Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,948 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SASaudi journal of anaesthesia

Perioperative management of patients taking GLP-1 receptor agonists: A comparative review of international clinical guidelines.

  1. 1Department of Critical Care and Anaesthetics, St Richard's Hospital, Chichester, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
  2. 2Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, Norwich, Norfolk, and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

Abstract

GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are now routinely encountered in preoperative assessment. Their effect on gastric emptying raises concern about pulmonary aspiration risk during anesthesia. Five major professional bodies have published perioperative guidance since 2023, reaching divergent conclusions on four clinically important questions. A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, professional society websites, and grey literature was conducted for perioperative GLP-1 RA guidelines published between January 2023 and March 2026. Five documents met eligibility criteria. Each was independently appraised by two reviewers using the AGREE-REX framework, and primary studies underpinning the guidelines were reviewed for four pre-specified clinical questions. Four of five guidelines now recommend drug continuation with structured fasting modification, superseding the 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) cessation policy. Fasting protocols diverge substantially: SPAQI 2025 uniquely distinguishes high-calorie from low-calorie liquids. Three of five documents explicitly state that absence of gastrointestinal symptoms cannot be relied upon for risk stratification. All five guidelines endorse gastric ultrasound but none define validated decision thresholds. AGREE-REX appraisal identified the Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI)/Royal College of Anesthetists (RCoA) 2025 statement as having the broadest multidisciplinary representation and the most transparent process; Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) 2025 had the most rigorous evidence base but the most complex implementation requirements. Endocrinologist and obesity medicine representation is absent from most authoring groups, and the recommendations reflect this. International guidelines share a direction, to continue with modified fasting, but the operational details remain contested. The clinical risks of incomplete gastric emptying, hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent patients, and the absence of validated gastric ultrasound decision thresholds are not yet adequately reflected in most guidance. Prospective outcome data capturing aspiration events and glycemic complications remain urgently needed.

Related

  1. Guidelines: Diagnosis and management of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions 2025
    Mertes Paul Michel, Chiriac Anca, Tacquard Charles +23
    Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyHALHAL
  2. Interpretation and insights into Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026:transitioning from standardized management to precision-tailored therapy
    WANG Lei, GE Xin, ZHAO Mingyan
    Zhongguo linchuang yanjiuPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  3. 8th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC8 guidelines)
    Fatima Cardoso, Joana Mourato Ribeiro, Eva Schumacher-Wulf +50
    The Breast : Official Journal of the European Society of MastologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textOncologyPMCEurope PMC
  4. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of perioperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions 2025
    Paul Michel Mertès, Anca Chiriac, Charles Tacquard +23
    Journal of Allergy and Hypersensitivity DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyHAL
  5. International expert consensus on perioperative management of carcinoid crisis
    Julie Hallet, Fahad Alam, Stefano Partelli +46
    BJS OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{moore2026perioperative,
  title = {{Perioperative management of patients taking GLP-1 receptor agonists: A comparative review of international clinical guidelines.}},
  author = {Thomas Moore and Benjamin Ramsahoye},
  journal = {Saudi journal of anaesthesia},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.4103/sja.sja_314_26},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42960088},
  note = {CC BY-NC-SA},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Perioperative management of patients taking GLP-1 receptor agonists: A comparative review of international clinical guidelines.
AU  - Thomas Moore
AU  - Benjamin Ramsahoye
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Saudi journal of anaesthesia
DO  - 10.4103/sja.sja_314_26
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42960088
AB  - GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are now routinely encountered in preoperative assessment. Their effect on gastric emptying raises concern about pulmonary aspiration risk during anesthesia. Five major professional bodies have published perioperative guidance since 2023, reaching divergent conclusions on four clinically important questions. A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, professional society websites, and grey literature was conducted for perioperative GLP-1 RA guidelines published between January 2023 and March 2026. Five documents met eligibility criteria. Each was independently appraised by two reviewers using the AGREE-REX framework, and primary studies underpinning the guidelines were reviewed for four pre-specified clinical questions. Four of five guidelines now recommend drug continuation with structured fasting modification, superseding the 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) cessation policy. Fasting protocols diverge substantially: SPAQI 2025 uniquely distinguishes high-calorie from low-calorie liquids. Three of five documents explicitly state that absence of gastrointestinal symptoms cannot be relied upon for risk stratification. All five guidelines endorse gastric ultrasound but none define validated decision thresholds. AGREE-REX appraisal identified the Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI)/Royal College of Anesthetists (RCoA) 2025 statement as having the broadest multidisciplinary representation and the most transparent process; Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) 2025 had the most rigorous evidence base but the most complex implementation requirements. Endocrinologist and obesity medicine representation is absent from most authoring groups, and the recommendations reflect this. International guidelines share a direction, to continue with modified fasting, but the operational details remain contested. The clinical risks of incomplete gastric emptying, hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent patients, and the absence of validated gastric ultrasound decision thresholds are not yet adequately reflected in most guidance. Prospective outcome data capturing aspiration events and glycemic complications remain urgently needed.
SN  - 1658-354X
SN  - 0975-3125
ER  -