Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,226 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

The Transformative Side of Societal Stress: Threat and Challenge Responses to Progressive Social Changes

Abstract

Research showed that social changes elicit threat, which is considered a negative response to be avoided to improve intergroup relations. However, this approach overlooks the transformative potential of positive stress (challenge) for progressive social changes. To address this gap, we investigated whether, and if so, under what conditions, social change is perceived as threatening or challenging. Results from a representative Dutch sample (N = 411) revealed that social change is more threatening than the status quo. Furthermore, the instrumental (vs. symbolic) aspects of change, and its perceived demands and uncertainty heighten threat, while the ingroup and system (vs. personal) dimensions of change, and social resources and support buffer against threat. Our results offer insight into what factors promote more adaptive (challenge) rather than maladaptive (threat) responses to social changes. They encourage a critical perspective on social change, framing threat not as inherently negative but as tensions to be navigated.

Related

  1. P004 Progressive insufficiency fractures and structural foot collapse associated with methotrexate: a case report with evidence of re-challenge and de-challenge effect
    Heba Fahmy, Gillian Roberts
    Rheumatology advances in practicePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCPMC
  2. Qualitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Time–Intensity Curve Analysis for Differentiating Non-Progressive Treatment-Related Changes from Tumor Progression After Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases
    Andrea Romano, Giulia Moltoni, Anna Maria Ascolese +8
    CancersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Progressive Cyclic Oculomotor Nerve Palsy: An Update Focusing on Accommodation and Visual Acuity Changes
    Michael S Salman, Elizabeth Carson, Ian H Clark
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeurologyObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMC
  4. Dynamics of Airway Macrophage Responses and Lung Function Changes after Ozone Exposure in Humans
    Jared Radbel, Emily R. Stevenson, Raymond C. Rancourt +9
    American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textPharmacology & toxicologyPMC
  5. Trajectory of Psychological Adaptation During an 8-Day Fast: Changes in Subjective Well-Being, Mood, and Neuroendocrine Responses
    Karol Pilis, Krzysztof Stec, Wiesław Pilis +4
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0NutritionCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{colombo2026transformative,
  title = {{The Transformative Side of Societal Stress: Threat and Challenge Responses to Progressive Social Changes}},
  author = {Marty Colombo and Félice van Nunspeet and Daan Scheepers},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/3yza5_v2},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/3yza5_v2/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - The Transformative Side of Societal Stress: Threat and Challenge Responses to Progressive Social Changes
AU  - Marty Colombo
AU  - Félice van Nunspeet
AU  - Daan Scheepers
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/3yza5_v2
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/3yza5_v2/
AB  - Research showed that social changes elicit threat, which is considered a negative response to be avoided to improve intergroup relations. However, this approach overlooks the transformative potential of positive stress (challenge) for progressive social changes. To address this gap, we investigated whether, and if so, under what conditions, social change is perceived as threatening or challenging. Results from a representative Dutch sample (N = 411) revealed that social change is more threatening than the status quo. Furthermore, the instrumental (vs. symbolic) aspects of change, and its perceived demands and uncertainty heighten threat, while the ingroup and system (vs. personal) dimensions of change, and social resources and support buffer against threat. Our results offer insight into what factors promote more adaptive (challenge) rather than maladaptive (threat) responses to social changes. They encourage a critical perspective on social change, framing threat not as inherently negative but as tensions to be navigated.
ER  -