Impact of Isolation Techniques on the Content of Small Extracellular Vesicles
9 affiliations
- 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong SAR
- 2JC STEM Lab of Personalised Cancer Medicine, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
- 3Faculty of Health, School of Biomedical Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia
- 4QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane Queensland Australia
- 5Division of Interdisciplinary Genetics and Nanomedicine, Research Center for Drug Discovery Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy Tokyo Japan
- 6Human Biology‐Microbiome‐Quantum Research Center (WPI‐Bio2Q) Keio University Tokyo Japan
- 7Department of Pathology, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
- 8Materials Innovation Institute for Life Sciences and Energy HKU‐SIRI Shenzhen China
- 9State Key Laboratory of Liver Research The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR
Abstract
An important topic of discussion amongst the extracellular vesicle (EV) research field is which genetic materials are considered true constituents of EV cargo. What were once regarded as non-EV components have now evolved to be potentially essential to EV composition, serving as key mediators in communication. Researchers continue to pursue varying methods for the isolation of EVs with the desired content. However, the desired content depends on the source and the requirements of the intended downstream use of EVs. Different isolation methods can modify EV cargo, impacting functional EV-induced effects and analysis of EV contents. Ensuring that any result produced is truly representative of EVs and not of co-isolated materials is imperative. Here, we describe a side-by-side comparison of the outcomes of EV isolation from plasma of healthy individuals, using size exclusion chromatography and an ultrafast filtration system. Characterisation of EVs was performed by particle (nanoparticle tracking analysis), protein (Bradford assay) and lipid (sulfo-phospho-vanillin assay) quantification, morphology visualisation (transmission electron microscopy), microRNA expression (miRNA sequencing) and assessment of protein absence or presence (traditional and capillary-based western blot analyses, ELISA and mass spectrometry). To our surprise, the isolation methods employed identified significant differences in the protein abundance and composition of the resulting EVs. SEC isolated plasma EVs with high abundance of EV transmembrane and cytosolic markers, as well as corona-related complement, fibrinogen and extracellular matrix proteins. However, this was accompanied by high quantities of non-EV immunoglobulins. In contrast, UFF isolated plasma EVs with high abundance of EV integrins and corona-related complement proteins, albeit with high lipoprotein abundance. Each isolation approach produces EVs with different biomolecular properties, which might provide specific advantages and disadvantages, depending on the intended use of EVs. Therefore, isolation methods need to be tested intensively and selected carefully for downstream applications.
Related
- Human salivary extracellular vesicles: A comparative study of isolation techniques
- Isolation of blood-derived extracellular vesicles for disease diagnosis: Methods, challenges, and applications
- Identification of candidate markers for the isolation of neuron-specific extracellular vesicles
- Tissue‐Specific Isolation of Hepatocyte Extracellular Vesicles From Human Plasma Enables Tissue‐Resolved Proteomic and miRNA Profiling
- Controllable Cascade Aggregation Ion Programmed Nanomachines and Simple Isolation Enable Tumor‐Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles Detection for Enhanced Breast Cancer Assessment
BibTeX
@article{su2026impact,
title = {{Impact of Isolation Techniques on the Content of Small Extracellular Vesicles}},
author = {Yue Su and Kekoolani S. Visan and Sarah Voss and Marta Prieto‐Vila and Juntaro Matsuzaki and Jason Ying Kuen Chan and Judy Wai Ping Yam and Andreas Möller},
journal = {Journal of Extracellular Vesicles},
year = {2026},
month = may,
doi = {10.1002/jev2.70290},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.70290},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Impact of Isolation Techniques on the Content of Small Extracellular Vesicles
AU - Yue Su
AU - Kekoolani S. Visan
AU - Sarah Voss
AU - Marta Prieto‐Vila
AU - Juntaro Matsuzaki
AU - Jason Ying Kuen Chan
AU - Judy Wai Ping Yam
AU - Andreas Möller
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/05/28
JO - Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
DO - 10.1002/jev2.70290
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.70290
AB - An important topic of discussion amongst the extracellular vesicle (EV) research field is which genetic materials are considered true constituents of EV cargo. What were once regarded as non-EV components have now evolved to be potentially essential to EV composition, serving as key mediators in communication. Researchers continue to pursue varying methods for the isolation of EVs with the desired content. However, the desired content depends on the source and the requirements of the intended downstream use of EVs. Different isolation methods can modify EV cargo, impacting functional EV-induced effects and analysis of EV contents. Ensuring that any result produced is truly representative of EVs and not of co-isolated materials is imperative. Here, we describe a side-by-side comparison of the outcomes of EV isolation from plasma of healthy individuals, using size exclusion chromatography and an ultrafast filtration system. Characterisation of EVs was performed by particle (nanoparticle tracking analysis), protein (Bradford assay) and lipid (sulfo-phospho-vanillin assay) quantification, morphology visualisation (transmission electron microscopy), microRNA expression (miRNA sequencing) and assessment of protein absence or presence (traditional and capillary-based western blot analyses, ELISA and mass spectrometry). To our surprise, the isolation methods employed identified significant differences in the protein abundance and composition of the resulting EVs. SEC isolated plasma EVs with high abundance of EV transmembrane and cytosolic markers, as well as corona-related complement, fibrinogen and extracellular matrix proteins. However, this was accompanied by high quantities of non-EV immunoglobulins. In contrast, UFF isolated plasma EVs with high abundance of EV integrins and corona-related complement proteins, albeit with high lipoprotein abundance. Each isolation approach produces EVs with different biomolecular properties, which might provide specific advantages and disadvantages, depending on the intended use of EVs. Therefore, isolation methods need to be tested intensively and selected carefully for downstream applications.
SN - 2001-3078
ER -