Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Molecules

Micropropagation of the Endemic Stachys pinardii Boiss. and Comparative Investigation of the Phytochemical Composition of Cultured and Wild-Grown Plants

  1. 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Turkey

Abstract

This study aimed to establish an efficient micropropagation protocol for the endemic plant Stachys pinardii Boiss. and to characterize differences in specialized metabolite profiles between in vitro-derived and wild plants under the tested conditions. Nodal explants were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with different cytokinin (BAP, KIN) and auxin (IAA, NAA) combinations, with morphogenetic data analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test and Tukey’s HSD test (n = 30 per treatment); air-dried aerial parts (upper shoots) of in vitro-derived and wild-grown plants were compared phytochemically using GC–MS for compound identification and GC–FID for relative quantification based on peak-area normalization (n = 3 repeated analyses of each extract). The BAP (1.0 mg/L) + IAA (2.0 mg/L) combination produced both the highest shoot number (11.43 ± 0.20 shoots per explant) and the greatest shoot length (3.36 ± 0.05 cm) among the tested treatments. GC–MS identification and GC–FID relative quantification revealed a marked difference in phytochemical composition: the relative percentage of nerolidol was 45.4% in the optimized in vitro treatment, compared with 10.3% in wild-grown plants, while, in the hexane extracts, carvacrol showed its highest relative percentage in wild-grown plants (12.0%) and was not detected in the optimized in vitro treatment. These findings indicate that in vitro culture systems can serve not only as a tool for ex situ conservation but also as a controlled platform for characterizing differences in specialized metabolite profiles under defined culture conditions, providing a basis for further investigation into the biotechnological potential of S. pinardii.

Related

  1. Kombucha Fermentation Remodels the Phytochemical Composition of Gooseberry Juices and Reveals a Divergence Between Phenolic Abundance and HepG2 Cell Growth Inhibition
    Akshay K. Chandran, Gloria-Renate Klein, Joanna Kawa-Rygielska +7
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General biochemistryCrossref
  2. Cultivar-Dependent Phytochemical Composition and Cosmetic Potential of Grapevine Callus Cultures
    Marta Sharafan, Magdalena A. Malinowska, Arnaud Lanoue +4
    MoleculesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMC
  3. Comparative evaluation of culture systems for shoot propagation and phytochemical characteristics in pokeweed ( Phytolacca americana L.)
    Worasitikulya Taratima, Wipa Yaowachai, Attachai Trunjaruen +2
    PeerJPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossref
  4. Micropropagation of Lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn.) Using Meta-Topolin.
    Marco A Ramírez-Mosqueda, Alma Armenta-Medina, Obdulia Baltazar-Bernal +2
    Biotech (Basel (Switzerland))Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textMolecular biology & gene regulationEurope PMC
  5. Transcriptomic and Epigenetic Reprogramming in Solanum tuberosum L. Micropropagation: A Systematic Review of Elicitor-Driven Acclimatization and Scalable Biofactories
    Guillermo Alexander Jácome Sarchi, Stalin Aldair De La Cruz Sarchi, Jorge Ivan Mina Ortega +2
    International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMolecular biology & gene regulationCrossrefEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ustuner2026micropropagation,
  title = {{Micropropagation of the Endemic Stachys pinardii Boiss. and Comparative Investigation of the Phytochemical Composition of Cultured and Wild-Grown Plants}},
  author = {Hatice Üstüner},
  journal = {Molecules},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3390/molecules31203773},
  url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/20/3773},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Micropropagation of the Endemic Stachys pinardii Boiss. and Comparative Investigation of the Phytochemical Composition of Cultured and Wild-Grown Plants
AU  - Hatice Üstüner
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/21
JO  - Molecules
DO  - 10.3390/molecules31203773
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/31/20/3773
AB  - This study aimed to establish an efficient micropropagation protocol for the endemic plant Stachys pinardii Boiss. and to characterize differences in specialized metabolite profiles between in vitro-derived and wild plants under the tested conditions. Nodal explants were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with different cytokinin (BAP, KIN) and auxin (IAA, NAA) combinations, with morphogenetic data analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test and Tukey’s HSD test (n = 30 per treatment); air-dried aerial parts (upper shoots) of in vitro-derived and wild-grown plants were compared phytochemically using GC–MS for compound identification and GC–FID for relative quantification based on peak-area normalization (n = 3 repeated analyses of each extract). The BAP (1.0 mg/L) + IAA (2.0 mg/L) combination produced both the highest shoot number (11.43 ± 0.20 shoots per explant) and the greatest shoot length (3.36 ± 0.05 cm) among the tested treatments. GC–MS identification and GC–FID relative quantification revealed a marked difference in phytochemical composition: the relative percentage of nerolidol was 45.4% in the optimized in vitro treatment, compared with 10.3% in wild-grown plants, while, in the hexane extracts, carvacrol showed its highest relative percentage in wild-grown plants (12.0%) and was not detected in the optimized in vitro treatment. These findings indicate that in vitro culture systems can serve not only as a tool for ex situ conservation but also as a controlled platform for characterizing differences in specialized metabolite profiles under defined culture conditions, providing a basis for further investigation into the biotechnological potential of S. pinardii.
SN  - 1420-3049
ER  -