Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 39 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFluids and barriers of the CNS

Motor network neurophysiological (TMS-EEG) markers as predictors of outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt sustained for over a year in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

8 affiliations
  1. 1Movement Disorders Institute and Department of Neurology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 31 Emek Ha'ela, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, 526201, Israel.
  2. 2Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
  3. 3Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  4. 4QuantalX Neuroscience Ltd., Kfar-Saba, Israel.
  5. 5Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
  6. 6Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  7. 7Movement Disorders Institute and Department of Neurology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 31 Emek Ha'ela, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, 526201, Israel. [email protected].
  8. 8Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. [email protected].

Abstract

Background and objectives

Current practice for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) relies on clinical presentation, imaging, and various clinical procedures to determine the need for neurosurgical intervention, specifically the installation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a TMS-evoked potential (TEP)-based assessment (Delphi-MD) for predicting sustained response (over one year) to VPS, serving as an ancillary test to the cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CTT).Methods

Forty-one patients with possible iNPH underwent Delphi-MD evaluation of wave form adherence (WFA), a composite measure assessing how closely their TEPs resembled an ideal benchmark TEP. Of these, 18 patients received VPS treatment following a multidisciplinary team decision based on standard practice, blinded to the TEP results. Response to the intervention was evaluated over a period of more than one year using the clinical global impression of change (CGIC) scale, in addition to assessments with a 10-meter timed up and go test and the modified Rankin scale.Results

Responders had higher M1L WFA values at baseline (prior to VPS) than non-responders (median 0.51 [95% CI 0.36-0.76], median 0.14 [95% CI -0.02-0.38], respectively p = 0.012). M1L WFA was successful in distinguishing responders (11/18) from non-responders (7/18) with an ROC-AUC of 0.935 [bootstrap 95% CI 0.792-1.00], p < 0.0001. M1L WFA cutoff was established with LOOCV and produced 90.9% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity and 88.9% accuracy. In contrast the CTT result was unsuccessful in predicting shunt responsiveness.Conclusion

This study indicates that higher M1L WFA obtained through Delphi-MD (TMS-EEG), signifies better preservation and functional integrity of the motor network in patients with probable iNPH that had a sustained response to VPS than those that did not. Given replication of results in future independent cohorts, Delphi-MD shows promise as an objective, accurate, and accessible ancillary screening tool for iNPH candidates, prior to referral for VPS treatment.Trial registration

Registration number: MOH_2021-12-08_010449. Registration date: 11.09.2021. https://clinicaltrial.health.gov.il/clinicaltrials/?sort=experimentapproveddate_tdt+desc&page=1&searchQuery=MOH_2021-12-08_010449 .

Related

  1. Sustained attention under load: Neurophysiological mechanisms and behavioural consequences
    L. C. Barne, X. Fu, N. Lavie
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Stereotactic guidance for ventricular catheter placement in ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: a state-of-the-art review on technical rationale, clinical outcomes, and future directions.
    Erich Talamoni Fonoff, Igor Baroni Cardoso, Alexandre Maria Santos
    Frontiers in neurologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt outcomes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and an Evans index below 0.3: a prospective study
    Thanapat Akaraboonlertyot, Ekawut Chankaew, Bunpot Sitthinamsuwan +3
    Acta NeurochirurgicaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurosciencePMC
  4. Feasibility of a Patient-Specific Digital Twin for Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Trajectory Planning
    Kritsanavis Chongsrid, Vich Yindeedej, Supaporn Konmun +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textBioinformatics & computational biologyarXiv
  5. OphthoEvidence report: Baseline structural optical coherence tomography biomarkers as predictors of visual outcomes following full-thickness macular hole surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Sahar Khademioore, João Pedro Lima, Dena Zeraatkar +8
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceMedical imaging & radiologyPLOS
BibTeX
@article{davidy2026motor,
  title = {{Motor network neurophysiological (TMS-EEG) markers as predictors of outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt sustained for over a year in normal pressure hydrocephalus.}},
  author = {Tal Davidy and Alexandra Suminski and Yakov Zauberman and Tsvia Fay-Karmon and Saar Anis and Adi Saar and Noa Zifman and Hilla Fogel and Ofri Levy-Lamdan and Orit Lesman-Segev and Sharon Hassin-Baer},
  journal = {Fluids and barriers of the CNS},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1186/s12987-026-00844-z},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902404},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Motor network neurophysiological (TMS-EEG) markers as predictors of outcomes of ventriculoperitoneal shunt sustained for over a year in normal pressure hydrocephalus.
AU  - Tal Davidy
AU  - Alexandra Suminski
AU  - Yakov Zauberman
AU  - Tsvia Fay-Karmon
AU  - Saar Anis
AU  - Adi Saar
AU  - Noa Zifman
AU  - Hilla Fogel
AU  - Ofri Levy-Lamdan
AU  - Orit Lesman-Segev
AU  - Sharon Hassin-Baer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/01
JO  - Fluids and barriers of the CNS
DO  - 10.1186/s12987-026-00844-z
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42902404
AB  - Background and objectives  Current practice for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) relies on clinical presentation, imaging, and various clinical procedures to determine the need for neurosurgical intervention, specifically the installation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a TMS-evoked potential (TEP)-based assessment (Delphi-MD) for predicting sustained response (over one year) to VPS, serving as an ancillary test to the cerebrospinal fluid tap test (CTT).Methods  Forty-one patients with possible iNPH underwent Delphi-MD evaluation of wave form adherence (WFA), a composite measure assessing how closely their TEPs resembled an ideal benchmark TEP. Of these, 18 patients received VPS treatment following a multidisciplinary team decision based on standard practice, blinded to the TEP results. Response to the intervention was evaluated over a period of more than one year using the clinical global impression of change (CGIC) scale, in addition to assessments with a 10-meter timed up and go test and the modified Rankin scale.Results  Responders had higher M1L WFA values at baseline (prior to VPS) than non-responders (median 0.51 [95% CI 0.36-0.76], median 0.14 [95% CI -0.02-0.38], respectively p = 0.012). M1L WFA was successful in distinguishing responders (11/18) from non-responders (7/18) with an ROC-AUC of 0.935 [bootstrap 95% CI 0.792-1.00], p < 0.0001. M1L WFA cutoff was established with LOOCV and produced 90.9% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity and 88.9% accuracy. In contrast the CTT result was unsuccessful in predicting shunt responsiveness.Conclusion  This study indicates that higher M1L WFA obtained through Delphi-MD (TMS-EEG), signifies better preservation and functional integrity of the motor network in patients with probable iNPH that had a sustained response to VPS than those that did not. Given replication of results in future independent cohorts, Delphi-MD shows promise as an objective, accurate, and accessible ancillary screening tool for iNPH candidates, prior to referral for VPS treatment.Trial registration  Registration number: MOH_2021-12-08_010449. Registration date: 11.09.2021. https://clinicaltrial.health.gov.il/clinicaltrials/?sort=experimentapproveddate_tdt+desc&page=1&searchQuery=MOH_2021-12-08_010449 .
SN  - 2045-8118
ER  -