Estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in clustered data with an application to analyzing caries and periodontal disease data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Abstract
The within-cluster subgroup composition of units can inform on the marginal distribution of those units outcomes, denoted informative subgroup size (ISS). Moreover, within-cluster subgroup composition of paired outcomes can allow one outcome to inform upon the marginal distribution of the other. If this type of ISS ignored, it can bias marginal association estimates by allowing subgroup composition to influence how clusters contribute to the analysis. We develop two weighting approaches for estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in this setting. The weights are derived using within-cluster resampling arguments and extend conventional cluster weighting to paired response subgroups. We adapt an existing test of marginal dependence to assess ISS by examining this subgroup structure in both directions. In simulated data exhibiting this bidirectional ISS, pair-based weighting reduced bias when association was primarily carried through the paired observations. These weights also allow scientifically or clinically meaningful dichotomizations to enter directly into the weighting scheme, with the choice of subgroup definition further improving estimation in several simulated settings. Application to NHANES oral-health data showed strong evidence of ISS for filled-surface outcomes across subgroups defined by clinical attachment loss and pocket depth, with the corresponding periodontal--caries associations generally small and positive. These methods provide a practical approach for estimating marginal association when paired subgroup composition is informative.
Related
- Estimating Gene Prevalence with Incomplete Genomes: Application to the Prochlorococcus Pangenome
- Estimating Three‐Dimensional Posture to Correct Drone‐Based Measurements of Free‐Swimming Marine Mammals: An Application to Dugongs in Shallow Waters
- Continental scale genetic diversity supports geo-clustered ecoregions connectivity
- Cooperative Learning with Penalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models for High-Dimensional Clustered Multiview Data
- Clustered heterogeneity, spiking history and efficient silencing maximize mutual information in adaptive time encoding
BibTeX
@misc{visser2026estimating,
title = {{Estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in clustered data with an application to analyzing caries and periodontal disease data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey}},
author = {Owen Visser and Steven Levy and Bruce Dye and Shaoping Zhang and Victor Agboli and Somnath Datta},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2605.16108},
eprint = {2605.16108},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16108},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in clustered data with an application to analyzing caries and periodontal disease data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
AU - Owen Visser
AU - Steven Levy
AU - Bruce Dye
AU - Shaoping Zhang
AU - Victor Agboli
AU - Somnath Datta
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/13
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2605.16108
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16108
AB - The within-cluster subgroup composition of units can inform on the marginal distribution of those units outcomes, denoted informative subgroup size (ISS). Moreover, within-cluster subgroup composition of paired outcomes can allow one outcome to inform upon the marginal distribution of the other. If this type of ISS ignored, it can bias marginal association estimates by allowing subgroup composition to influence how clusters contribute to the analysis. We develop two weighting approaches for estimating marginal association between paired outcomes in this setting. The weights are derived using within-cluster resampling arguments and extend conventional cluster weighting to paired response subgroups. We adapt an existing test of marginal dependence to assess ISS by examining this subgroup structure in both directions. In simulated data exhibiting this bidirectional ISS, pair-based weighting reduced bias when association was primarily carried through the paired observations. These weights also allow scientifically or clinically meaningful dichotomizations to enter directly into the weighting scheme, with the choice of subgroup definition further improving estimation in several simulated settings. Application to NHANES oral-health data showed strong evidence of ISS for filled-surface outcomes across subgroups defined by clinical attachment loss and pocket depth, with the corresponding periodontal--caries associations generally small and positive. These methods provide a practical approach for estimating marginal association when paired subgroup composition is informative.
ER -