Development, temporal stability, and prognostic discrimination of a dynamic functional-nutritional score and its trajectories in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract
BackgroundConventional functional assessment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) relies largely on baseline performance status and may not fully characterize longitudinal changes in functional and nutritional measures. We constructed a dynamic functional-nutritional score (DFNS) integrating serum albumin, handgrip strength, 6-m gait speed, and reverse-coded Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and examined its temporal stability, longitudinal trajectories, and association with subsequent overall survival (OS).MethodsIn this single-center retrospective cohort study, 461 patients with stage III–IV NSCLC receiving systemic therapy were included. DFNS coefficients were derived using baseline principal component analysis (PCA) and applied to measurements obtained at baseline and Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24. Temporal stability was assessed by cosine similarity between baseline and follow-up PCA coefficient vectors. Latent class growth analysis (LCGA) characterized longitudinal DFNS trajectories. A Week 24 landmark design was used to examine post-landmark OS. Cox proportional hazards models, Harrell’s C-index, and 52-week time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess prognostic discrimination relative to baseline ECOG PS and individual DFNS components.ResultsThe first principal component explained 37.6%–40.2% of total variance across assessment points, with high similarity between follow-up and baseline coefficient vectors (cosine similarity, 0.952–0.982). LCGA identified three trajectories: High and Stable (Class 1, 60.1%), Decline–Recovery (Class 2, 32.1%), and Persistently Low (Class 3, 7.8%). In the Week 24 landmark analysis, Class 3 was associated with a higher estimated hazard of death than Class 1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.84; 95% CI, 1.69 – 4.78; P<.001). The DFNS trajectory model showed higher observed discrimination than the baseline ECOG PS and 4-component models, with C-indices of 0.742, 0.612, and 0.685, respectively, and 52-week AUCs of 0.768, 0.625, and 0.702, respectively.ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort, the DFNS component structure showed temporal stability over 24 weeks, and longitudinal DFNS trajectories were associated with subsequent OS after the Week 24 landmark. The trajectory-based model showed greater observed prognostic discrimination than models based on baseline ECOG PS or individual components. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the reproducibility and clinical utility of longitudinal DFNS assessment.
Related
- Development and Population-Based Prognostic Utility Assessment of an ICD-10-CM-Based Prediction Model to Identify Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Discrimination Performance and Population-Based Evaluation in 83,357 Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Analysis of Risk Factors and Development of a Predictive Model for 1-Year Mortality After Acute Hip Fracture Surgery in Patients Aged ≥80 Years: The Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Potential Predictor.
- Nutritional and bioactive diversity of mangrove fruits: a comparative perspective for functional food development
- Interpretable Machine Learning Prognostic Model Integrating Inflammatory-Nutritional Biomarkers for Post-Prostatectomy Biochemical Recurrence: Development, Internal Validation, and Translational Target Exploration.
- Multimodal integration of carotid plaque ultrasound radiomics and dynamic systemic immune-inflammation trajectories for subacute risk stratification after stroke thrombectomy: development and internal validation of an exploratory prognostic model
BibTeX
@article{jiang2026development,
title = {{Development, temporal stability, and prognostic discrimination of a dynamic functional-nutritional score and its trajectories in advanced non-small cell lung cancer}},
author = {Xi Jiang and Yongcun Wu and Xuepin Yao and Yan Liang},
journal = {Frontiers in Oncology},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1905098},
url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1905098},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Development, temporal stability, and prognostic discrimination of a dynamic functional-nutritional score and its trajectories in advanced non-small cell lung cancer
AU - Xi Jiang
AU - Yongcun Wu
AU - Xuepin Yao
AU - Yan Liang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/04
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1905098
UR - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1905098
AB - BackgroundConventional functional assessment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) relies largely on baseline performance status and may not fully characterize longitudinal changes in functional and nutritional measures. We constructed a dynamic functional-nutritional score (DFNS) integrating serum albumin, handgrip strength, 6-m gait speed, and reverse-coded Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and examined its temporal stability, longitudinal trajectories, and association with subsequent overall survival (OS).MethodsIn this single-center retrospective cohort study, 461 patients with stage III–IV NSCLC receiving systemic therapy were included. DFNS coefficients were derived using baseline principal component analysis (PCA) and applied to measurements obtained at baseline and Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 24. Temporal stability was assessed by cosine similarity between baseline and follow-up PCA coefficient vectors. Latent class growth analysis (LCGA) characterized longitudinal DFNS trajectories. A Week 24 landmark design was used to examine post-landmark OS. Cox proportional hazards models, Harrell’s C-index, and 52-week time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess prognostic discrimination relative to baseline ECOG PS and individual DFNS components.ResultsThe first principal component explained 37.6%–40.2% of total variance across assessment points, with high similarity between follow-up and baseline coefficient vectors (cosine similarity, 0.952–0.982). LCGA identified three trajectories: High and Stable (Class 1, 60.1%), Decline–Recovery (Class 2, 32.1%), and Persistently Low (Class 3, 7.8%). In the Week 24 landmark analysis, Class 3 was associated with a higher estimated hazard of death than Class 1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.84; 95% CI, 1.69 – 4.78; P<.001). The DFNS trajectory model showed higher observed discrimination than the baseline ECOG PS and 4-component models, with C-indices of 0.742, 0.612, and 0.685, respectively, and 52-week AUCs of 0.768, 0.625, and 0.702, respectively.ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort, the DFNS component structure showed temporal stability over 24 weeks, and longitudinal DFNS trajectories were associated with subsequent OS after the Week 24 landmark. The trajectory-based model showed greater observed prognostic discrimination than models based on baseline ECOG PS or individual components. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the reproducibility and clinical utility of longitudinal DFNS assessment.
SN - 2234-943X
ER -