Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 57 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Looking through different lenses at meeting places in disadvantaged Dutch neighbourhoods: A qualitative participatory study assessing needs, barriers and success elements for women with non-Western migration backgrounds and teenage girls

  1. 1Department of Health, Louis Bolk Instituut, Bunnik, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Research, GGDrU, Zeist, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Objective: The living environment can significantly influence health negatively, particularly in disadvantaged neighbourhoods where risk factors and limited resources converge. Social cohesion and inclusive meeting places promote well-being, yet little is known about what makes these spaces accessible and meaningful for specific groups. This study explored how neighbourhood meeting places can better align with the needs of two often underrepresented groups: women with a non-Western migration background and teenage girls (12–18 years old), in four disadvantaged Dutch neighbourhoods. Methods: A qualitative participatory study was conducted in four municipalities in the Netherlands in March 2024 – June 2025. Data were collected through a neighbourhood orientation, focus groups, PhotoVoice, interviews, and validation sessions with neighbourhood workers, women, and girls, to assess the needs, barriers and success elements regarding meeting places. Thematic analysis was guided by the Movement Friendly Environment model, organizing data into four domains: physical design (hardware), social use (software), organizational structures (orgware), and perception (mindware). Results: In total, 97 participants contributed: 29 neighbourhood workers, 44 women, and 24 girls. The results, structured according to the four ‘wares,’ revealed a broad range of needs and experiences regarding meeting places. Women and girls valued clean, nearby, and welcoming public spaces with sufficient seating, safety, greenery and gender-sensitive design. Preferred activities included cooking, language learning, informal gatherings, and sports, ideally in familiar, culturally sensitive, and child-friendly settings. Ownership, trust and feelings of safety were important factors in fostering engagement. Barriers included unclear communication, language difficulties, lack of childcare, and feelings of unsafety. Neighbourhood workers played an important role in outreach, facilitation, and empowerment. Conclusion: Accessible, inclusive and meaningful meeting places for women and teenage girls emerge when physical, social, and organizational elements are aligned and mutually reinforcing, and are integrated with citizen’s perception, participation, engagement, and strong social networks.

Related

  1. Impacts of different SETD1A mutations and genetic backgrounds on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hippocampal neurons
    Y. Hong, T. Zhao, Q. Yang +15
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  2. From statements to model input data: Traceability and consistency of qualitative and quantitative scenarios in a participatory foresight exercise
    Lou Weidenfeld, Rémi Barbier, Sara Fernandez +1
    FuturesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textGeneral biologyHAL
  3. Patients as Co‐Researchers in Oncology: A Qualitative Exploration of Participatory Governance
    Yaël Busnel, Aline Rollet, Aline Cristiani +3
    Health ExpectationsPeer-reviewedCC BYGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHAL
  4. For Me, Quality of Life Is When I Get Through the Day Without Thinking: I Won't Make It: A Participatory Qualitative Study of Health‐Related Quality of Life in Rare Liver Diseases
    Anouck Alary, Jane Sattoe, Lynda Sifer-Rivière +15
    Health ExpectationsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedGeneral biologyHAL
  5. Do good neighbours compensate for bad climate? The case of sessile oak Quercus petraea in phylogenetically distant neighbourhoods
    Keliang Zhang, Vincent Jung, Maud Deniau +5
    OikosPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionHAL
BibTeX
@article{wijk2026looking,
  title = {{Looking through different lenses at meeting places in disadvantaged Dutch neighbourhoods: A qualitative participatory study assessing needs, barriers and success elements for women with non-Western migration backgrounds and teenage girls}},
  author = {Geertje van Wijk and Louise T. C. Mulder and Suzanne van der Geest and Annemarie Kapteijns and Marieke C. E. Battjes-Fries},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0356072},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356072},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Looking through different lenses at meeting places in disadvantaged Dutch neighbourhoods: A qualitative participatory study assessing needs, barriers and success elements for women with non-Western migration backgrounds and teenage girls
AU  - Geertje van Wijk
AU  - Louise T. C. Mulder
AU  - Suzanne van der Geest
AU  - Annemarie Kapteijns
AU  - Marieke C. E. Battjes-Fries
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/09
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0356072
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356072
AB  - Objective: The living environment can significantly influence health negatively, particularly in disadvantaged neighbourhoods where risk factors and limited resources converge. Social cohesion and inclusive meeting places promote well-being, yet little is known about what makes these spaces accessible and meaningful for specific groups. This study explored how neighbourhood meeting places can better align with the needs of two often underrepresented groups: women with a non-Western migration background and teenage girls (12–18 years old), in four disadvantaged Dutch neighbourhoods. Methods: A qualitative participatory study was conducted in four municipalities in the Netherlands in March 2024 – June 2025. Data were collected through a neighbourhood orientation, focus groups, PhotoVoice, interviews, and validation sessions with neighbourhood workers, women, and girls, to assess the needs, barriers and success elements regarding meeting places. Thematic analysis was guided by the Movement Friendly Environment model, organizing data into four domains: physical design (hardware), social use (software), organizational structures (orgware), and perception (mindware). Results: In total, 97 participants contributed: 29 neighbourhood workers, 44 women, and 24 girls. The results, structured according to the four ‘wares,’ revealed a broad range of needs and experiences regarding meeting places. Women and girls valued clean, nearby, and welcoming public spaces with sufficient seating, safety, greenery and gender-sensitive design. Preferred activities included cooking, language learning, informal gatherings, and sports, ideally in familiar, culturally sensitive, and child-friendly settings. Ownership, trust and feelings of safety were important factors in fostering engagement. Barriers included unclear communication, language difficulties, lack of childcare, and feelings of unsafety. Neighbourhood workers played an important role in outreach, facilitation, and empowerment. Conclusion: Accessible, inclusive and meaningful meeting places for women and teenage girls emerge when physical, social, and organizational elements are aligned and mutually reinforcing, and are integrated with citizen’s perception, participation, engagement, and strong social networks.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -