Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Distinguishing a pseudoscalar from a vector tt̅ resonance with top-quark spin correlations at the HL-LHC

Abstract

Top-quark spin correlations provide a direct probe of the quantum numbers of a resonance decaying to tt̅. We compare a CP-odd type-II two-Higgs-doublet-model pseudoscalar A with a spin-1 leptophobic topcolor Z' in the dilepton channel. The two hypotheses differ in the parton-level helicity correlation by Δchel≃0.43, nearly independently of mass, and neutrino-weighted reconstruction preserves this separation with an effective dilution factor of about 0.66. At 400 and 800 GeV, the pseudoscalar normalization is anchored to CMS HIG-22-013 coupling limits, while the Z' rate is matched to the pseudoscalar so that the comparison primarily tests spin structure. The leading-order tt̅-only projection gives expected separations of 2.27 and 2.74 standard deviations at 3000 fb−1. Equalizing the selected signal yields gives pure spin-shape separations of 1.86 and 2.70 standard deviations. Profiling a Gaussian-constrained Standard Model chel-shape nuisance gives 2.07 and 2.63 standard deviations for an optimistic sideband benchmark, or 1.67 and 2.26 for a weaker constraint. A local fixed-template extrapolation corresponds to five-standard-deviation discrimination at couplings about 22\% and 16\% above the reference values. A 1500 GeV g=1 point is shown separately. The reach is limited by the sub-percent signal fraction and control of the mass-dependent Standard Model spin shape, rather than by the intrinsic resonance-spin separation.

Related

  1. Dirac Equations With All Possible Combinations of Scalar-Scalar, Vector-Vector and Pseudoscalar-Pseudoscalar Interactions
    Avinash Khare, Fred Cooper, John F. Dawson +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsStatistical & nonlinear physicsarXiv
  2. Gauge Interactions Involving New Vector and Pseudoscalar Particles
    Ruiyu Xing, Honglei Li, Zhi-Long Han +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Radial Excitation Spectra of Light Pseudoscalar and Vector Mesons in Light-Front Holographic QCD
    Abhisth Srivastava
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Quark spin-orbit correlations in spin-1 targets
    Hyunwoo Kim, June-Young Kim
    Physics Letters BPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0High-energy & particle physicsCrossref
  5. Probing anomalous Wtb couplings through bW spin correlations in top-quark pair production at the HL-LHC
    Qi Bi, Zekun Li, Chuntao Liu +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{bellagroudi2026distinguishing,
  title = {{Distinguishing a pseudoscalar from a vector $t\bar t$ resonance with top-quark spin correlations at the HL-LHC}},
  author = {Ahmed Bellagroudi and Farida Fassi},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.11641},
  eprint = {2609.11641},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11641},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Distinguishing a pseudoscalar from a vector tt̅ resonance with top-quark spin correlations at the HL-LHC
AU  - Ahmed Bellagroudi
AU  - Farida Fassi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/10
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.11641
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11641
AB  - Top-quark spin correlations provide a direct probe of the quantum numbers of a resonance decaying to tt̅. We compare a CP-odd type-II two-Higgs-doublet-model pseudoscalar A with a spin-1 leptophobic topcolor Z' in the dilepton channel. The two hypotheses differ in the parton-level helicity correlation by Δc_hel≃0.43, nearly independently of mass, and neutrino-weighted reconstruction preserves this separation with an effective dilution factor of about 0.66. At 400 and 800 GeV, the pseudoscalar normalization is anchored to CMS HIG-22-013 coupling limits, while the Z' rate is matched to the pseudoscalar so that the comparison primarily tests spin structure. The leading-order tt̅-only projection gives expected separations of 2.27 and 2.74 standard deviations at 3000 fb^−1. Equalizing the selected signal yields gives pure spin-shape separations of 1.86 and 2.70 standard deviations. Profiling a Gaussian-constrained Standard Model c_hel-shape nuisance gives 2.07 and 2.63 standard deviations for an optimistic sideband benchmark, or 1.67 and 2.26 for a weaker constraint. A local fixed-template extrapolation corresponds to five-standard-deviation discrimination at couplings about 22\% and 16\% above the reference values. A 1500 GeV g=1 point is shown separately. The reach is limited by the sub-percent signal fraction and control of the mass-dependent Standard Model spin shape, rather than by the intrinsic resonance-spin separation.
ER  -