Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 49 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Feedback-Aware Tuning of Recursive Q-Learning

Abstract

Model choice in backward Q-learning is recursive because a later-stage choice changes the response supplied to an earlier regression and can alter its model-comparison statistic. Separate stagewise criteria do not directly assess the target-stage prediction risk of a completed Q-learning fit. We address this mismatch by treating the entire backward-fitting rule as the unit of comparison and propose feedback-aware soft tuning for sequential multiple assignment randomised trials. Each backward fit uses its own generated responses and is assessed at a common prediction target. The risk criterion retains downstream effects on upstream comparisons, while a separate correction accounts for estimating the final exponential weights from the same observations. For a fixed finite library of smooth recursive maps, we establish an exact risk identity under a Gaussian shift model and an oracle inequality with an explicit adaptation remainder. Under coordinate-representation and moment conditions, these guarantees transfer to prediction risk at any prespecified stage, with the number of stages fixed as sample size increases. A two-stage construction supplies an explicit observable implementation. Numerical studies examine risk estimation and finite-sample performance, and a simulated attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder trial illustrates the relation between comparison feedback and treatment recommendations.

Related

  1. Self-Supervised Tuning of Low-Fidelity Optimization Models via High-Fidelity Feedback
    Gonzalo E. Constante-Flores, André H. Quisaguano-Paredes, Asha Ramanujam +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. UQ-ACE: Stability-Aware Counterfactual Controller Tuning via Bayesian SINDy
    Margarita A. Guerrero, Rodrigo A. Gonzalez, Cristian R. Rojas
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Risk-Constrained MPPI Tuning with Update-Aware MA-ES Racing
    Morteza Kimiaei, Roya Khalili-Amirabadi, Mohsen Jalaeian-Farimani
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Tuning-Free Covariance-Aware Sequential Shrinkage for Multi-Source Estimation
    Wenbo Jing, Xi Chen, Yaqi Duan +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Cost-Aware Best-LLM Identification using Dueling Feedback
    Sarvesh Gharat, Nikhil Karamchandani, Jayakrishnan Nair
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kojima2026feedbackaware,
  title = {{Feedback-Aware Tuning of Recursive Q-Learning}},
  author = {Masahiro Kojima},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.12716},
  eprint = {2609.12716},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12716},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Feedback-Aware Tuning of Recursive Q-Learning
AU  - Masahiro Kojima
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/11
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.12716
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12716
AB  - Model choice in backward Q-learning is recursive because a later-stage choice changes the response supplied to an earlier regression and can alter its model-comparison statistic. Separate stagewise criteria do not directly assess the target-stage prediction risk of a completed Q-learning fit. We address this mismatch by treating the entire backward-fitting rule as the unit of comparison and propose feedback-aware soft tuning for sequential multiple assignment randomised trials. Each backward fit uses its own generated responses and is assessed at a common prediction target. The risk criterion retains downstream effects on upstream comparisons, while a separate correction accounts for estimating the final exponential weights from the same observations. For a fixed finite library of smooth recursive maps, we establish an exact risk identity under a Gaussian shift model and an oracle inequality with an explicit adaptation remainder. Under coordinate-representation and moment conditions, these guarantees transfer to prediction risk at any prespecified stage, with the number of stages fixed as sample size increases. A two-stage construction supplies an explicit observable implementation. Numerical studies examine risk estimation and finite-sample performance, and a simulated attention-deficit/hyperactivity-disorder trial illustrates the relation between comparison feedback and treatment recommendations.
ER  -