Diagnostic performance of calculated serum osmolarity versus clinical impression for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients.
- 1Department of Geriatric Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany. [email protected].
- 2Department of Geriatric Medicine, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and agreement of calculated serum osmolarity for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients, using clinical impression of dehydration as the reference standard, and to examine glucose levels across concordant and discordant classification groups.Design and setting
This prospective, observational study was conducted in a geriatric acute care unit.Participants
The study included 455 older hospitalized patients with a mean age of 82.2 ± 6.8 years and 70% were female.Measurements
Clinical impression of dehydration (dehydration vs. no dehydration [normal hydration + hyperhydration]) was judged and recorded by the attending physician within 24 h of admission. Calculated serum osmolarity was derived from routine laboratory values and classified as high (≥ 295 mOsmol/l) or normal (< 295 mOsmol/l). Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy) and agreement (Cohen's κ) were calculated. Glucose was compared between concordant/discordant groups.Results
Clinically, 23% of patients were classified as dehydrated. High calculated osmolarity occurred in 38%. Using the ≥ 295 mOsmol/l cut-off, sensitivity was 48.6% and specificity 65.1%; positive and negative predictive values were 29.7% and 80.7%, respectively, and accuracy was 61.3%. Agreement beyond chance was poor (κ = 0.112). Mean glucose was higher in osmolarity-positive groups, including false positives (all p < 0.001 for planned pairwise comparisons).Conclusion
In older hospitalized patients, calculated serum osmolarity (≥ 295 mOsmol/l) showed limited agreement with clinical dehydration assessment with frequent osmolarity-positive classifications in clinically non-dehydrated patients. These findings support cautious clinical interpretation of calculated osmolarity in acute care, particularly when glucose is elevated.
Related
- Factors associated with reduced kidney function in hospitalized children with dehydration
- Discriminative Performance of Anthropometric and Body Composition Measures for Identifying CONUT-Defined Nutritional Risk in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Case-Based Diagnostic Performance, Challenges and Tool Development in Identifying Orofacial Conditions Among Pediatric Dentists: A Mixed-Methods Study.
- Identifying subgroups with decreased performance on malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Malawi
- Diagnostic performance and clinical impact of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel compared with conventional culture in hospitalized patients with pneumonia
BibTeX
@article{pourhassan2026diagnostic,
title = {{Diagnostic performance of calculated serum osmolarity versus clinical impression for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients.}},
author = {Maryam Pourhassan and Lukas Funk and Maria Schnepper and Isabel Levermann and Baigang Wang and Chantal Giehl and Ulrike Trampisch and Rainer Wirth},
journal = {BMC geriatrics},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1186/s12877-026-08503-6},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972249},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Diagnostic performance of calculated serum osmolarity versus clinical impression for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients.
AU - Maryam Pourhassan
AU - Lukas Funk
AU - Maria Schnepper
AU - Isabel Levermann
AU - Baigang Wang
AU - Chantal Giehl
AU - Ulrike Trampisch
AU - Rainer Wirth
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/16
JO - BMC geriatrics
DO - 10.1186/s12877-026-08503-6
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972249
AB - Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and agreement of calculated serum osmolarity for identifying dehydration in older hospitalized patients, using clinical impression of dehydration as the reference standard, and to examine glucose levels across concordant and discordant classification groups.Design and setting This prospective, observational study was conducted in a geriatric acute care unit.Participants The study included 455 older hospitalized patients with a mean age of 82.2 ± 6.8 years and 70% were female.Measurements Clinical impression of dehydration (dehydration vs. no dehydration [normal hydration + hyperhydration]) was judged and recorded by the attending physician within 24 h of admission. Calculated serum osmolarity was derived from routine laboratory values and classified as high (≥ 295 mOsmol/l) or normal (< 295 mOsmol/l). Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy) and agreement (Cohen's κ) were calculated. Glucose was compared between concordant/discordant groups.Results Clinically, 23% of patients were classified as dehydrated. High calculated osmolarity occurred in 38%. Using the ≥ 295 mOsmol/l cut-off, sensitivity was 48.6% and specificity 65.1%; positive and negative predictive values were 29.7% and 80.7%, respectively, and accuracy was 61.3%. Agreement beyond chance was poor (κ = 0.112). Mean glucose was higher in osmolarity-positive groups, including false positives (all p < 0.001 for planned pairwise comparisons).Conclusion In older hospitalized patients, calculated serum osmolarity (≥ 295 mOsmol/l) showed limited agreement with clinical dehydration assessment with frequent osmolarity-positive classifications in clinically non-dehydrated patients. These findings support cautious clinical interpretation of calculated osmolarity in acute care, particularly when glucose is elevated.
SN - 1471-2318
ER -