Technical overview and clinical outcomes of transabdominal strategies to eliminate or neutralize staple-line intersection during low anterior resection: a systematic review.
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Di Parma, Vaio Hospital, Fidenza, Italy.
- 2Department of General Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Locale ASL Lecce, Casarano, Italy.
- 3Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
- 4IRCCS de Bellis, Castellana Grotte, 70013, Bari, Italy.
- 5Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. [email protected].
Abstract
Aim
To systematically classify and describe transabdominal surgical techniques designed to eliminate or neutralize staple-line intersection during low anterior resection (LAR), and to summarize their reported clinical outcomes.Methods
A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261368367). Major databases were searched for studies describing transabdominal techniques aimed at eliminating or neutralizing staple-line intersection in colorectal anastomosis during LAR. Both modified double-stapling techniques (mDST) and abdominal single-stapled techniques (aSST) were included. Outcomes of interest included anastomotic leak (AL), use of protective stoma, and perioperative variables. Reported outcomes were descriptively summarized, and exploratory aggregated analyses were performed when appropriate.Results
Seventeen studies (998 patients) were included. Ten studies (529 patients) evaluated mDST (suture-based: n = 192; invagination-based: n = 337), while seven studies (469 patients) assessed aSST. Reported AL rates remained low across both mDST subgroups (3.1% suture-based vs 3.9% invagination-based), with an aggregated rate of 3.6%. The aSST group showed a leak rate of 6.0%. Protective stomas were used in 6.2% of mDST and 33.1% of aSST. Neoadjuvant therapy was used in 20.7% of aSST and 11.9% of mDST. Considerable heterogeneity in study design, technique, and outcome reporting was observed.Conclusions
Transabdominal techniques that eliminate or neutralize staple-line intersection appear feasible and associated with low anastomotic leak rates. Modified DST techniques appear technically feasible and have been associated with low reported leak rates. However, owing to the heterogeneity of the available evidence, comparative findings should be considered exploratory.
Related
- Efficacy of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- A systematic review of intergenerational interventions at the intersection of climate change and mental health
- Fundamental Strategies and Technical Perspectives in Bile Duct Anastomosis for Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Growth From Novice to Maturity
- Transcatheter Electrosurgical Aortic Septotomy Across the Spectrum of Type B Aortic Dissection: Feasibility, Technical Lessons, and Bailout Strategies
- Delayed Retention of Technical Surgical Skills Following Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed-Reality Simulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{annicchiarico2026technical,
title = {{Technical overview and clinical outcomes of transabdominal strategies to eliminate or neutralize staple-line intersection during low anterior resection: a systematic review.}},
author = {Alfredo Annicchiarico and Gianpiero Gravante and Rossella Melcarne and Leonardo Vincenti and Arcangelo Picciariello},
journal = {International journal of colorectal disease},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1007/s00384-026-05205-8},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42905205},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Technical overview and clinical outcomes of transabdominal strategies to eliminate or neutralize staple-line intersection during low anterior resection: a systematic review.
AU - Alfredo Annicchiarico
AU - Gianpiero Gravante
AU - Rossella Melcarne
AU - Leonardo Vincenti
AU - Arcangelo Picciariello
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/25
JO - International journal of colorectal disease
DO - 10.1007/s00384-026-05205-8
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42905205
AB - Aim To systematically classify and describe transabdominal surgical techniques designed to eliminate or neutralize staple-line intersection during low anterior resection (LAR), and to summarize their reported clinical outcomes.Methods A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261368367). Major databases were searched for studies describing transabdominal techniques aimed at eliminating or neutralizing staple-line intersection in colorectal anastomosis during LAR. Both modified double-stapling techniques (mDST) and abdominal single-stapled techniques (aSST) were included. Outcomes of interest included anastomotic leak (AL), use of protective stoma, and perioperative variables. Reported outcomes were descriptively summarized, and exploratory aggregated analyses were performed when appropriate.Results Seventeen studies (998 patients) were included. Ten studies (529 patients) evaluated mDST (suture-based: n = 192; invagination-based: n = 337), while seven studies (469 patients) assessed aSST. Reported AL rates remained low across both mDST subgroups (3.1% suture-based vs 3.9% invagination-based), with an aggregated rate of 3.6%. The aSST group showed a leak rate of 6.0%. Protective stomas were used in 6.2% of mDST and 33.1% of aSST. Neoadjuvant therapy was used in 20.7% of aSST and 11.9% of mDST. Considerable heterogeneity in study design, technique, and outcome reporting was observed.Conclusions Transabdominal techniques that eliminate or neutralize staple-line intersection appear feasible and associated with low anastomotic leak rates. Modified DST techniques appear technically feasible and have been associated with low reported leak rates. However, owing to the heterogeneity of the available evidence, comparative findings should be considered exploratory.
SN - 0179-1958
SN - 1432-1262
ER -