Function-Specific Profiles of Chronic Low Back Pain in Middle-Aged and Older Patients and Their Association with Standing Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment: A Cross-Sectional Study.
- 1Department of Pain Medicine, Aichi Medical University,1-1 Yazako Karimata, Nagakute 480-1195, Aichi, Japan.
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kochi Prefectural Hata Kenmin Hospital, Sukumo 788-0785, Kochi, Japan.
- 3Department of Orthopaedics, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazako Karimata, Nagakute 480-1195, Aichi, Japan.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Chronic low back pain (LBP) in older adults is usually quantified as a single global score, which may not reflect the activities in which pain actually limits the patient. This study described function-specific LBP profiles in middle-aged and older patients and examined their cross-sectional association with standing sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective observational study evaluated 102 patients with chronic LBP, categorized into Group M (under 75 years; n = 51) and Group O (75 years or older; n = 51). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were assessed during rest, getting up, rolling over, and walking (gait). An exploratory index, the proportional pain contribution (VAS%), was derived by expressing each phase as a percentage of the sum of the four scores; because the four values sum to 100% by definition, VAS% was interpreted only as a descriptor of the within-patient distribution of pain and always alongside the absolute scores. Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope and PI minus LL (PI-LL) were measured on standing radiographs. Results: Group M reported higher absolute pain than Group O at rest, on getting up and on rolling over (all p < 0.001), whereas absolute gait pain did not differ between the groups (p = 0.730). As a consequence of this pattern, Gait VAS% was higher in Group O (median 59.8% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001). Group O had lower LL (p = 0.001) and a larger PI-LL (p = 0.005); PI and PT did not differ significantly. Gait VAS% correlated with age (τ = 0.33) and PI-LL (τ = 0.29). In exploratory multivariable models, age and PI-LL were retained in the final model for Gait VAS% and were independently associated with it (β = 0.37 and 0.30 respectively; R² = 0.29). Conclusions: In this sample, the older patients reported less pain at rest and during postural transitions but similar pain during walking, so that walking accounted for a larger share of their total reported pain burden. This proportional pattern was associated with a larger standing PI-LL mismatch, although the association was modest. The findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating, and suggest that asking separately about pain during walking may add information that a single global score does not capture.
Related
- Association of salivary function with oral health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes and xerostomia: cross-sectional study
- Lung Ultrasound in Rheumatoid Arthritis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Association with Radiological Patterns, Lung Function Tests, and Disease Activity—A Single-Center Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study
- Association of S2 Alar–Iliac Versus S1-Only Fixation with Spinopelvic Mobility and Acetabular Component Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Standing–Sitting EOS Study
- Association of Visceral Adiposity, Core Skeletal Muscle Mass, Atherogenic Index of Plasma, and Renal Function (CKD-EPI) with Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study
- Association between cardiovascular disease risk and cognitive function in older adults based on the China-PAR model: a cross-sectional study
BibTeX
@article{morimoto2026functionspecific,
title = {{Function-Specific Profiles of Chronic Low Back Pain in Middle-Aged and Older Patients and Their Association with Standing Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment: A Cross-Sectional Study.}},
author = {Toru Morimoto and Tatsunori Ikemoto and Young-Chang Arai and Atsuhiko Hirasawa and Norimitsu Wakao},
journal = {Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/geriatrics11050144},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930023},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Function-Specific Profiles of Chronic Low Back Pain in Middle-Aged and Older Patients and Their Association with Standing Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment: A Cross-Sectional Study.
AU - Toru Morimoto
AU - Tatsunori Ikemoto
AU - Young-Chang Arai
AU - Atsuhiko Hirasawa
AU - Norimitsu Wakao
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)
DO - 10.3390/geriatrics11050144
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930023
AB - Background/Objectives: Chronic low back pain (LBP) in older adults is usually quantified as a single global score, which may not reflect the activities in which pain actually limits the patient. This study described function-specific LBP profiles in middle-aged and older patients and examined their cross-sectional association with standing sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective observational study evaluated 102 patients with chronic LBP, categorized into Group M (under 75 years; n = 51) and Group O (75 years or older; n = 51). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were assessed during rest, getting up, rolling over, and walking (gait). An exploratory index, the proportional pain contribution (VAS%), was derived by expressing each phase as a percentage of the sum of the four scores; because the four values sum to 100% by definition, VAS% was interpreted only as a descriptor of the within-patient distribution of pain and always alongside the absolute scores. Lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope and PI minus LL (PI-LL) were measured on standing radiographs. Results: Group M reported higher absolute pain than Group O at rest, on getting up and on rolling over (all p < 0.001), whereas absolute gait pain did not differ between the groups (p = 0.730). As a consequence of this pattern, Gait VAS% was higher in Group O (median 59.8% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001). Group O had lower LL (p = 0.001) and a larger PI-LL (p = 0.005); PI and PT did not differ significantly. Gait VAS% correlated with age (τ = 0.33) and PI-LL (τ = 0.29). In exploratory multivariable models, age and PI-LL were retained in the final model for Gait VAS% and were independently associated with it (β = 0.37 and 0.30 respectively; R² = 0.29). Conclusions: In this sample, the older patients reported less pain at rest and during postural transitions but similar pain during walking, so that walking accounted for a larger share of their total reported pain burden. This proportional pattern was associated with a larger standing PI-LL mismatch, although the association was modest. The findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating, and suggest that asking separately about pain during walking may add information that a single global score does not capture.
SN - 2308-3417
ER -