Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 34 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0PsyArXiv

Enhanced Sensitization Training in Aplysia Produces a Focused, Distinctive Set of Transcriptional Changes that Mostly Decays as Memory is Maintained

Abstract

Forgetting remains a key puzzle in the neurobiology of memory. One mysterious aspect of forgetting is its selectivity: most long-term memories are forgotten, becoming progressively less likely to be recalled, but extensive training can produce long-term memories that are readily expressed for a lifetime. What are the molecular mechanisms through which training forestalls forgetting? To explore this issue, we leveraged a well-documented training effect in long-term sensitization in Aplysia californica: a 1-day training protocol (standard) produces sensitization that is forgotten within 7 days, whereas 4-days of training (enhanced) produces sensitization that is durably expressed. Here we confirm that enhanced sensitization training produces an enduring form of sensitization, with only subtle levels of forgetting for up to 11 days after training. We then used microarray and qPCR to characterize the transcriptional changes occurring 1, 5, and 11 days after enhanced sensitization training. We find that enhanced sensitization sustains only about 6% of the transcriptional changes induced by standard training, with many memory-linked transcripts showing no (ApCREB1) or significantly weaker (ApEgr) regulation with additional training. Enhanced training also produces distinct activation of about 20 transcripts (relative to standard training), including up-regulation of putative homologs of genes related to synaptic plasticity (HINT1) and axon maintenance (zig-4). Surprisingly, most of the transcriptional changes initially accompanying enhanced training fade rapidly, with the typical training effect at day 1 declining to 45% as strong by day 5 and then 28% as strong by day 11. This decay is not complete, and we find sustained regulation of several transcripts, including some also persistently regulated by enhanced training (e.g. FMRFa and a putative GRIK1 homolog). Overall, our results suggest that additional training produces a weaker but somewhat distinctive transcriptional response, most of which fades well before memory expression.

Related

  1. Salt priming coordinates transcriptional and epigenetic states for enhanced salt tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata)
    Zhi-Wei Wang, Min Liu, Hui-Tong Sang +8
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textPlant biologyDOAJ
  2. Enhanced Synaptic-Related Transcriptional Programs in Human Forebrain Organoids for Modeling Synaptopathy-Associated Neurodevelopmental Disorders
    Xiu-Ping Zhang, Ling-Liang Zhang, Xi-Yuan Wang +2
    CellsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. The Cytosolic Zinc Finger Domain Structure of the CCHFV Glycoprotein n Is Maintained in Its Membrane-Bound Form
    Morgane Callon, Maëlys Laux, Laura Troussicot +9
    Journal of the American Chemical SocietyPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textProteomics & metabolomicsStructural biologyHAL
  4. Long-range linkage maintained male-specific loci on a young Y chromosome prior to recombination shutdown
    M. Wang, M. Akhavizadegan, J.-Y. Wang +2
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textEvolutionary biologybioRxiv
  5. PAZy: an expanded and actively maintained database of experimentally validated plastic-active enzymes
    Golo Feuerriegel, Bjarne Ackers, Pablo Pérez-García +2
    Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyCrossref
BibTeX
@misc{calinjageman2026enhanced,
  title = {{Enhanced Sensitization Training in Aplysia Produces a Focused, Distinctive Set of Transcriptional Changes that Mostly Decays as Memory is Maintained}},
  author = {Irina Calin-Jageman and Jashui Zarate Torres and Theresa Wilsterman and Christian Gonzalez and Jaquelin Gutierrez and Carys McFaul and Nelly Musajeva and Zayra Juarez and Steven Proutsos and Octavian Calin-Jageman},
  howpublished = {PsyArXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.31234/osf.io/6kyjh_v1},
  url = {https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6kyjh_v1/},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Enhanced Sensitization Training in Aplysia Produces a Focused, Distinctive Set of Transcriptional Changes that Mostly Decays as Memory is Maintained
AU  - Irina Calin-Jageman
AU  - Jashui Zarate Torres
AU  - Theresa Wilsterman
AU  - Christian Gonzalez
AU  - Jaquelin Gutierrez
AU  - Carys McFaul
AU  - Nelly Musajeva
AU  - Zayra Juarez
AU  - Steven Proutsos
AU  - Octavian Calin-Jageman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/15
PB  - PsyArXiv
DO  - 10.31234/osf.io/6kyjh_v1
UR  - https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/6kyjh_v1/
AB  - Forgetting remains a key puzzle in the neurobiology of memory. One mysterious aspect of forgetting is its selectivity: most long-term memories are forgotten, becoming progressively less likely to be recalled, but extensive training can produce long-term memories that are readily expressed for a lifetime. What are the molecular mechanisms through which training forestalls forgetting? To explore this issue, we leveraged a well-documented training effect in long-term sensitization in Aplysia californica: a 1-day training protocol (standard) produces sensitization that is forgotten within 7 days, whereas 4-days of training (enhanced) produces sensitization that is durably expressed. Here we confirm that enhanced sensitization training produces an enduring form of sensitization, with only subtle levels of forgetting for up to 11 days after training. We then used microarray and qPCR to characterize the transcriptional changes occurring 1, 5, and 11 days after enhanced sensitization training. We find that enhanced sensitization sustains only about 6% of the transcriptional changes induced by standard training, with many memory-linked transcripts showing no (ApCREB1) or significantly weaker (ApEgr) regulation with additional training. Enhanced training also produces distinct activation of about 20 transcripts (relative to standard training), including up-regulation of putative homologs of genes related to synaptic plasticity (HINT1) and axon maintenance (zig-4). Surprisingly, most of the transcriptional changes initially accompanying enhanced training fade rapidly, with the typical training effect at day 1 declining to 45% as strong by day 5 and then 28% as strong by day 11. This decay is not complete, and we find sustained regulation of several transcripts, including some also persistently regulated by enhanced training (e.g. FMRFa and a putative GRIK1 homolog). Overall, our results suggest that additional training produces a weaker but somewhat distinctive transcriptional response, most of which fades well before memory expression.
ER  -