Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDBMC medical education

Evaluating the effectiveness of a MOOC-based flipped classroom approach in occupational health and occupational medicine education.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Queen Mary School, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 1299 Xue Fu Avenue, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330031, P. R. of China.
  2. 2School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 461 Ba Yi Avenue, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, P. R. of China.
  3. 3Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Disease Prevention and Public Health, Nanchang University, No. 461 Ba Yi Avenue, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, P. R. of China.
  4. 4School of Public Health, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 461 Ba Yi Avenue, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, P. R. of China. [email protected].
  5. 5Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Disease Prevention and Public Health, Nanchang University, No. 461 Ba Yi Avenue, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, P. R. of China. [email protected].

Abstract

Background and aim

The "New Medical Science" initiative in China calls for the integration of digital technologies into medical education. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a blended learning approach, incorporating the Chinese University Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) platform and a flipped classroom model, compared to traditional lecture-based teaching in a compulsory "Occupational Health and Occupational Medicine" course.Methods

A comparative study was conducted among preventive medicine undergraduates at Nanchang University, in China. The 2016 cohort (n = 84) participated in the MOOC-based flipped classroom (intervention group), while the 2017 cohort (n = 97) received traditional lecture-based teaching (control group). The primary outcome was the final examination score. A comprehensive analysis, including test paper quality (difficulty, discrimination, reliability, validity), normality of score distributions, and between-group comparisons (t-test, multiple linear regression and chi-square test), were performed to ensure a rigorous comparison.Results

The final examination papers for both groups were of comparable quality, with appropriate difficulty and good discriminative power. Score distributions for both groups were normal. Students in the MOOC-based flipped classroom group achieved a significantly higher mean exam score (68.95 ± 8.75) than those in the traditional lecture-based teaching group (64.29 ± 12.48), a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.005). The finding remained robust after adjusting for baseline covariates (adjusted mean difference = 3.48 points, 95% confidence interval: 0.44 to 6.53, P = 0.025). Furthermore, the pass rate (≥ 60) was significantly higher in the intervention group (85.71% vs. 72.16%, P = 0.026).Conclusion

The MOOC-based flipped classroom approach was associated with better academic performance and higher pass rates compared to traditional teaching in the course of "Occupational Health and Occupational Medicine". This model represents a promising strategy associated with enhanced medical education quality and supporting the goals of the "New Medical Science" reform.

Related

  1. From Concept to Classroom: Developing and Evaluating Pain Smart, a School-Based Pain Education Module.
    Isabelle Bogard, Steven J Kamper, Andrew Sortwell +4
    Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleurPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textObstetrics, gynaecology & paediatricsEurope PMCPMCDOAJ
  2. Evaluating the effectiveness of the SPICES model in enhancing students' learning experience in social medicine and public health field training at jiroft university of medical sciences, Iran.
    Reza Faryabi, Ehsan Movahed, Alireza Yusefi
    BMC medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCPMC
  3. Evaluating the effectiveness of a hybrid diabetes education program: a secondary analysis of healthy community clinic records in Jordan.
    Duaa Al-Maghaireh, Saif Fakhoury, Mariam Kawafha +7
    BMC medical educationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMCDOAJPMC
  4. Evaluating the Impact of a Sustainability Education Intervention on Emergency Medicine Residents.
    Atieh D Ashkezari, Christina Bogdani, Xueqing Huang +1
    The western journal of emergency medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  5. Flipped classroom and technology-enhanced learning in dermatology education: evidence, implementation, and future directions
    Meng Zhang, Ruiqi Chu, Shengni Zhang +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ding2026evaluating,
  title = {{Evaluating the effectiveness of a MOOC-based flipped classroom approach in occupational health and occupational medicine education.}},
  author = {Haofeng Ding and Huanhong Ji and Dalei Zhang and Huai Wang},
  journal = {BMC medical education},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s12909-026-10110-3},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972318},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating the effectiveness of a MOOC-based flipped classroom approach in occupational health and occupational medicine education.
AU  - Haofeng Ding
AU  - Huanhong Ji
AU  - Dalei Zhang
AU  - Huai Wang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/01
JO  - BMC medical education
DO  - 10.1186/s12909-026-10110-3
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972318
AB  - Background and aim  The "New Medical Science" initiative in China calls for the integration of digital technologies into medical education. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a blended learning approach, incorporating the Chinese University Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) platform and a flipped classroom model, compared to traditional lecture-based teaching in a compulsory "Occupational Health and Occupational Medicine" course.Methods  A comparative study was conducted among preventive medicine undergraduates at Nanchang University, in China. The 2016 cohort (n = 84) participated in the MOOC-based flipped classroom (intervention group), while the 2017 cohort (n = 97) received traditional lecture-based teaching (control group). The primary outcome was the final examination score. A comprehensive analysis, including test paper quality (difficulty, discrimination, reliability, validity), normality of score distributions, and between-group comparisons (t-test, multiple linear regression and chi-square test), were performed to ensure a rigorous comparison.Results  The final examination papers for both groups were of comparable quality, with appropriate difficulty and good discriminative power. Score distributions for both groups were normal. Students in the MOOC-based flipped classroom group achieved a significantly higher mean exam score (68.95 ± 8.75) than those in the traditional lecture-based teaching group (64.29 ± 12.48), a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.005). The finding remained robust after adjusting for baseline covariates (adjusted mean difference = 3.48 points, 95% confidence interval: 0.44 to 6.53, P = 0.025). Furthermore, the pass rate (≥ 60) was significantly higher in the intervention group (85.71% vs. 72.16%, P = 0.026).Conclusion  The MOOC-based flipped classroom approach was associated with better academic performance and higher pass rates compared to traditional teaching in the course of "Occupational Health and Occupational Medicine". This model represents a promising strategy associated with enhanced medical education quality and supporting the goals of the "New Medical Science" reform.
SN  - 1472-6920
ER  -