Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
206,690 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Dynamic Smart Charging Through Integrated Agent-based Simulation and Optimization Modeling

Abstract

Coordinated electric vehicle (EV) charging can improve alignment between transportation operations and power-system conditions as electrification expands. This study develops an integrated simulation-optimization framework that embeds demand-aware charging (DAC) and grid-responsive charging, including unidirectional smart charging (V1G) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G), within an agent-based model, enabling dynamic feedback between optimized vehicle (dis)charging decisions and evolving transportation-system states. Using the Austin 6-county region, the framework evaluates 15,000 shared autonomous electric vehicles (SAEVs) under DAC, V1G, fleet-only V2G, and combined fleet-plus-household V2G. Results show coordinated strategies concentrate charging toward midday and provide selective evening discharge while maintaining service performance. Under favorable pricing, V2G reduces net CO2 emissions from 45 kg/SAEV/day under DAC to below 40 kg and lowers emission intensity by up to 14% to 0.14 kg per vehicle-mile traveled. DAC and V1G offer near-term options, whereas high V2G costs may hinder adoption. Realized benefits depend on tariffs, vehicle availability, and V2G maturity.

Related

  1. Mathematical modeling, simulation and optimization via (port-Hamiltonian) differential-algebraic equations
    Volker Mehrmann
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. Topology-Aware Integrated Sensing, Communication, Charging in Massive Low-Altitude Wireless Network
    Han Yu, Jiajun He, Zhaofeng Liu +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeneral mathematicsarXiv
  3. Nonlinear Trajectory Optimization Models for Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles with Mobile Charging Support
    Minsen Yuan, Amanuel Adane, James Humann +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling in Blimp
    Brian T Keller
    PsyArXivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textStatisticsOSF
  5. On The Relevance Of Using Temperature For Mechanical Fault Detection In Industrial Robots Based On Dynamic Modeling
    Sacha Clavel, Mazen Alamir, Julien Faure-Favre
    MechatronicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsFull textStatisticsHAL
BibTeX
@misc{su2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic Smart Charging Through Integrated Agent-based Simulation and Optimization Modeling}},
  author = {Lin Su and Kara M. Kockelman},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.08748},
  eprint = {2611.08748},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08748},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Dynamic Smart Charging Through Integrated Agent-based Simulation and Optimization Modeling
AU  - Lin Su
AU  - Kara M. Kockelman
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.08748
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08748
AB  - Coordinated electric vehicle (EV) charging can improve alignment between transportation operations and power-system conditions as electrification expands. This study develops an integrated simulation-optimization framework that embeds demand-aware charging (DAC) and grid-responsive charging, including unidirectional smart charging (V1G) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G), within an agent-based model, enabling dynamic feedback between optimized vehicle (dis)charging decisions and evolving transportation-system states. Using the Austin 6-county region, the framework evaluates 15,000 shared autonomous electric vehicles (SAEVs) under DAC, V1G, fleet-only V2G, and combined fleet-plus-household V2G. Results show coordinated strategies concentrate charging toward midday and provide selective evening discharge while maintaining service performance. Under favorable pricing, V2G reduces net CO2 emissions from 45 kg/SAEV/day under DAC to below 40 kg and lowers emission intensity by up to 14% to 0.14 kg per vehicle-mile traveled. DAC and V1G offer near-term options, whereas high V2G costs may hinder adoption. Realized benefits depend on tariffs, vehicle availability, and V2G maturity.
ER  -