Global warming and the National Cattlemen’s Association 1986–1996
- 1Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States of America
- 2Leonard and Jayne Abess Center for Ecosystem Science and Policy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States of America
Abstract
In the mid-1980s, scientific studies first highlighted the role of anthropogenic methane in global warming and emissions from cows as an important source. This knowledge expanded views of responsibility for global warming beyond the fossil fuel sector. Using scientific studies, archival documents, media interviews, and various government reports, we analyzed how the National Cattlemen’s Association (NCA), a trade association for the U.S beef industry, reacted to news about its products’ impacts on global warming between 1986 and 1996. While previous studies have emphasized the role of trade associations in political lobbying, here we show that NCA responded mainly with strategic communications, including information gathering on civil society activities, commissioning academic experts to produce and share statistics that reframed scientific findings, and discursive tactics to influence politicians and the public. Despite scientific recommendations about opportunities to reduce methane emissions, we found no evidence that NCA researched or promoted any of these suggested changes to beef production. Instead, NCA treated global warming as a public relations concern that could affect consumer demand, rather than as a potentially serious consequence of beef production.
Related
- Warming, thermal variability, and the 96% decline in childhood respiratory-infection mortality in China: a national time-series analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 and the C-LSAT high-resolution climate dataset
- Protective effects of heat shock protein 70 induction against global warming by using oriental bezoar and ginseng
- Global Warming and Type 2 Diabetes: Sex and Gender as Drivers in a Multidimensional Feedback Loop.
- The urgent need to adapt working conditions to global warming-driven heat waves to protect workers’ health
- Spatiotemporal burden, dietary risk factors, and genetic causality of high body mass index on low back pain : A global, regional, and national analysis based on multi-source databases
BibTeX
@article{jacquet2026global,
title = {{Global warming and the National Cattlemen’s Association 1986–1996}},
author = {Jennifer Jacquet and Loredana Loy},
journal = {PLOS Climate},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pclm.0001061},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0001061},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Global warming and the National Cattlemen’s Association 1986–1996
AU - Jennifer Jacquet
AU - Loredana Loy
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - PLOS Climate
DO - 10.1371/journal.pclm.0001061
UR - https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0001061
AB - In the mid-1980s, scientific studies first highlighted the role of anthropogenic methane in global warming and emissions from cows as an important source. This knowledge expanded views of responsibility for global warming beyond the fossil fuel sector. Using scientific studies, archival documents, media interviews, and various government reports, we analyzed how the National Cattlemen’s Association (NCA), a trade association for the U.S beef industry, reacted to news about its products’ impacts on global warming between 1986 and 1996. While previous studies have emphasized the role of trade associations in political lobbying, here we show that NCA responded mainly with strategic communications, including information gathering on civil society activities, commissioning academic experts to produce and share statistics that reframed scientific findings, and discursive tactics to influence politicians and the public. Despite scientific recommendations about opportunities to reduce methane emissions, we found no evidence that NCA researched or promoted any of these suggested changes to beef production. Instead, NCA treated global warming as a public relations concern that could affect consumer demand, rather than as a potentially serious consequence of beef production.
SN - 2767-3200
ER -