Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 31 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Endocrinology

Inpatient continuous glucose monitoring halves the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with hyperinsulinism

  1. 1Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester
  2. 2Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) face recurrent and unpredictable hypoglycemia. Conventional inpatient monitoring relies on intermittent fingerprick glucose testing, which is burdensome for pediatric patients and risks missing hypoglycemic episodes between tests.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides high granularity, complimentary monitoring but with unproven efficacy to detect and reduce hypoglycemia in the inpatient setting. This study evaluates whether CGM can improve inpatient safety through the early detection, and subsequent treatment, of hypoglycemic episodes.

Methods: Thirteen inpatients with HI were monitored using Dexcom G7 or G6 device. Finger-prick glucose monitoring was performed at the expert clinician’s discretion and to verify CGM-prompted hypoglycemia alerts. All CGM data were retrospectively searched for hypoglycemia episodes. Fingerprick glucose data were concurrently analysed, alongside electronic health records, to quantify early hypoglycemia detection and subsequent hypoglycemia saved. CGM accuracy was analysed using established metrics, including hypoglycemia sensitivity and error grid analysis, in Python 3.1.1.

Results: From 3504 paired CGM and fingerprick values, hypoglycemia sensitivity was 56.7%, with CGM devices tending to overread, by a mean of +0.43mmol/L. On Hypoglycemia Error Grid analysis, 6.2% of values were classed as moderate or severe risk.

Patient data, from 627 days of monitoring, showed 721 CGM-detected hypoglycemia events (<3.5 mmol/L). Of these, 448 (62.1%) were refuted as false positives and 273 (37.9%) were confirmed as true hypoglycemia, by fingerprick glucose monitoring. Patients spent a mean of 16 minutes/day (1.1% time) in hypoglycemia. CGM alerts saved an estimated mean of 21 minutes/day of hypoglycemia; a more than halving of total hypoglycemia experienced per patient.

Discussion: The use of CGM within the inpatient setting, for those with HI, allows for a significant reduction in hypoglycemia; potentially halving hypoglycemic time. Sensor accuracy remains poor in the inpatient setting, resulting in high false negatives and suboptimal hypoglycemia sensitivity.

However, the overall burden of CGM use is relatively low in the inpatient setting, when healthcare professionals can share the work with parents.

Related

  1. Continuous glucose monitoring reveals thyroid feedback-related residual glycemic variability and hypoglycemia during inpatient glucose optimization in euthyroid adults with type 2 diabetes: a CGM-based observational study.
    Miriayi Alimujiang, Lei Zhang, Wenwen Chen +6
    BMC endocrine disordersPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEndocrinology & metabolismEurope PMC
  2. Prevention of exercise-induced hypoglycemia in 12 patients with type 1 diabetes running the Paris Marathon using continuous glucose monitoring: A prospective, single-center observational study
    Philippe Thuillier, Nikhil Domun, Emmanuel Sonnet +5
    Diabetes & MetabolismPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text5 citedEndocrinology & metabolismHAL
  3. Pediatric Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Development and Implementation of a Hospital Policy for Accuracy-Validated Insulin Dosing
    Ming Yeh Lee, Hector I. Ortega, Christopher Chow-Parmer +13
    Diabetes technology & therapeuticsPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  4. An international position statement on practical approaches for inpatient continuous glucose monitoring, insulin pumps and automated insulin delivery systems in adults
    Mikkel T. Olsen, Elias K. Spanakis, Hood Thabit +23
    DiabetologiaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEndocrinology & metabolismPMC
  5. What are the experiences, perceptions and training needs of inpatient general nursing staff on Continuous Glucose Monitoring?
    B. Donat Ergin, K. Mattishent, D. Holder +6
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textEndocrinology & metabolismmedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{chandra2026inpatient,
  title = {{Inpatient continuous glucose monitoring halves the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with hyperinsulinism}},
  author = {Chloe Chandra and Shamani De Silva and Sarah Worthington and Indraneel Banerjee and Chris Worth},
  journal = {Frontiers in Endocrinology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fendo.2026.1943475},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2026.1943475/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Inpatient continuous glucose monitoring halves the risk of hypoglycemia in patients with hyperinsulinism
AU  - Chloe Chandra
AU  - Shamani De Silva
AU  - Sarah Worthington
AU  - Indraneel Banerjee
AU  - Chris Worth
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
JO  - Frontiers in Endocrinology
DO  - 10.3389/fendo.2026.1943475
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2026.1943475/full
AB  - Introduction: Patients with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) face recurrent and unpredictable hypoglycemia. Conventional inpatient monitoring relies on intermittent fingerprick glucose testing, which is burdensome for pediatric patients and risks missing hypoglycemic episodes between tests.  Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides high granularity, complimentary monitoring but with unproven efficacy to detect and reduce hypoglycemia in the inpatient setting. This study evaluates whether CGM can improve inpatient safety through the early detection, and subsequent treatment, of hypoglycemic episodes.  Methods: Thirteen inpatients with HI were monitored using Dexcom G7 or G6 device. Finger-prick glucose monitoring was performed at the expert clinician’s discretion and to verify CGM-prompted hypoglycemia alerts. All CGM data were retrospectively searched for hypoglycemia episodes. Fingerprick glucose data were concurrently analysed, alongside electronic health records, to quantify early hypoglycemia detection and subsequent hypoglycemia saved. CGM accuracy was analysed using established metrics, including hypoglycemia sensitivity and error grid analysis, in Python 3.1.1.  Results: From 3504 paired CGM and fingerprick values, hypoglycemia sensitivity was 56.7%, with CGM devices tending to overread, by a mean of +0.43mmol/L. On Hypoglycemia Error Grid analysis, 6.2% of values were classed as moderate or severe risk.  Patient data, from 627 days of monitoring, showed 721 CGM-detected hypoglycemia events (<3.5 mmol/L). Of these, 448 (62.1%) were refuted as false positives and 273 (37.9%) were confirmed as true hypoglycemia, by fingerprick glucose monitoring. Patients spent a mean of 16 minutes/day (1.1% time) in hypoglycemia. CGM alerts saved an estimated mean of 21 minutes/day of hypoglycemia; a more than halving of total hypoglycemia experienced per patient.  Discussion: The use of CGM within the inpatient setting, for those with HI, allows for a significant reduction in hypoglycemia; potentially halving hypoglycemic time. Sensor accuracy remains poor in the inpatient setting, resulting in high false negatives and suboptimal hypoglycemia sensitivity.  However, the overall burden of CGM use is relatively low in the inpatient setting, when healthcare professionals can share the work with parents.
SN  - 1664-2392
ER  -