Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 56 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCommunications Medicine

Impact of methicillin resistance on mortality in Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  1. 1Division of Infectious Diseases (Department of General Medicine), All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a leading cause of endocarditis with poor outcomes. The magnitude and consistency of its mortality risk compared with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) remain uncertain. Methods Data were extracted from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from database inception to 30 November 2025, without language restrictions. A random-effects model (Restricted Maximum-Likelihood) was used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs). Heterogeneity was explored by stratified and meta-regression analyses. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot symmetry and Egger’s regression. Results Twenty-four studies, comprising 3291 patients (1,011 with MRSA and 2280 with MSSA), met the inclusion criteria. Pooled short-term mortality was significantly higher in MRSA endocarditis (30.9% vs 25.6%; RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.21-1.80; I² = 34%). Across stratified analyses by study design, setting, region, and study era, mortality remained consistently higher in MRSA endocarditis. No significant differences were found for heart failure (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90-1.30), embolic events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.51-1.33), stroke (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00), or surgery performed (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.56-1.68) in MRSA and MSSA groups. No publication bias was revealed by Funnel-plot inspection and Egger’s test (p = 0.082). Meta-regression showed no effect modification by age, hospital-acquired infection, prosthetic valve, or right-sided endocarditis. Conclusions MRSA endocarditis carries a significantly higher short-term mortality than MSSA, consistent across study designs and study-level characteristics. The major complications were comparable between the two groups.

Related

  1. From Heart Murmur to Bone Involvement: Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis With First-Rib Osteomyelitis in a Patient With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia
    Tanner Besse, Rodolfo Loureiro, Nicholena Richardson +1
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. A Duplex Isothermal RPA–Lateral Flow Platform for Concurrent Detection of Staphylococcus Aureus and mecA-Mediated Methicillin Resistance
    Jutturong Ckumdee, Somchai Santiwatanakul, Kwanchai Onruang +1
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCDOAJ
  3. Correlation between phenotypic disc diffusion test and PCR molecular test for detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus hominis.
    Lorena Gonzalez-Lopez, Ruben Morelos-Ramirez, Roberto Cabrera
    Journal of medical microbiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCPMC
  4. High prevalence and multidrug resistance of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a provincial referral hospital in Zambia: A 5-year retrospective study
    Mavis S. Nyakayoya, Dennis Chisala, Kennedy Lubundi +4
    PLOS Global Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPharmacology & toxicologyPLOS
  5. Cefazolin versus Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    F. Pozzebon, G. Pacheco, G. Cabral +3
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textInfectious diseasemedRxiv
BibTeX
@article{meena2026impact,
  title = {{Impact of methicillin resistance on mortality in Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
  author = {Durga Shankar Meena and Deepak Kumar and Gopal Krishana Bohra},
  journal = {Communications Medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = jun,
  doi = {10.1038/s43856-026-01746-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01746-9},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Impact of methicillin resistance on mortality in Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU  - Durga Shankar Meena
AU  - Deepak Kumar
AU  - Gopal Krishana Bohra
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/06/01
JO  - Communications Medicine
DO  - 10.1038/s43856-026-01746-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01746-9
AB  - Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a leading cause of endocarditis with poor outcomes. The magnitude and consistency of its mortality risk compared with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) remain uncertain. Methods Data were extracted from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from database inception to 30 November 2025, without language restrictions. A random-effects model (Restricted Maximum-Likelihood) was used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs). Heterogeneity was explored by stratified and meta-regression analyses. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plot symmetry and Egger’s regression. Results Twenty-four studies, comprising 3291 patients (1,011 with MRSA and 2280 with MSSA), met the inclusion criteria. Pooled short-term mortality was significantly higher in MRSA endocarditis (30.9% vs 25.6%; RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.21-1.80; I² = 34%). Across stratified analyses by study design, setting, region, and study era, mortality remained consistently higher in MRSA endocarditis. No significant differences were found for heart failure (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.90-1.30), embolic events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.51-1.33), stroke (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00), or surgery performed (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.56-1.68) in MRSA and MSSA groups. No publication bias was revealed by Funnel-plot inspection and Egger’s test (p = 0.082). Meta-regression showed no effect modification by age, hospital-acquired infection, prosthetic valve, or right-sided endocarditis. Conclusions MRSA endocarditis carries a significantly higher short-term mortality than MSSA, consistent across study designs and study-level characteristics. The major complications were comparable between the two groups.
SN  - 2730-664X
ER  -