Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,086 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A Sharp Upper Bound for the Frobenius Number

Abstract

Let 0<a1<⋯<an be integers with n≥ 2 and gcd(a1,…,an)=1. Their Frobenius number F(a1,…,an) is the largest integer that cannot be expressed as a nonnegative integer combination of a1,…,an. Erdős and Graham proved the classical bound F(a1,…,an)≤ 2an−1⌊ an/n⌋−an, which depends on the two largest generators. Dixmier subsequently proved their conjecture F(a1,…,an)≤ an2/(n−1), a bound depending only on an and n that removes the factor $2$ from the corresponding quadratic estimate. Following the Erdős--Graham approach, we remove the factor $2$ while retaining the dependence on an−1, and prove F(a1,…,an)≤ an−1⌈ an/(n−1)⌉−an−1. This bound can be substantially smaller than Dixmier's when an−1 is small relative to an. For every n≥3, we also construct infinitely many instances satisfying the reverse inequality, which shows that the bound is sharp.

Related

  1. A sharp upper bound on the number of spanning forests of regular graphs
    T. Wu, S. Lu, X. Dong
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  2. A double-logarithmic upper bound on the chromatic number of the associahedron
    Sang-il Oum, David R. Wood
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  3. An upper bound of 61 for the Ramsey number $R(3,3,3,3)$
    Milos Tatarevic
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  4. The Tight Upper Bound on the Number of Distinct Squares in Circular Words
    Rikuya Hamai
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsarXiv
  5. A sharp almost sure upper bound for partial sums of random multiplicative functions
    Benjamin Durkan, Andrew Pearce-Crump
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryProbabilityarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{chen2026sharp,
  title = {{A Sharp Upper Bound for the Frobenius Number}},
  author = {Lin Chen and Tingwei Hu and Yuchen Mao and Guochuan Zhang},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.32219},
  eprint = {2610.32219},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32219},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Sharp Upper Bound for the Frobenius Number
AU  - Lin Chen
AU  - Tingwei Hu
AU  - Yuchen Mao
AU  - Guochuan Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/23
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.32219
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32219
AB  - Let 0<a_1<⋯<a_n be integers with n≥ 2 and gcd(a_1,…,a_n)=1. Their Frobenius number F(a_1,…,a_n) is the largest integer that cannot be expressed as a nonnegative integer combination of a_1,…,a_n. Erdős and Graham proved the classical bound F(a_1,…,a_n)≤ 2a_n−1⌊ a_n/n⌋−a_n, which depends on the two largest generators. Dixmier subsequently proved their conjecture F(a_1,…,a_n)≤ a_n^2/(n−1), a bound depending only on a_n and n that removes the factor $2$ from the corresponding quadratic estimate. Following the Erdős--Graham approach, we remove the factor $2$ while retaining the dependence on a_n−1, and prove F(a_1,…,a_n)≤ a_n−1⌈ a_n/(n−1)⌉−a_n−1. This bound can be substantially smaller than Dixmier's when a_n−1 is small relative to a_n. For every n≥3, we also construct infinitely many instances satisfying the reverse inequality, which shows that the bound is sharp.
ER  -