Collaborative Care and Everyday Planning in Care Counselling (CoPlan study): study protocol of a pragmatic randomized clinical trial and protocol changes to quasi-experimental evaluation during recruitment
Abstract
Background: Family members are the primary source of support for older care recipients. Promoting cooperative strategies between family members may foster shared solutions to care-related challenges. Based on our previous research we developed a dyadic problem-solving intervention that equally addresses the needs of both caregivers and care recipients.
Methods: This pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of the intervention under routine conditions within a national care counselling service setting. Due to recruitment obstacles and low participant enrolment the randomized design was modified to a non-randomized study. Main inclusion criterion for caregivers was a positive screening of desire to change the care situation, frequent caregiving challenges, or difficulty managing care. Participants are assigned to either the CoPlan intervention or control group with routine care counselling. Self-reported questionnaires are administered at baseline ( t ₀ ) and 3 months post-intervention ( t ₂ ) to collect endpoint data, with an intermediate non-endpoint assessment following the initial counselling ( t ₁ ). Primary and secondary endpoint comparisons are based on data collected at t ₂ controlled for baseline values. Primary outcome is the quality of informal care (QiC), main secondary outcomes include caregiver self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, and positive aspects of caregiving. A process evaluation assesses intervention dose, fidelity, and experiences of interventionists, care counsellors of a German long-term care insurance, and participants.
Discussion: This study represents one of the few translational studies in care counselling research. By promoting shared appraisals and open communication in a dyadic approach, the novel counselling method addresses a largely underexplored area. The difficulty in recruiting participants through care counsellors, along with the resulting study design modification, highlights the difficulties of conducting studies within real-world practice settings.
Trial registration: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German Clinical Trials Register), DRKS00032492 . Registered on 5 September 2023 (current status: recruitment completed).
Related
- A quasi-experimental evaluation of one-to-one counselling to improve mental health and education outcomes amongst school pupils in England, Scotland and Wales
- Evaluation of a Structured Educational Program for Community Pharmacists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Satisfaction Toward Diabetes Patient-Centered Care: A Non-Randomized Quasi-Experimental Study.
- A randomized controlled trial of a multidisciplinary collaborative fatigue management program for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: study protocol
- A theory-driven mobile application based on iterative collaborative design principles to support depression self-management in older adults: development and usability evaluation of “Mind Garden”
- Strategies for recruitment and retention of underrepresented populations in randomized clinical trials in the United States: A mixed-methods study.
BibTeX
@article{hendlmeier2026collaborative,
title = {{Collaborative Care and Everyday Planning in Care Counselling (CoPlan study): study protocol of a pragmatic randomized clinical trial and protocol changes to quasi-experimental evaluation during recruitment}},
author = {Ingrid Hendlmeier and Martina Schäufele and Petra Meuer and Gisela Büchele and Ana Babac and Klaus Pfeiffer},
journal = {Trials},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.1186/s13063-026-10039-4},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-026-10039-4},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Collaborative Care and Everyday Planning in Care Counselling (CoPlan study): study protocol of a pragmatic randomized clinical trial and protocol changes to quasi-experimental evaluation during recruitment
AU - Ingrid Hendlmeier
AU - Martina Schäufele
AU - Petra Meuer
AU - Gisela Büchele
AU - Ana Babac
AU - Klaus Pfeiffer
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/03
JO - Trials
DO - 10.1186/s13063-026-10039-4
UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-026-10039-4
AB - Background: Family members are the primary source of support for older care recipients. Promoting cooperative strategies between family members may foster shared solutions to care-related challenges. Based on our previous research we developed a dyadic problem-solving intervention that equally addresses the needs of both caregivers and care recipients. Methods: This pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of the intervention under routine conditions within a national care counselling service setting. Due to recruitment obstacles and low participant enrolment the randomized design was modified to a non-randomized study. Main inclusion criterion for caregivers was a positive screening of desire to change the care situation, frequent caregiving challenges, or difficulty managing care. Participants are assigned to either the CoPlan intervention or control group with routine care counselling. Self-reported questionnaires are administered at baseline ( t ₀ ) and 3 months post-intervention ( t ₂ ) to collect endpoint data, with an intermediate non-endpoint assessment following the initial counselling ( t ₁ ). Primary and secondary endpoint comparisons are based on data collected at t ₂ controlled for baseline values. Primary outcome is the quality of informal care (QiC), main secondary outcomes include caregiver self-efficacy, depressive symptoms, and positive aspects of caregiving. A process evaluation assesses intervention dose, fidelity, and experiences of interventionists, care counsellors of a German long-term care insurance, and participants. Discussion: This study represents one of the few translational studies in care counselling research. By promoting shared appraisals and open communication in a dyadic approach, the novel counselling method addresses a largely underexplored area. The difficulty in recruiting participants through care counsellors, along with the resulting study design modification, highlights the difficulties of conducting studies within real-world practice settings. Trial registration: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (German Clinical Trials Register), DRKS00032492 . Registered on 5 September 2023 (current status: recruitment completed).
SN - 1745-6215
ER -