Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Microbiology Spectrum

Genomic prediction of antimicrobial resistance in priority healthcare pathogens using Staramr

3 more authors
  1. 1National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  2. 2Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Abstract

Treatment of healthcare-associated infections is becoming increasingly challenging due to rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). As clinical microbiology and public health continue to transition toward whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for outbreak detection, diagnostics, and surveillance, the ability to accurately predict antimicrobial resistance from genomic sequence data will become crucial. In this study, in silico antimicrobial resistance prediction with the Staramr tool was refined from whole-genome sequencing data for four top-priority healthcare-associated bacteria: carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli, carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Isolates (n = 4,876) were collected in Canada within two national surveillance programs: the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program and the Canadian Ward Study. Broth microdilution was used as the gold standard to evaluate the performance of Staramr. The average sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of categorical antimicrobial resistance prediction compared to broth microdilution were 90.8%, 90.1%, and 92.4% for E. coli (n = 1,095); 87.7%, 91.7%, and 90.6% for K. pneumoniae (n = 687); 95.5%, 98.9%, and 96.3% for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (n = 2,150); and 95.4%, 97.9%, and 97.2% for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (n = 944). Additionally, this internal tool refinement identified areas of improvement for antimicrobial resistance prediction. The average sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of antimicrobial resistance prediction were high (>90%) for most combinations of antimicrobials and species that were evaluated. While AMR prediction from WGS was very promising, it did not correlate well with current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints for non-susceptibility for some antimicrobial-organism combinations. As in silico prediction of antimicrobial resistance has been improved in this study through tool refinement, it shows future promise for molecular methods to complement phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This will allow for more precise tracking of the molecular epidemiology of resistance and cost savings when isolates are being sequenced for strain typing.

IMPORTANCE: In silico prediction of antimicrobial non-susceptibility in priority healthcare pathogens is becoming an important area of study due to the rising rates of resistance and the transition to whole-genome sequencing. To evaluate whether Staramr, an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prediction tool, can reliably detect non-susceptibility in four top-priority healthcare-associated bacteria, we performed a validation study on a large Canadian clinical data set, which included carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Compared to traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing, we found that Staramr was reliable for predicting non-susceptibility for most combinations of antimicrobials and organisms; however, some combinations require additional data on genetic mechanisms of resistance for accurate prediction. Additionally, this study identified areas for refinement for current drug-gene interpretation keys. Thus, this tool refinement study advances the use of genotypic methods of AMR prediction for high-priority healthcare pathogens.

Related

  1. Temporal Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance Among Clinically Important Pathogens in Iraq, 2021-2024: Implications for Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy
    O. Darweesh, H. Ahmed, H. K. Al-Jawadi +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  2. Epidemiology, microbiological characteristics, and antimicrobial resistance of device-associated healthcare-associated infections in a neonatal intensive care unit: a six-year surveillance study
    Haiqiao Zhang, Mingyan Zou, Xiaoming Guo +2
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  3. Evolving priorities in the WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List
    Zhenlin Ouyang, Wenbo He, Xiaoyu He +3
    Biosafety and healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull text1 citedInfectious diseaseEurope PMCPMC
  4. Concordance of next-generation sequencing and conventional microbiology for pathogen detection and antimicrobial resistance prediction in pneumonia
    Nurlan Sandybayev, Radmir Sarsenov, Vitaliy Strochkov +5
    Royal Society Open SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  5. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Antimicrobial Resistance Among Users of an Indian Digital Healthcare Platform: A Cross-sectional Online Survey
    Z. Agarwal, S. Mishra, J. Kaur +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{wilke2026genomic,
  title = {{Genomic prediction of antimicrobial resistance in priority healthcare pathogens using Staramr}},
  author = {MacKenzie A. P. Wilke and Laura F. Mataseje and Nicole Lerminiaux and Melissa McCracken and Romaine Edirmanasinghe and Melanie Baxter and Ken Fakharuddin and Gurman Grewal and Xiao Rui Li and Eric Marnier and Aaron Petkau and Michael Mulvey and George Zhanel and George R. Golding and Amrita Bharat},
  journal = {Microbiology Spectrum},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1128/spectrum.01652-26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01652-26},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Genomic prediction of antimicrobial resistance in priority healthcare pathogens using Staramr
AU  - MacKenzie A. P. Wilke
AU  - Laura F. Mataseje
AU  - Nicole Lerminiaux
AU  - Melissa McCracken
AU  - Romaine Edirmanasinghe
AU  - Melanie Baxter
AU  - Ken Fakharuddin
AU  - Gurman Grewal
AU  - Xiao Rui Li
AU  - Eric Marnier
AU  - Aaron Petkau
AU  - Michael Mulvey
AU  - George Zhanel
AU  - George R. Golding
AU  - Amrita Bharat
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/06
JO  - Microbiology Spectrum
DO  - 10.1128/spectrum.01652-26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01652-26
AB  - Treatment of healthcare-associated infections is becoming increasingly challenging due to rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). As clinical microbiology and public health continue to transition toward whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for outbreak detection, diagnostics, and surveillance, the ability to accurately predict antimicrobial resistance from genomic sequence data will become crucial. In this study, in silico antimicrobial resistance prediction with the Staramr tool was refined from whole-genome sequencing data for four top-priority healthcare-associated bacteria: carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli, carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Isolates (n = 4,876) were collected in Canada within two national surveillance programs: the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program and the Canadian Ward Study. Broth microdilution was used as the gold standard to evaluate the performance of Staramr. The average sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of categorical antimicrobial resistance prediction compared to broth microdilution were 90.8%, 90.1%, and 92.4% for E. coli (n = 1,095); 87.7%, 91.7%, and 90.6% for K. pneumoniae (n = 687); 95.5%, 98.9%, and 96.3% for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (n = 2,150); and 95.4%, 97.9%, and 97.2% for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (n = 944). Additionally, this internal tool refinement identified areas of improvement for antimicrobial resistance prediction. The average sensitivity, specificity, and concordance of antimicrobial resistance prediction were high (>90%) for most combinations of antimicrobials and species that were evaluated. While AMR prediction from WGS was very promising, it did not correlate well with current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints for non-susceptibility for some antimicrobial-organism combinations. As in silico prediction of antimicrobial resistance has been improved in this study through tool refinement, it shows future promise for molecular methods to complement phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing. This will allow for more precise tracking of the molecular epidemiology of resistance and cost savings when isolates are being sequenced for strain typing.  IMPORTANCE: In silico prediction of antimicrobial non-susceptibility in priority healthcare pathogens is becoming an important area of study due to the rising rates of resistance and the transition to whole-genome sequencing. To evaluate whether Staramr, an antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prediction tool, can reliably detect non-susceptibility in four top-priority healthcare-associated bacteria, we performed a validation study on a large Canadian clinical data set, which included carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Compared to traditional antimicrobial susceptibility testing, we found that Staramr was reliable for predicting non-susceptibility for most combinations of antimicrobials and organisms; however, some combinations require additional data on genetic mechanisms of resistance for accurate prediction. Additionally, this study identified areas for refinement for current drug-gene interpretation keys. Thus, this tool refinement study advances the use of genotypic methods of AMR prediction for high-priority healthcare pathogens.
SN  - 2165-0497
ER  -