Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Journal of Rural Studies

From the ambition of a living lab to a small step in participatory science: Agro-environmental living lab appropriation through the lens of Actor Network Theory (ANT)

Abstract

In the context of the current need for agricultural transition towards more sustainable systems and the general increase in participatory approaches in environmental studies, a living lab approach seems to be promising. Indeed, living laboratories are encouraged by the need for more co-constructed and transdisciplinary research involving scientists and societal stakeholders, in order to understand and implement agroecological measures in a more effective way than what could be reached by simply using experimental sites. Yet, living labs remain a broad concept with multiple understandings which may hinder their successful implementation. Via living labs developed by the research sector in five sites across Europe, our international research project investigates floral enrichment in wheat fields. We examined how different actors apprehended the living labs in an agroecological project by tracing the translation phases of the Actor Network Theory (ANT), in particular the problematization, interessement, and enrolment phases. Our results highlight the influence of research funding schemes in the use of the living lab approach and the importance of the interessement phase for both researchers' and farmers' further enrolment. Our results showcase the challenges of using this approach when actors’ objectives and willingness to use participatory approaches are not sufficiently shared. We then propose four recommendations: better align research policies with the exploratory nature of living labs; define a clear, shared scope to foster a common identity among actors; treat living labs as long-term approaches that allow actors to shape and redefine shared boundaries over time to sustain their enrolment; and recognise that the geographical location of living labs influences research questions, rather than the reverse.

Related

  1. Barriers to entry: A participatory science study of tick identification, monitoring, and physical barriers to reduce tick bites on horses
    Erika T. Machtinger, Karen C. Poh, Laura B. Kenny +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourPhysiologyPLOS
  2. ZOOJEU: Using Q fever to highlight a participatory science approach for fostering the co-design of management strategies for neglected zoonotic diseases
    Elsa Jourdain, Élodie Rousset, Émilie Ramillien +2
    PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthPLOSHALEurope PMC
  3. Framing just agroecological transitions through participatory multistakeholder processes
    Genowefa Blundo Canto, Vrindaja Vikram, Thomas Falk +10
    Outlook On AgriculturePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
  4. Looking through different lenses at meeting places in disadvantaged Dutch neighbourhoods: A qualitative participatory study assessing needs, barriers and success elements for women with non-Western migration backgrounds and teenage girls
    Geertje van Wijk, Louise T. C. Mulder, Suzanne van der Geest +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0EcologyNeurosciencePLOS
  5. Sustainable nutrition: integrating food systems, environmental science, and diet to advance public and planetary health
    Andrew A. Bremer, Anna Krans, Daniel J. Raiten
    Frontiers in NutritionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEcologyDOAJ
BibTeX
@article{agasse2026from,
  title = {{From the ambition of a living lab to a small step in participatory science: Agro-environmental living lab appropriation through the lens of Actor Network Theory (ANT)}},
  author = {C. Agasse and A. Nicolai and S Chollet and M. Herve and H. Vaskova and P. Saska and J. Skuhrovec and U. Fricke and S. Redlich and H. Chole and J. van Baaren and P. Boudes},
  journal = {Journal of Rural Studies},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104263},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05674351v1},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - From the ambition of a living lab to a small step in participatory science: Agro-environmental living lab appropriation through the lens of Actor Network Theory (ANT)
AU  - C. Agasse
AU  - A. Nicolai
AU  - S Chollet
AU  - M. Herve
AU  - H. Vaskova
AU  - P. Saska
AU  - J. Skuhrovec
AU  - U. Fricke
AU  - S. Redlich
AU  - H. Chole
AU  - J. van Baaren
AU  - P. Boudes
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Journal of Rural Studies
DO  - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104263
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05674351v1
AB  - In the context of the current need for agricultural transition towards more sustainable systems and the general increase in participatory approaches in environmental studies, a living lab approach seems to be promising. Indeed, living laboratories are encouraged by the need for more co-constructed and transdisciplinary research involving scientists and societal stakeholders, in order to understand and implement agroecological measures in a more effective way than what could be reached by simply using experimental sites. Yet, living labs remain a broad concept with multiple understandings which may hinder their successful implementation. Via living labs developed by the research sector in five sites across Europe, our international research project investigates floral enrichment in wheat fields. We examined how different actors apprehended the living labs in an agroecological project by tracing the translation phases of the Actor Network Theory (ANT), in particular the problematization, interessement, and enrolment phases. Our results highlight the influence of research funding schemes in the use of the living lab approach and the importance of the interessement phase for both researchers' and farmers' further enrolment. Our results showcase the challenges of using this approach when actors’ objectives and willingness to use participatory approaches are not sufficiently shared. We then propose four recommendations: better align research policies with the exploratory nature of living labs; define a clear, shared scope to foster a common identity among actors; treat living labs as long-term approaches that allow actors to shape and redefine shared boundaries over time to sustain their enrolment; and recognise that the geographical location of living labs influences research questions, rather than the reverse.
SN  - 0743-0167
ER  -