Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Ecology and Evolution

Estimating Three‐Dimensional Posture to Correct Drone‐Based Measurements of Free‐Swimming Marine Mammals: An Application to Dugongs in Shallow Waters

  1. 1School of the Environment The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia
  2. 2Akkeshi Marine Station, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere Hokkaido University Akkeshi Hokkaido Japan

Abstract

Drone‐based measurements of free‐ranging aquatic wildlife are inevitably affected by posture variations, yet this issue has remained largely unaddressed. A widely used approach is to visually inspect body curvature based on overhead shots and exclude animals exhibiting strong body curvature, which may result in a substantially reduced dataset and inconsistent quality control. We developed a drone‐based method of estimating body measurements of dugongs using dual drones (positioned vertically and obliquely relative to the animal) whilst considering body posture (Method dual ). We reconstructed 3D coordinates of the body's dorsal line and scaled these based on altitude obtained with Real‐Time Kinematic measurements. Estimation error was evaluated using 25 free‐swimming dugongs for which direct body measures were obtained out‐of‐water and compared with a conventional method based only on overhead shots (Method single ). General surfacing posture of animals was further examined using 188 wild dugongs. Method dual achieved significantly smaller absolute errors in body length (BL) than Method single both when the body was relatively curved (0.039 ± 0.033 m or 2.0% ± 1.6% of BL versus 0.114 ± 0.084 m or 4.8% ± 3.8%) and straight (0.033 ± 0.028 m or 1.3% ± 1.1% versus 0.05 ± 0.042 m or 1.5% ± 1.2%). Method dual provided reliable estimation even when the body curve ratio (ratio of apparent BL from the overhead shot to the posture‐corrected 3D BL) was lower than 0.919 (i.e., body curve is stronger), whereas Method single did not. The mean body curve ratio of free‐swimming animals was 0.926 ± 0.049 (0.751–0.992; n = 188) and 31.9% had a body curve ratio below 0.919. The proposed method enables data collection from surfacing events that would otherwise have been discarded as poor quality, which may be particularly useful when encounter rate is low. This method also helps establish quantitative thresholds for data inclusion.

Related

  1. Immersed Weight Measurements: A Useful Tool for Estimating Size and Predicting Wet and Dry Body Component Weights of the Sea Cucumber Cucumaria frondosa.
    Robert Trenholm, Jean-François Hamel, Deepika Dave +1
    BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyEurope PMC
  2. Estimating Gene Prevalence with Incomplete Genomes: Application to the Prochlorococcus Pangenome
    S. Blaskowski, L. G. Christie, Y. Raut +3
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  3. Estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in clustered data with an application to analyzing caries and periodontal disease data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
    Owen Visser, Steven Levy, Bruce Dye +3
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textBioinformatics & computational biologyStatisticsarXiv
  4. Swimming of bacterium Bacillus subtilis with multiple bundles of flagella
    Javad Najafi, Florian Altegoer, Gert Bange +1
    Soft MatterPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text12 citedBiophysicsGeneral biologyHAL
  5. Data-driven frame-by-frame analysis of surface swimming and terrestrial walking in the coastal beetle Phaleria atriceps
    K. Sakura, K. Yano, M. Nakata +1
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textZoology & animal behaviourbioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{yamato2026estimating,
  title = {{Estimating Three‐Dimensional Posture to Correct Drone‐Based Measurements of Free‐Swimming Marine Mammals: An Application to Dugongs in Shallow Waters}},
  author = {Chiaki Yamato and Helen L. Sneath and Janet M. Lanyon},
  journal = {Ecology and Evolution},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/ece3.74446},
  url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.74446},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Estimating Three‐Dimensional Posture to Correct Drone‐Based Measurements of Free‐Swimming Marine Mammals: An Application to Dugongs in Shallow Waters
AU  - Chiaki Yamato
AU  - Helen L. Sneath
AU  - Janet M. Lanyon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/20
JO  - Ecology and Evolution
DO  - 10.1002/ece3.74446
UR  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.74446
AB  - Drone‐based measurements of free‐ranging aquatic wildlife are inevitably affected by posture variations, yet this issue has remained largely unaddressed. A widely used approach is to visually inspect body curvature based on overhead shots and exclude animals exhibiting strong body curvature, which may result in a substantially reduced dataset and inconsistent quality control. We developed a drone‐based method of estimating body measurements of dugongs using dual drones (positioned vertically and obliquely relative to the animal) whilst considering body posture (Method dual ). We reconstructed 3D coordinates of the body's dorsal line and scaled these based on altitude obtained with Real‐Time Kinematic measurements. Estimation error was evaluated using 25 free‐swimming dugongs for which direct body measures were obtained out‐of‐water and compared with a conventional method based only on overhead shots (Method single ). General surfacing posture of animals was further examined using 188 wild dugongs. Method dual achieved significantly smaller absolute errors in body length (BL) than Method single both when the body was relatively curved (0.039 ± 0.033 m or 2.0% ± 1.6% of BL versus 0.114 ± 0.084 m or 4.8% ± 3.8%) and straight (0.033 ± 0.028 m or 1.3% ± 1.1% versus 0.05 ± 0.042 m or 1.5% ± 1.2%). Method dual provided reliable estimation even when the body curve ratio (ratio of apparent BL from the overhead shot to the posture‐corrected 3D BL) was lower than 0.919 (i.e., body curve is stronger), whereas Method single did not. The mean body curve ratio of free‐swimming animals was 0.926 ± 0.049 (0.751–0.992; n = 188) and 31.9% had a body curve ratio below 0.919. The proposed method enables data collection from surfacing events that would otherwise have been discarded as poor quality, which may be particularly useful when encounter rate is low. This method also helps establish quantitative thresholds for data inclusion.
SN  - 2045-7758
SN  - 2045-7758
ER  -