Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 4 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Quantum Secret Sharing and Error Correction vs No-Cloning

Abstract

Secret sharing is ubiquitous throughout cryptography. All possible access structures are classically feasible, and in the case of threshold access structures, the protocols are even very efficient. However, when moving to the quantum setting, the no-cloning theorem shows that many access structures are impossible. In fact, no-cloning exactly characterizes feasibility: for thresholds, quantum secret sharing is possible if and only if the threshold t is strictly more than n/2. In this work, we propose a variant of quantum secret sharing (QSS) where two or more identical copies of the input state are provided, but the output is only required to recover one copy. This notion circumvents the simple one-copy no-cloning obstruction, though the natural k-copy generalization still gives much milder obstructions. For thresholds using k copies, no-cloning implies that QSS is impossible whenever t≤ n/(k+1). It is tempting to hypothesize that no-cloning continues to exactly characterize the many-copy case. However, we show that this is not the case. We give positive results showing that multiple copies allow for going slightly beyond the single-copy obstruction: for thresholds, we construct QSS whenever t>(n−k+1)/2. On the other hand, we give a novel obstruction we call the Clique Path obstruction, which applies to arbitrary access structures. For thresholds, it shows that QSS is impossible whenever t≤ (n−1)/k. Our upper and lower bounds exactly match for k=2. Both our results leverage connections to the k-colorability of certain graphs derived from the access structure. We leave closing the gap for k≥ 3 copies as a fascinating direction for future work. Secret sharing is closely related to error correction, which can also be considered in the many-copy setting. Our results imply similar obstructions for quantum error correction for erasure channels.

Related

  1. Quantum secret sharing in a tripartite superconducting network
    W. K. Yam, C. Wilkinson, S. Gandorfer +6
    PRX QuantumPeer-reviewedPublisher termsQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
  2. Combinatorial aspects of holographic quantum secret sharing
    Ning Bao, Keiichiro Furuya, Jacob March
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. Traceable Quantum Secret Sharing
    Mengyan Qiao, Jian Long, Yu Li +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Quantum Secret Sharing with a Helper and Programmable Access Structures
    Eric Chitambar, Sarah Hagen, David W. Kribs +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. Collusion-Secure Semi-Quantum Secret Sharing Scheme using a Quantum Third Party
    Santanu Majhi, Nirupam Basak
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chien2026quantum,
  title = {{Quantum Secret Sharing and Error Correction vs No-Cloning}},
  author = {Steven Chien and Ishani Mukherjee and Mark Zhandry},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.00441},
  eprint = {2610.00441},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00441},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Quantum Secret Sharing and Error Correction vs No-Cloning
AU  - Steven Chien
AU  - Ishani Mukherjee
AU  - Mark Zhandry
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.00441
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00441
AB  - Secret sharing is ubiquitous throughout cryptography. All possible access structures are classically feasible, and in the case of threshold access structures, the protocols are even very efficient. However, when moving to the quantum setting, the no-cloning theorem shows that many access structures are impossible. In fact, no-cloning exactly characterizes feasibility: for thresholds, quantum secret sharing is possible if and only if the threshold t is strictly more than n/2. In this work, we propose a variant of quantum secret sharing (QSS) where two or more identical copies of the input state are provided, but the output is only required to recover one copy. This notion circumvents the simple one-copy no-cloning obstruction, though the natural k-copy generalization still gives much milder obstructions. For thresholds using k copies, no-cloning implies that QSS is impossible whenever t≤ n/(k+1). It is tempting to hypothesize that no-cloning continues to exactly characterize the many-copy case. However, we show that this is not the case. We give positive results showing that multiple copies allow for going slightly beyond the single-copy obstruction: for thresholds, we construct QSS whenever t>(n−k+1)/2. On the other hand, we give a novel obstruction we call the Clique Path obstruction, which applies to arbitrary access structures. For thresholds, it shows that QSS is impossible whenever t≤ (n−1)/k. Our upper and lower bounds exactly match for k=2. Both our results leverage connections to the k-colorability of certain graphs derived from the access structure. We leave closing the gap for k≥ 3 copies as a fascinating direction for future work. Secret sharing is closely related to error correction, which can also be considered in the many-copy setting. Our results imply similar obstructions for quantum error correction for erasure channels.
ER  -