Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 20 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Co-designing a digital health resource for transgender and gender diverse older adults

  1. 1School of Nursing, University of Virginia
  2. 2Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) older adults in the United States (U.S.) face barriers to accessing health information and resources they need to make informed healthcare decisions. More resources are needed to promote their agency and preparedness to navigate an increasingly complex healthcare system and sociopolitical landscape. The purpose of this study was to develop a testable web-based resource to support informed healthcare decision-making for TGD older adults.

Methods: This multimethod co-design study integrated a human-centered design approach that centered the perspectives of TGD older adults in the research process. In the prototyping and testing phases of the study, TGD adults and multidisciplinary professionals from across the U.S. were enrolled to co-develop a web-based resource with the research team during individual and paired interviews. Participants also completed a demographic questionnaire and a website usability survey. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was used to identify design themes, which guided iterative prototyping of the web-based resource. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Complementary data from the usability survey and participant interviews were integrated in a joint display.

Results: A total of 27 participants, of whom 14 (52%) were TGD older adults, enrolled in the prototyping and testing phases. Analysis of qualitative data across both phases yielded five design themes that structured the development of a functional web-based resource: (1) Facilitating healthcare decisions through information and resources; (2) Organizing complex content with clarity and inclusivity; (3) Maintaining security, accessibility, and navigability; (4) Phasing rollout to communities and organizations; and (5) Planning for leadership, stewardship, and partnership. In the prototyping phase, three low- and mid-fidelity prototypes of a health information and resources website for TGD older adults were developed. In the testing phase, participants trialed a mid-fidelity prototype of the website, and their recommendations for improvements were integrated into a high-fidelity prototype for dissemination.

Conclusion: This study is one of few studies using participatory methods to engage TGD older adults in public health research. Through the development of a health information and resources website, this study demonstrates an innovative and feasible community-based co-design approach to addressing barriers affecting healthcare decision-making for TGD older adults.

Related

  1. Chronic pelvic and related genital pain in transgender and gender-diverse people: a scoping review
    Ragav Chona, Sami G. Sabbah, Marina Englesakis +5
    EClinicalMedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMCCrossref
  2. Confirmatory Validation of the Singing Incongruence and Gender (SInG) Scale in an Independent Sample of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Singers
    Logan Barrett
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textPsychiatry & mental healthOSF
  3. Development and validation of a digital learning resource quality evaluation framework: a mixed-methods study in health professions education
    Wenlong Cui, Yuan Zhang, Wenlin Dong +8
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. User-centered design and related participatory approaches in digital health innovations for low-resource settings: A scoping review protocol
    Emmanuel Otukpa, Abdhalla Ziraba, Christopher Pell +1
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceEpidemiology & public healthPLOS
  5. The Escalating Cost of Disinvestment in the Health of Transgender Youths—From Research Retrenchment to the Criminalization of Care
    Diana M. Tordoff, Alic G. Shook, Shelby Chestnut
    JAMA Network OpenPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{catlett2026codesigning,
  title = {{Co-designing a digital health resource for transgender and gender diverse older adults}},
  author = {Lauren Catlett and Crystal Chu and Noelle Marie Javier and Kimberly D. Acquaviva},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919463},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919463/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Co-designing a digital health resource for transgender and gender diverse older adults
AU  - Lauren Catlett
AU  - Crystal Chu
AU  - Noelle Marie Javier
AU  - Kimberly D. Acquaviva
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919463
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1919463/full
AB  - Introduction: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) older adults in the United States (U.S.) face barriers to accessing health information and resources they need to make informed healthcare decisions. More resources are needed to promote their agency and preparedness to navigate an increasingly complex healthcare system and sociopolitical landscape. The purpose of this study was to develop a testable web-based resource to support informed healthcare decision-making for TGD older adults.  Methods: This multimethod co-design study integrated a human-centered design approach that centered the perspectives of TGD older adults in the research process. In the prototyping and testing phases of the study, TGD adults and multidisciplinary professionals from across the U.S. were enrolled to co-develop a web-based resource with the research team during individual and paired interviews. Participants also completed a demographic questionnaire and a website usability survey. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was used to identify design themes, which guided iterative prototyping of the web-based resource. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Complementary data from the usability survey and participant interviews were integrated in a joint display.  Results: A total of 27 participants, of whom 14 (52%) were TGD older adults, enrolled in the prototyping and testing phases. Analysis of qualitative data across both phases yielded five design themes that structured the development of a functional web-based resource: (1) Facilitating healthcare decisions through information and resources; (2) Organizing complex content with clarity and inclusivity; (3) Maintaining security, accessibility, and navigability; (4) Phasing rollout to communities and organizations; and (5) Planning for leadership, stewardship, and partnership. In the prototyping phase, three low- and mid-fidelity prototypes of a health information and resources website for TGD older adults were developed. In the testing phase, participants trialed a mid-fidelity prototype of the website, and their recommendations for improvements were integrated into a high-fidelity prototype for dissemination.  Conclusion: This study is one of few studies using participatory methods to engage TGD older adults in public health research. Through the development of a health information and resources website, this study demonstrates an innovative and feasible community-based co-design approach to addressing barriers affecting healthcare decision-making for TGD older adults.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -