Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 30 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of clinical medicine

Interocular Differences in Visual Acuity and Refractive Status Between Unilateral Early and Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

  • Chang Gu Kang1
  • Su Kang Kim1,2
  • Hyungoo Kang1,3
  • Sang-il Park1,2,3
  1. 1Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung 25601, Republic of Korea
  2. 2Institute of Natural Product Biotechnology, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung 25601, Republic of Korea
  3. 3Department of Optometry, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung 25601, Republic of Korea
Read full textPDFDOICite

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) may affect the two eyes asymmetrically, but visual impairment is commonly classified by visual acuity (VA) in the better-seeing eye. We compared interocular-presenting VA differences in unilateral early versus late AMD, assessed the association between late AMD and worse VA in the AMD-affected eye, and compared refractive status between the affected and fellow eyes. Methods: We analyzed 1112 adults aged ≥40 years with unilateral AMD (1049 early and 63 late) from the 2017–2020 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Interocular VA difference was calculated as the logMAR VA of the AMD-affected eye minus that of the fellow eye. Survey-weighted modified Poisson regression estimated prevalence ratios (PRs), adjusting for age, sex, anisometropia, and the interocular difference in absolute spherical equivalent refraction. Exploratory analyses examined neovascular AMD and geographic atrophy separately, and sensitivity analyses assessed alternative model specifications. Results: Mean interocular differences were −0.004 logMAR (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.016 to 0.008) in early AMD and 0.184 logMAR (95% CI, 0.077 to 0.291) in late AMD. The weighted proportions with VA ≥ 0.2 logMAR worse in the AMD-affected eye were 10.15% and 58.31%, respectively. The adjusted PR for this outcome was 4.95 (95% CI, 3.46–7.09; p < 0.001) for late versus early AMD. Exploratory subtype-specific analyses showed similar associations for neovascular AMD and geographic atrophy. No statistically significant interocular differences in refractive status or astigmatism severity were detected; however, the wide 95% CIs, particularly in the late AMD group, precluded conclusions of equivalence. Conclusions: Unilateral late AMD was associated with greater interocular presenting VA asymmetry than early AMD, and the association remained consistent across sensitivity analyses. However, these cross-sectional findings do not establish longitudinal progression or directly demonstrate implications for spectacle prescribing or binocular visual function.

Related

  1. Systemic lupus erythematosus is associated with age-related macular degeneration risk in a nationwide Korean cohort
    Hong Ki Min, Bora Lee, Hyeongsu Kim +2
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  2. Urban–rural differences in refractive status and visual behaviors among preschool children aged 3–6 years in Shunyi district, Beijing: a multidimensional analysis
    Yong Tang, Aimin Jiang
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  3. Cannabis legalisation and cardiovascular hospitalisations in the United States: nationwide difference-in-differences analysis, 2012–2018
    Samuel D Slavin, Amy R Mahar, Eric A Secemsky +2
    BMJ OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textPharmacology & toxicologyCrossref
  4. Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation ― Insights From a Nationwide Japanese Registry ―
    Kentaro Mitsui, Kensuke Takagi, Yu Kataoka +19
    Circulation JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textCardiovascular medicineJ-STAGE
  5. Trends and differences in breast cancer mortality by race, region and age among Brazilian women, 1996-2024: a nationwide ecological study
    A. T. Zuffo Yabrude, L. C. Souza Reis, A. E. Saragossa Zafalon +2
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv

Cite

BibTeXRIS
BibTeX
@article{kang2026interocular,
  title = {{Interocular Differences in Visual Acuity and Refractive Status Between Unilateral Early and Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Nationwide Population-Based Study}},
  author = {Chang Gu Kang and Su Kang Kim and Hyungoo Kang and Sang-il Park},
  journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15197672},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13665769},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Interocular Differences in Visual Acuity and Refractive Status Between Unilateral Early and Late Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
AU  - Chang Gu Kang
AU  - Su Kang Kim
AU  - Hyungoo Kang
AU  - Sang-il Park
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Journal of clinical medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15197672
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13665769
AB  - Background/Objectives: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) may affect the two eyes asymmetrically, but visual impairment is commonly classified by visual acuity (VA) in the better-seeing eye. We compared interocular-presenting VA differences in unilateral early versus late AMD, assessed the association between late AMD and worse VA in the AMD-affected eye, and compared refractive status between the affected and fellow eyes. Methods: We analyzed 1112 adults aged ≥40 years with unilateral AMD (1049 early and 63 late) from the 2017–2020 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Interocular VA difference was calculated as the logMAR VA of the AMD-affected eye minus that of the fellow eye. Survey-weighted modified Poisson regression estimated prevalence ratios (PRs), adjusting for age, sex, anisometropia, and the interocular difference in absolute spherical equivalent refraction. Exploratory analyses examined neovascular AMD and geographic atrophy separately, and sensitivity analyses assessed alternative model specifications. Results: Mean interocular differences were −0.004 logMAR (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.016 to 0.008) in early AMD and 0.184 logMAR (95% CI, 0.077 to 0.291) in late AMD. The weighted proportions with VA ≥ 0.2 logMAR worse in the AMD-affected eye were 10.15% and 58.31%, respectively. The adjusted PR for this outcome was 4.95 (95% CI, 3.46–7.09; p < 0.001) for late versus early AMD. Exploratory subtype-specific analyses showed similar associations for neovascular AMD and geographic atrophy. No statistically significant interocular differences in refractive status or astigmatism severity were detected; however, the wide 95% CIs, particularly in the late AMD group, precluded conclusions of equivalence. Conclusions: Unilateral late AMD was associated with greater interocular presenting VA asymmetry than early AMD, and the association remained consistent across sensitivity analyses. However, these cross-sectional findings do not establish longitudinal progression or directly demonstrate implications for spectacle prescribing or binocular visual function.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -