Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis due to Rubber Additives in Tunisia: A 27‐Year Retrospective Study of Clinical and Occupational Characteristics
- 1Department of Occupational Medicine Rabta University Hospital Tunis Tunisia
- 2Faculty of Medicine of Tunis University Tunis El Manar Tunis Tunisia
Abstract
Background: Rubber additives are established causes of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD), but data from North Africa are scarce.
Objectives: To characterize OACD due to rubber additives in a Tunisian tertiary referral population and assess its impact on fitness for work.
Methods: A retrospective study included all adult patients diagnosed with OACD to rubber additives between 1998 and 2025. Patch testing was performed with the European baseline series, with additional rubber series in selected cases. Clinical, occupational and allergological data were analysed. Associations with MOAHLFA index and temporal trends were assessed using logistic regression.
Results: Eighty patients were included. Thiurams were the most frequent sensitizers (74%), followed by benzothiazole derivatives (24%) and p‐phenylenediamine derivatives (14%). The healthcare sector predominated (51%) and gloves were the main exposure source (88%). Sensitization to multiple rubber additive families occurred in 19% of cases. No significant associations were found with MOAHLFA index after adjustment and no significant temporal trends were observed. Workplace adaptation was required in all cases and OACD met criteria for compensation as an occupational disease in 92%.
Conclusions: OACD due to rubber additives remains frequent and is associated with a substantial occupational impact, emphasizing the need for preventive measures.
Related
- Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Over‐Ear Headphones: Chemical Analysis Reveals Octylisothiazolinone and Other Potential Skin Sensitizers
- Clinical Characteristics of Patients Presenting with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Concomitant Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: a Multicenter Retrospective Study.
- Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Children Over a 20‐Year Period: A Danish Single‐Centre Study
- Recreational Allergic Contact Dermatitis to “Epoxy UV ” Resins: A New Source of Exposure to Hidden (Meth)acrylates
- Substance P–NK1R signaling of keratinocytes initiates the skin inflammatory environment required for allergic contact dermatitis
BibTeX
@article{baraketi2026occupational,
title = {{Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis due to Rubber Additives in Tunisia: A 27‐Year Retrospective Study of Clinical and Occupational Characteristics}},
author = {Emna Baraketi and Jihen Hsinet and Nihel Khouja and Aida Benzarti},
journal = {Contact Dermatitis},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1111/cod.70253},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.70253},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Occupational Allergic Contact Dermatitis due to Rubber Additives in Tunisia: A 27‐Year Retrospective Study of Clinical and Occupational Characteristics
AU - Emna Baraketi
AU - Jihen Hsinet
AU - Nihel Khouja
AU - Aida Benzarti
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/27
JO - Contact Dermatitis
DO - 10.1111/cod.70253
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.70253
AB - Background: Rubber additives are established causes of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD), but data from North Africa are scarce. Objectives: To characterize OACD due to rubber additives in a Tunisian tertiary referral population and assess its impact on fitness for work. Methods: A retrospective study included all adult patients diagnosed with OACD to rubber additives between 1998 and 2025. Patch testing was performed with the European baseline series, with additional rubber series in selected cases. Clinical, occupational and allergological data were analysed. Associations with MOAHLFA index and temporal trends were assessed using logistic regression. Results: Eighty patients were included. Thiurams were the most frequent sensitizers (74%), followed by benzothiazole derivatives (24%) and p‐phenylenediamine derivatives (14%). The healthcare sector predominated (51%) and gloves were the main exposure source (88%). Sensitization to multiple rubber additive families occurred in 19% of cases. No significant associations were found with MOAHLFA index after adjustment and no significant temporal trends were observed. Workplace adaptation was required in all cases and OACD met criteria for compensation as an occupational disease in 92%. Conclusions: OACD due to rubber additives remains frequent and is associated with a substantial occupational impact, emphasizing the need for preventive measures.
SN - 0105-1873
SN - 1600-0536
ER -