiprazole in India and the United States: A Comparative Review of Regulatory Status, Clinical Evidence, Market Access, and Evidence Gaps.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Psychiatry, New York Medical College, Saint Clare's Health, Denville, USA.
  2. 2Psychiatry, New York Medical College, St. Mary's General Hospital, Passaic, USA.
  3. 3Internal Medicine, Government Medical College, Patiala, IND.
  4. 4Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, IND.
  5. 5Psychiatry, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, IND.

Abstract

Brexpiprazole is a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator first cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015 for adults with schizophrenia and as an adjunct to antidepressants in major depressive disorder (MDD); later authorizations extended its use to adolescent schizophrenia and to agitation arising in dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Over the past decade, randomized controlled trials, long-term open-label extensions, and analyses of real-world claims have converged on a consistent efficacy profile and a tolerability profile that has generally been favorable, although direct head-to-head comparisons with other second-generation agents remain limited. The evidence base and access environment differ markedly between the two countries. In the United States, brexpiprazole is an established product with an extensive clinical evidence base supplemented by real-world claims, utilization, safety, and economic analyses. In contrast, India has only recently received regulatory approval for brexpiprazole, and brexpiprazole-specific clinical, real-world utilization, pricing, reimbursement, and pharmacoeconomic data remain limited. This narrative review consolidates the pharmacology, clinical-trial findings, safety record, and health-economic data on brexpiprazole and contrasts the mature evidence environment of the United States with the emerging one in India. The principal Indian evidence gap is therefore no longer regulatory recognition but the generation of local data on availability, affordability, utilization, effectiveness, and pharmacoeconomic value. Framed as a collaboration between Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, and New York Medical College at St Clare's and St Mary's, New Jersey, the review aims to support the equitable and evidence-based uptake of newer antipsychotics in emerging settings.

Related

  1. Accelerator-based BNCT as a drug–device regimen: system engineering, clinical evidence, and regulatory considerations
    Zehua Wang, Yue Wang, Yan Jiang +3
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossrefDOAJ
  2. Conditional approval of oncology medicines in Europe (2017–2022): evidence maturity, regulatory outcomes, clinical benefit and downstream access
    Mikel Urroz-Elizalde, Paloma Moraga-Alapont, María Jiménez-González +2
    Frontiers in PharmacologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossrefPMC
  3. Calcium-Modification Techniques in Calcified Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review of Comparative Evidence on Procedural Success, Complications and Clinical Outcomes
    Sundar Chidambaram, Manokar Panchanatham, Mahadevan Venkataramani +9
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  4. A comparative study on clinical efficacy between tension-free transtendon repair and conventional transtendon repair for partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion (PASTA) : Study design: retrospective comparative study; level of evidence, III.
    Zan Hu, Zefeng Zhang, Xiqi Zhuang +2
    BMC musculoskeletal disordersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMCPMC
  5. Interferential Current Therapy and Spray-And-Stretch in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms, Evidence, and Clinical Positioning in the Absence of Direct Comparative Trials.
    Chul Hee Jung, Seok Yeon Choi, Dong Ha Lee
    Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textPharmacology & toxicologyEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{gill2026brexpiprazole,
  title = {{Brexpiprazole in India and the United States: A Comparative Review of Regulatory Status, Clinical Evidence, Market Access, and Evidence Gaps.}},
  author = {Natasha Gill and Supreet K Sohi and Neena Bhatti and Girish Joseph and Pallavi Abhilasha},
  journal = {Cureus},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.7759/cureus.117032},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953479},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Brexpiprazole in India and the United States: A Comparative Review of Regulatory Status, Clinical Evidence, Market Access, and Evidence Gaps.
AU  - Natasha Gill
AU  - Supreet K Sohi
AU  - Neena Bhatti
AU  - Girish Joseph
AU  - Pallavi Abhilasha
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/27
JO  - Cureus
DO  - 10.7759/cureus.117032
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42953479
AB  - Brexpiprazole is a serotonin-dopamine activity modulator first cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2015 for adults with schizophrenia and as an adjunct to antidepressants in major depressive disorder (MDD); later authorizations extended its use to adolescent schizophrenia and to agitation arising in dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. Over the past decade, randomized controlled trials, long-term open-label extensions, and analyses of real-world claims have converged on a consistent efficacy profile and a tolerability profile that has generally been favorable, although direct head-to-head comparisons with other second-generation agents remain limited. The evidence base and access environment differ markedly between the two countries. In the United States, brexpiprazole is an established product with an extensive clinical evidence base supplemented by real-world claims, utilization, safety, and economic analyses. In contrast, India has only recently received regulatory approval for brexpiprazole, and brexpiprazole-specific clinical, real-world utilization, pricing, reimbursement, and pharmacoeconomic data remain limited. This narrative review consolidates the pharmacology, clinical-trial findings, safety record, and health-economic data on brexpiprazole and contrasts the mature evidence environment of the United States with the emerging one in India. The principal Indian evidence gap is therefore no longer regulatory recognition but the generation of local data on availability, affordability, utilization, effectiveness, and pharmacoeconomic value. Framed as a collaboration between Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, and New York Medical College at St Clare's and St Mary's, New Jersey, the review aims to support the equitable and evidence-based uptake of newer antipsychotics in emerging settings.
SN  - 2168-8184
ER  -