A simplified method for evaluating fine particulate matter removal performance of portable air cleaners
- 1Environmental Engineering Program, University of Colorado Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO, 80309-0607, USA
- 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 1111 Engineering Drive, Boulder, CO, 80309-0427, USA
Abstract
A simplified method for evaluating the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) removal efficiency of portable air cleaners is presented to support community-engaged research and citizen science. Clean air delivery rate (CADR) values measured in a residence with low-cost sensors were ≈ 26% lower than laboratory measurements obtained using research-grade instruments, providing conservative estimates of air cleaner performance. Ten portable air cleaners (PACs), including seven homemade ("DIY") prototypes and three commercial models, were evaluated for physical and economic performance. A four-filter Corsi-Rosenthal box achieved the highest PM2.5 removal performance among the DIY prototypes and adding a fan shroud increased CADR by ≈ 11%. A single 102-mm MERV 13 filter attached to a box fan also produced high CADR values with a compact form factor and low initial cost. Additional tests indicated minimal concerns related to motor temperature and power consumption during residential operation. Analysis of 135 DIY and commercial PAC models showed substantially lower initial cost per CADR unit for DIY models compared to commercial units. This method includes three main elements:•Introducing a short-lived particle source, such as a medical nebulizer, in a well-sealed room.•Measuring PM2.5 concentrations with and without the air cleaner running.•Calculating CADR values using particle decay rates.
Related
- Integrating portable air cleaners to reduce mechanical ventilation energy under CO₂-based control: Twin-chamber experiments and multi-city analysis of energy–IAQ trade-offs
- SCORES (Selection of Clinical Observations for Risk Evaluation Scores): Impact of Heart Rate Selection on Simplified Geneva Score Performance in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
- Evaluating uncertainty for detecting performance loss and guiding deferral after model transfer between hospital systems
- Evaluating COPD care assistance: a comparative study of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and ERNIE bot performance.
- Performance of compressed-sensing cardiac accelerated cine MR in evaluating left ventricular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{martin2026simplified,
title = {{A simplified method for evaluating fine particulate matter removal performance of portable air cleaners}},
author = {Andrew B. Martin and Sumit Sankhyan and Rileigh L. Robertson and Marina E. Vance},
journal = {MethodsX},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1016/j.mex.2026.104216},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13718843},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A simplified method for evaluating fine particulate matter removal performance of portable air cleaners
AU - Andrew B. Martin
AU - Sumit Sankhyan
AU - Rileigh L. Robertson
AU - Marina E. Vance
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/17
JO - MethodsX
DO - 10.1016/j.mex.2026.104216
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13718843
AB - A simplified method for evaluating the fine particulate matter (PM2.5) removal efficiency of portable air cleaners is presented to support community-engaged research and citizen science. Clean air delivery rate (CADR) values measured in a residence with low-cost sensors were ≈ 26% lower than laboratory measurements obtained using research-grade instruments, providing conservative estimates of air cleaner performance. Ten portable air cleaners (PACs), including seven homemade ("DIY") prototypes and three commercial models, were evaluated for physical and economic performance. A four-filter Corsi-Rosenthal box achieved the highest PM2.5 removal performance among the DIY prototypes and adding a fan shroud increased CADR by ≈ 11%. A single 102-mm MERV 13 filter attached to a box fan also produced high CADR values with a compact form factor and low initial cost. Additional tests indicated minimal concerns related to motor temperature and power consumption during residential operation. Analysis of 135 DIY and commercial PAC models showed substantially lower initial cost per CADR unit for DIY models compared to commercial units. This method includes three main elements:•Introducing a short-lived particle source, such as a medical nebulizer, in a well-sealed room.•Measuring PM2.5 concentrations with and without the air cleaner running.•Calculating CADR values using particle decay rates.
SN - 2215-0161
ER -