Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
PreprintCC BYChemRxiv

Behaviour of TMT labelled peptides in solid phase extraction, liquid chromatography, electrospray ionisation, and data-dependent acquisition

4 affiliations
  1. 1Faculty of Pharmacy
  2. 2University of Helsinki
  3. 3IUT Paul Sabatier
  4. 4Université de Toulouse

Abstract

In bottom-up proteomics, quantification with isobaric labelling involves derivatising peptides with reagents that are isobaric when intact but upon fragmentation produce reporter ions of different masses. Peptides from different samples are labelled with different reagent isotopomers, and the reporter ion intensities serve as a readout for peptide abundance in different samples, enabling sample multiplexing. Increased chromatographic retention of labelled peptides has been described and considered in models predicting peptide retention. However, how isobaric labelling affects peptide behaviour in other steps of the analytical workflow remains scarcely studied. In this work, we applied isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labelling on synthetic peptides to study how TMT labelling affects the peptides’ retention and yield in solid phase extraction, retention in liquid chromatography, and signal intensity. In addition, we monitored how closely reporter ion intensity reflects precursor ion intensity across chromatographic peaks. In solid phase extraction, TMT labelling caused a slight increase in retention without being detrimental to yield. In liquid chromatography, our results confirm those of earlier publications, identifying a retention increase, the magnitude of which is correlated with peptide hydrophilicity. We detected a near-consistent decrease of signal intensity in TMT-labelled peptides that may imply decreased ionisation efficiency but is likely mitigated by increased analyte amount that comes with multiplexing. Finally, we observed that although reporter-to-precursor ion ratios are mostly stable, for some peptides they vary enough to significantly affect quantification. Our results show that while TMT labelling affects peptide behaviour in analytics, changes to the analytical workflow are mostly not required.

Related

  1. Novel method for extraction and quantitation of 6PPD-Q in solid matrices using ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
    Thomas Chontofalsky, Fatima Alsinai, Terri Torres +2
    MethodsXPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textAnalytical chemistryEurope PMC
  2. Integrated Extraction and Purification of High-Purity Cannabidiol from Industrial Hemp: Continuous Chromatography and Scale-Up Considerations
    Xin Sui, Dongqing He, Peng Li +5
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Analytical chemistryCrossref
  3. Electrospray Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Novel Unsaturated Neutral Carbohydrate Bolaforms Obtained by Catalytic Metathesis
    Gerard Descotes, Emmanuel Gentil, Jan Ramzal +1
    Journal of the Brazilian Chemical SocietyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPhysical chemistryHAL
  4. Electrospray ion beam deposition of small peptides on solid surfaces: A molecular level description of the glutathione/copper interface
    C. Méthivier, P. Cornette, D. Costa +1
    Applied Surface SciencePeer-reviewedLicence not stated10 citedGeneral chemistryHAL
  5. Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Ecdysteroid Moulting Hormones
    Jocelyne Hellou, Joseph Banoub, Emmanuel Gentil +2
    Journal of SpectroscopyPeer-reviewedCC BY4 citedPhysical chemistryHAL
BibTeX
@misc{heinamaki2026behaviour,
  title = {{Behaviour of TMT labelled peptides in solid phase extraction, liquid chromatography, electrospray ionisation, and data-dependent acquisition}},
  author = {Essi Heinämäki and Manuelle Ronchini and Juho Heininen and Jaakko Teppo},
  howpublished = {ChemRxiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.26434/chemrxiv.15011009/v1},
  url = {https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011009/v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Behaviour of TMT labelled peptides in solid phase extraction, liquid chromatography, electrospray ionisation, and data-dependent acquisition
AU  - Essi Heinämäki
AU  - Manuelle Ronchini
AU  - Juho Heininen
AU  - Jaakko Teppo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
PB  - ChemRxiv
DO  - 10.26434/chemrxiv.15011009/v1
UR  - https://chemrxiv.org/doi/full/10.26434/chemrxiv.15011009/v1
AB  - In bottom-up proteomics, quantification with isobaric labelling involves derivatising peptides with reagents that are isobaric when intact but upon fragmentation produce reporter ions of different masses. Peptides from different samples are labelled with different reagent isotopomers, and the reporter ion intensities serve as a readout for peptide abundance in different samples, enabling sample multiplexing. Increased chromatographic retention of labelled peptides has been described and considered in models predicting peptide retention. However, how isobaric labelling affects peptide behaviour in other steps of the analytical workflow remains scarcely studied. In this work, we applied isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labelling on synthetic peptides to study how TMT labelling affects the peptides’ retention and yield in solid phase extraction, retention in liquid chromatography, and signal intensity. In addition, we monitored how closely reporter ion intensity reflects precursor ion intensity across chromatographic peaks. In solid phase extraction, TMT labelling caused a slight increase in retention without being detrimental to yield. In liquid chromatography, our results confirm those of earlier publications, identifying a retention increase, the magnitude of which is correlated with peptide hydrophilicity. We detected a near-consistent decrease of signal intensity in TMT-labelled peptides that may imply decreased ionisation efficiency but is likely mitigated by increased analyte amount that comes with multiplexing. Finally, we observed that although reporter-to-precursor ion ratios are mostly stable, for some peptides they vary enough to significantly affect quantification. Our results show that while TMT labelling affects peptide behaviour in analytics, changes to the analytical workflow are mostly not required.
ER  -