Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBrain and behavior

Neural Correlates of Moral Judgment in Dilemma Versus Non-Dilemma Contexts.

4 affiliations
  1. 1School of Psychology, Key Laboratory of Behavioral and Mental Health of Gansu Province, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China.
  2. 2Department of Education and Psychology, Academy of Wellness and Human Development, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
  3. 3Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (IAIC), Agency For Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
  4. 4Life Science Imaging Center, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.

Abstract

Purpose

Moral dilemmas have been extensively used to probe the hierarchy of moral preferences. However, human moral judgment frequently operates not only through competing principles but also in straightforward transgression contexts that do not constitute a dilemma. Consequently, it is unclear whether the moral circuitry is differentially engaged in dilemma-based versus non-dilemma-based moral processing.Method

We synthesized neuroimaging studies of dilemma-based moral tasks and non-dilemma moral tasks. Activation likelihood estimation revealed shared regions including the medial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction (TPJ).Findings

Non-dilemma tasks showed greater engagement of the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex, left orbitofrontal cortex, right temporal pole, and right precuneus, regions that have been implicated in affective valuation and rapid social appraisal. In contrast, moral dilemma tasks showed greater engagement of the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and bilateral TPJ, regions commonly associated with conflict monitoring and mental-state inference. Meta-analytical connectivity modeling indicated salience, default mode, and limbic network engagement during non-dilemma tasks, with additional central executive network recruitment during dilemma tasks. Activation network mapping revealed that both task types engage a common mesocorticolimbic connectivity network.Conclusion

These findings indicate that non-dilemma and dilemma-based moral tasks share a common neural core while showing differential patterns of regional involvement that may reflect their differing cognitive and affective demands.

Related

  1. Motivationally objective versus subjective decision-making: Neural correlates, behavior, and self-report
    P. Modak, J. W. Brown
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. Mechanisms and measurement of attention in laboratory tasks versus naturalistic learning contexts
    Fang Yu Chang, Xinyi Zoe Mao, Maya Khalil +5
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceCrossref
  3. Loneliness as a modulator of intersubject neural alignment across social and nonsocial contexts
    B. Jeong, M. J. Kim
    bioRxivPreprintCC BYFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  4. Loss contexts enhance dorsolateral prefrontal interpersonal neural synchrony during successful human deceptive recommendations
    Yaozhong Liu, Rui Huang, Xiaowei Gao +5
    Communications BiologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyDOAJ
  5. Multimodal neural correlates of cognitive awareness in aging and Alzheimer’s disease
    Federica Cacciamani, Marion Houot, Sophie Tezenas Du Montcel +3
    Neuroimage-ClinicalPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full text3 citedNeuroscienceHAL
BibTeX
@article{fu2026neural,
  title = {{Neural Correlates of Moral Judgment in Dilemma Versus Non-Dilemma Contexts.}},
  author = {Junjun Fu and Di Song and Serenella Tolomeo and Rongjun Yu},
  journal = {Brain and behavior},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/brb3.71864},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908177},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Neural Correlates of Moral Judgment in Dilemma Versus Non-Dilemma Contexts.
AU  - Junjun Fu
AU  - Di Song
AU  - Serenella Tolomeo
AU  - Rongjun Yu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - Brain and behavior
DO  - 10.1002/brb3.71864
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42908177
AB  - Purpose  Moral dilemmas have been extensively used to probe the hierarchy of moral preferences. However, human moral judgment frequently operates not only through competing principles but also in straightforward transgression contexts that do not constitute a dilemma. Consequently, it is unclear whether the moral circuitry is differentially engaged in dilemma-based versus non-dilemma-based moral processing.Method  We synthesized neuroimaging studies of dilemma-based moral tasks and non-dilemma moral tasks. Activation likelihood estimation revealed shared regions including the medial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction (TPJ).Findings  Non-dilemma tasks showed greater engagement of the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex, left orbitofrontal cortex, right temporal pole, and right precuneus, regions that have been implicated in affective valuation and rapid social appraisal. In contrast, moral dilemma tasks showed greater engagement of the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and bilateral TPJ, regions commonly associated with conflict monitoring and mental-state inference. Meta-analytical connectivity modeling indicated salience, default mode, and limbic network engagement during non-dilemma tasks, with additional central executive network recruitment during dilemma tasks. Activation network mapping revealed that both task types engage a common mesocorticolimbic connectivity network.Conclusion  These findings indicate that non-dilemma and dilemma-based moral tasks share a common neural core while showing differential patterns of regional involvement that may reflect their differing cognitive and affective demands.
SN  - 2162-3279
ER  -