Integrating portable air cleaners to reduce mechanical ventilation energy under CO₂-based control: Twin-chamber experiments and multi-city analysis of energy–IAQ trade-offs
- 1College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
- 2Human-Oriented Built Environment Lab, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
- 3College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China; Key Laboratory of Performance Evolution and Control for Engineering Structures of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; Corresponding author.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation (MV) in public buildings is typically designed for minimum ventilation rates, which challenges the global carbon-reduction goals. While portable air cleaners (PACs) are widely used as supplementary devices, their potential as partial substitutes for ventilation—maintaining acceptable indoor air quality (IAQ) with reduced energy demand—remains underexplored. This study integrated controlled twin-chamber experiments with multi-city modelling to quantify energy-IAQ trade-offs of MV and PAC systems at different air change rates (ACHs) and explore integrated MV–PAC strategies. The experiments aimed to: (1) quantify the cleaning performance and energy burden of MV-only and PAC-only systems across representative pollutants (ultrafine particles, PM 0.3–10 , ozone, TVOC, and benzene series) using the Levenberg–Marquardt optimization; (2) assess the effects of air distribution, ACH, and emission sources; and (3) validate a theoretical MV–PAC coupling model. Five scenarios were developed based on CO₂-derived clean air demand, each representing a different PAC-to-MV substitution ratio. Two key decision factors—the dominant pollutant type and the indoor–outdoor enthalpy difference—were applied to analyze system performance across 15 cities spanning various climate zones and seasons. Results indicated that both MV and PAC systems removed particles more effectively than ozone, with PAC performance sensitive to ACH and more effective when indoor emissions dominated. Integrated MV-PAC system achieved up to 50 % energy savings in summer while maintaining pollutant removal above 80 %, with optimal configurations varying by climate and pollutant profiles. These findings support informed decision-making for integrating PACs with MV systems, promoting more flexible and energy-efficient ventilation strategies.
Related
- A simplified method for evaluating fine particulate matter removal performance of portable air cleaners
- Driving pressure, simplified elastic mechanical power, and time to liberation from mechanical ventilation: a competing-risks and time-anchored observational study
- Mechanical ventilation in acute brain injury
- Global Protective Ventilator Settings Are Not Regional Protection: A Compartment-Resolved Framework for Personalizing Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- Mechanical ventilation–associated AKI: toward a multimodal and kidney-protective ventilatory framework
BibTeX
@article{li2026integrating,
title = {{Integrating portable air cleaners to reduce mechanical ventilation energy under CO₂-based control: Twin-chamber experiments and multi-city analysis of energy–IAQ trade-offs}},
author = {Yiqun Li and Mingqi Liu and Bowen Du and Wei Ye and Xu Zhang},
journal = {Energy and Built Environment},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.enbenv.2026.02.001},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2026.02.001},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Integrating portable air cleaners to reduce mechanical ventilation energy under CO₂-based control: Twin-chamber experiments and multi-city analysis of energy–IAQ trade-offs
AU - Yiqun Li
AU - Mingqi Liu
AU - Bowen Du
AU - Wei Ye
AU - Xu Zhang
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Energy and Built Environment
DO - 10.1016/j.enbenv.2026.02.001
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2026.02.001
AB - Mechanical ventilation (MV) in public buildings is typically designed for minimum ventilation rates, which challenges the global carbon-reduction goals. While portable air cleaners (PACs) are widely used as supplementary devices, their potential as partial substitutes for ventilation—maintaining acceptable indoor air quality (IAQ) with reduced energy demand—remains underexplored. This study integrated controlled twin-chamber experiments with multi-city modelling to quantify energy-IAQ trade-offs of MV and PAC systems at different air change rates (ACHs) and explore integrated MV–PAC strategies. The experiments aimed to: (1) quantify the cleaning performance and energy burden of MV-only and PAC-only systems across representative pollutants (ultrafine particles, PM 0.3–10 , ozone, TVOC, and benzene series) using the Levenberg–Marquardt optimization; (2) assess the effects of air distribution, ACH, and emission sources; and (3) validate a theoretical MV–PAC coupling model. Five scenarios were developed based on CO₂-derived clean air demand, each representing a different PAC-to-MV substitution ratio. Two key decision factors—the dominant pollutant type and the indoor–outdoor enthalpy difference—were applied to analyze system performance across 15 cities spanning various climate zones and seasons. Results indicated that both MV and PAC systems removed particles more effectively than ozone, with PAC performance sensitive to ACH and more effective when indoor emissions dominated. Integrated MV-PAC system achieved up to 50 % energy savings in summer while maintaining pollutant removal above 80 %, with optimal configurations varying by climate and pollutant profiles. These findings support informed decision-making for integrating PACs with MV systems, promoting more flexible and energy-efficient ventilation strategies.
SN - 2666-1233
ER -