Cultural Adaptation in Physical Therapy: A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence and Practices.
- 1The Center for Victims of Torture, Saint Paul, MN 55114, USA.
- 2Divisions of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The cultural adaptation of physical therapy interventions has been widely recommended, yet the literature remains limited, heterogeneous, and unevenly reported. This scoping review maps the literature on culturally adapted physical therapy and identifies adaptation strategies, key characteristics of the evidence base, and gaps relevant to education and practice. Methods: A scoping review of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Elicit (2000-2026) identified 37 peer-reviewed articles on the cultural adaptation of physical therapy. Searches were supplemented by backward and forward citation tracking. Guided by PRISMA-ScR reporting standards, data were charted on study design, article type, populations, outcomes, and reported cultural adaptation approaches. Results: Thirty-seven articles were identified, including experimental, non-experimental quantitative, qualitative, and non-empirical sources. The literature was published primarily after 2017 and reflected substantial heterogeneity in populations, intervention types, and outcomes. Five experimental studies were identified, which assessed patient activation, attendance, adherence, pain-related suffering, pain severity, physical function, and health literacy. Reported findings were mixed, with some studies noting improvements in implementation-related or patient-reported outcomes and others reporting no significant differences across clinical outcomes. Additional evidence came from eight non-experimental quantitative studies and twelve qualitative studies. Adaptation strategies included language, content, and intervention adaptation; addressing norms, values, and context considerations; reconciling explanatory models of health and illness; engaging cultural experts; and training for providers. Discussion and Conclusions: This scoping review found that the literature on culturally adapted physical therapy is limited, methodologically heterogeneous, and uneven across intervention types and populations. There is a need for methodologically robust and systematically reported research to clarify adaptation approaches, inform education and practice, and support the development of adaptation frameworks. Strengthening this evidence base may help inform future education policy, clinical guidance, and culturally adapted physical therapy care.
Related
- Impact of Perceived Cultural Beliefs and Traditional Practices on Oral Health: An Evidence based Mixed Method Approach
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an expanded Chinese version of the training needs analysis questionnaire: evidence from rural-oriented general practitioners in Chongqing, China
- Is empathy-driven teaching effective in cultural product design? An empirical study on students’ empathy and design creativity
- Turkish Adaptation of the Halitosis Associated Life-Quality Test (HALT-TR): Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Initial Psychometric Evaluation in Adults with Self-Perceived Halitosis
- Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and arabic translation of the rhinoplasty outcome evaluation
BibTeX
@article{esala2026cultural,
title = {{Cultural Adaptation in Physical Therapy: A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence and Practices.}},
author = {Jennifer J Esala and Ilona Fricker and Laura Pizer Gueron and Jepkemoi J Kibet and Sarah Lawrence and Sara Pearce and Ida Tchuisseu Fonkoue},
journal = {Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/healthcare14193317},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881756},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Cultural Adaptation in Physical Therapy: A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence and Practices.
AU - Jennifer J Esala
AU - Ilona Fricker
AU - Laura Pizer Gueron
AU - Jepkemoi J Kibet
AU - Sarah Lawrence
AU - Sara Pearce
AU - Ida Tchuisseu Fonkoue
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/05
JO - Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/healthcare14193317
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42881756
AB - Background and Purpose: The cultural adaptation of physical therapy interventions has been widely recommended, yet the literature remains limited, heterogeneous, and unevenly reported. This scoping review maps the literature on culturally adapted physical therapy and identifies adaptation strategies, key characteristics of the evidence base, and gaps relevant to education and practice. Methods: A scoping review of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Elicit (2000-2026) identified 37 peer-reviewed articles on the cultural adaptation of physical therapy. Searches were supplemented by backward and forward citation tracking. Guided by PRISMA-ScR reporting standards, data were charted on study design, article type, populations, outcomes, and reported cultural adaptation approaches. Results: Thirty-seven articles were identified, including experimental, non-experimental quantitative, qualitative, and non-empirical sources. The literature was published primarily after 2017 and reflected substantial heterogeneity in populations, intervention types, and outcomes. Five experimental studies were identified, which assessed patient activation, attendance, adherence, pain-related suffering, pain severity, physical function, and health literacy. Reported findings were mixed, with some studies noting improvements in implementation-related or patient-reported outcomes and others reporting no significant differences across clinical outcomes. Additional evidence came from eight non-experimental quantitative studies and twelve qualitative studies. Adaptation strategies included language, content, and intervention adaptation; addressing norms, values, and context considerations; reconciling explanatory models of health and illness; engaging cultural experts; and training for providers. Discussion and Conclusions: This scoping review found that the literature on culturally adapted physical therapy is limited, methodologically heterogeneous, and uneven across intervention types and populations. There is a need for methodologically robust and systematically reported research to clarify adaptation approaches, inform education and practice, and support the development of adaptation frameworks. Strengthening this evidence base may help inform future education policy, clinical guidance, and culturally adapted physical therapy care.
SN - 2227-9032
ER -