Rural-urban disparities in the clinical diagnostic pathway of patients with all-cause mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in Australia
9 affiliations
- 1School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- 2Health Technology Analysts, Surry Hills, New South Wales, Australia
- 3Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- 4Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Barangaroo, New South Wales, Australia
- 5Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- 6Department of Geriatric Medicine, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- 7Sustainability Insights, Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
- 8LCP Health, Lane Clark & Peacock LLP, London, UK
- 9Medical Health and Cognitive Research Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Victoria, Australia
Abstract
Background: Access to high-quality and timely dementia diagnoses varies between rural and urban location.
Objective: We examined rural-urban disparities in key indicators for high-quality and timely diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in Australia.
Methods: 3648 patients with all-cause MCI or AD dementia were geographically classified into major cities (75.7%), inner (15.8%) and outer (8.4%) regional areas. We used regression analyses to assess rural-urban disparities in completion of key diagnostic investigations and diagnostic wait times.
Results: Participants in inner regional areas were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14, 2.13; p = 0.006) to have had more basic diagnostic investigations completed (including core blood tests, cognitive assessments, functional assessments, structural neuroimaging) compared to those in major cities. However, participants in inner regional (OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.28, 0.48; p < 0.001) and outer regional (OR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.21, 0.48; p < 0.001) areas were less likely to have functional neuroimaging completed. Median wait times for an initial appointment following referral to a memory clinic were up to 28 days longer for rural compared to urban participants (Inner regional: Beta (median) = 12.91; 95% CI = 5.15, 20.69; p = 0.001; Outer regional: Beta (median) = 27.50; 95% CI = 18.80, 36.20; p < 0.001), whereas median wait times from initial appointment to diagnosis were up to 47 days shorter in rural compared to urban residents (Inner regional: Beta (median) = −46.83; 95% CI = −52.35, −41.32; p < 0.001; Outer regional: Beta (median) = −44.42; 95% CI = −50.35, −38.49; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Findings suggest disparities in access to advanced diagnostic investigations and timely initial appointments in rural Australia, and increased need for enhanced workforce and diagnostic infrastructure in these areas.
Related
- Recognising Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Alzheimer's Disease in General and Psychiatric Practice: Clinical Clues and Appropriate Referral
- Sex‐specific brain reserve and progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia
- Higher plasma oleic acid is associated with slower progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease in men and women
- Gastrodin alleviates mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease via candidate targeting of ACHE, S1PR5, SERPINE1, and TOP2A: an integrative computational and cellular study
- Development of the Japanese Version of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study—Activities of Daily Living in Mild Cognitive Impairment Scale
BibTeX
@article{lin2026ruralurban,
title = {{Rural-urban disparities in the clinical diagnostic pathway of patients with all-cause mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in Australia}},
author = {Xiaoping Lin and Mohammad Amin Honardoost and Susannah Ahern and Colman Taylor and Stephanie Ward and Elisabeth de Laguiche and Elizabeth Adesanya and Henry Brodaty and Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard and Sara Holloway and Michael Woodward},
journal = {Journal of Alzheimer's Disease},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1177/13872877261489828},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261489828},
note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Rural-urban disparities in the clinical diagnostic pathway of patients with all-cause mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease in Australia
AU - Xiaoping Lin
AU - Mohammad Amin Honardoost
AU - Susannah Ahern
AU - Colman Taylor
AU - Stephanie Ward
AU - Elisabeth de Laguiche
AU - Elizabeth Adesanya
AU - Henry Brodaty
AU - Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard
AU - Sara Holloway
AU - Michael Woodward
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/29
JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
DO - 10.1177/13872877261489828
UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261489828
AB - Background: Access to high-quality and timely dementia diagnoses varies between rural and urban location. Objective: We examined rural-urban disparities in key indicators for high-quality and timely diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in Australia. Methods: 3648 patients with all-cause MCI or AD dementia were geographically classified into major cities (75.7%), inner (15.8%) and outer (8.4%) regional areas. We used regression analyses to assess rural-urban disparities in completion of key diagnostic investigations and diagnostic wait times. Results: Participants in inner regional areas were more likely (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14, 2.13; p = 0.006) to have had more basic diagnostic investigations completed (including core blood tests, cognitive assessments, functional assessments, structural neuroimaging) compared to those in major cities. However, participants in inner regional (OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.28, 0.48; p < 0.001) and outer regional (OR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.21, 0.48; p < 0.001) areas were less likely to have functional neuroimaging completed. Median wait times for an initial appointment following referral to a memory clinic were up to 28 days longer for rural compared to urban participants (Inner regional: Beta (median) = 12.91; 95% CI = 5.15, 20.69; p = 0.001; Outer regional: Beta (median) = 27.50; 95% CI = 18.80, 36.20; p < 0.001), whereas median wait times from initial appointment to diagnosis were up to 47 days shorter in rural compared to urban residents (Inner regional: Beta (median) = −46.83; 95% CI = −52.35, −41.32; p < 0.001; Outer regional: Beta (median) = −44.42; 95% CI = −50.35, −38.49; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Findings suggest disparities in access to advanced diagnostic investigations and timely initial appointments in rural Australia, and increased need for enhanced workforce and diagnostic infrastructure in these areas.
SN - 1387-2877
SN - 1875-8908
ER -