Human salivary extracellular vesicles: A comparative study of isolation techniques
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Corresponding author
- 2Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- 3Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- 4Institute & Core Facility of Translational Proteomics, Biochemical/Pharmacological Centre, Marburg University, Marburg, Germany
- 5Institute of Functional and Clinical Anatomy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
Abstract
Saliva offers a valuable source of analyte for extracellular vesicle (EV)-based biomarker research. However, due to the complex composition of saliva, the isolation of salivary EVs remains technically challenging. The aim of our study is to systematically compare three salivary EV isolation techniques by assessing the obtained EV sample quality and quantity and to highlight differences between the three methods with respect to costs, isolation time, and potential for parallel sample handling (i.e., sample throughput). For the enrichment of EVs, we used three EV isolation techniques with saliva samples of four healthy donors: polymer precipitation, membrane affinity (MA), and size-exclusion chromatography. The vesicles obtained were characterized via transmission electron microscopy, SDS-PAGE and Western blot, and conventional nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and interferometric nanoparticle tracking analysis (iNTA). Our results indicate that all isolation methods resulted in successful enrichment of EVs of similar size distribution. However, we observed differences with respect to vesicle yield and detectability of positive EV markers, potentially reflecting differences in vesicle integrity and sample purity. Assessment of particle number via NTA and iNTA approaches revealed prominent differences in EV number of MA samples but not in the case of samples prepared with other enrichment methods, highlighting the importance of the choice of analysis method. Our study highlights advantages and potential shortcomings of three salivary EV isolation approaches and calls attention to the importance of multimodal analysis of EV samples, combining approaches for EV marker detection, imaging, NTA, and iNTA.
Related
- Impact of Isolation Techniques on the Content of Small Extracellular Vesicles
- Salivary extracellular vesicles in precision periodontology: diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic opportunities.
- Isolation of blood-derived extracellular vesicles for disease diagnosis: Methods, challenges, and applications
- Identification of candidate markers for the isolation of neuron-specific extracellular vesicles
- Tissue‐Specific Isolation of Hepatocyte Extracellular Vesicles From Human Plasma Enables Tissue‐Resolved Proteomic and miRNA Profiling
BibTeX
@article{boros2026human,
title = {{Human salivary extracellular vesicles: A comparative study of isolation techniques}},
author = {Fanni Annamária Boros and Alexandra Gentschev and Jan Van Deun and Witold Szymanski and Johannes Graumann and Martin Regensburger and Philipp Arnold and Friederike Zunke},
journal = {Biophysical Reports},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.bpr.2026.100292},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpr.2026.100292},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Human salivary extracellular vesicles: A comparative study of isolation techniques
AU - Fanni Annamária Boros
AU - Alexandra Gentschev
AU - Jan Van Deun
AU - Witold Szymanski
AU - Johannes Graumann
AU - Martin Regensburger
AU - Philipp Arnold
AU - Friederike Zunke
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/09
JO - Biophysical Reports
DO - 10.1016/j.bpr.2026.100292
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpr.2026.100292
AB - Saliva offers a valuable source of analyte for extracellular vesicle (EV)-based biomarker research. However, due to the complex composition of saliva, the isolation of salivary EVs remains technically challenging. The aim of our study is to systematically compare three salivary EV isolation techniques by assessing the obtained EV sample quality and quantity and to highlight differences between the three methods with respect to costs, isolation time, and potential for parallel sample handling (i.e., sample throughput). For the enrichment of EVs, we used three EV isolation techniques with saliva samples of four healthy donors: polymer precipitation, membrane affinity (MA), and size-exclusion chromatography. The vesicles obtained were characterized via transmission electron microscopy, SDS-PAGE and Western blot, and conventional nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and interferometric nanoparticle tracking analysis (iNTA). Our results indicate that all isolation methods resulted in successful enrichment of EVs of similar size distribution. However, we observed differences with respect to vesicle yield and detectability of positive EV markers, potentially reflecting differences in vesicle integrity and sample purity. Assessment of particle number via NTA and iNTA approaches revealed prominent differences in EV number of MA samples but not in the case of samples prepared with other enrichment methods, highlighting the importance of the choice of analysis method. Our study highlights advantages and potential shortcomings of three salivary EV isolation approaches and calls attention to the importance of multimodal analysis of EV samples, combining approaches for EV marker detection, imaging, NTA, and iNTA.
SN - 2667-0747
ER -