A Graphene Quantum-Dot Electrometer Array for Sub-Micrometre Imaging of Interfacial Charge Layers in Cryofixed Cells: A Design Analysis.
- 1Physics Department, Izmir Institute of Technology, 35430 İzmir, Türkiye.
- 2Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Leibniz-Institut im Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V., Hausvogteiplatz 5-7, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
- 3Vocational School, Istanbul Atlas University, Hamidiye, Anadolu Avenue No. 40, 34408 Istanbul, Türkiye.
Abstract
We analyse, as a design study, a cryogenic sensor that images the electrostatic stray field of a vitrified biological cell with an array of gate-defined quantum dots in gapped bilayer graphene. No device has been fabricated and no transport data are reported. The sensor is a Coulomb-blockade electrometer: each dot converts the offset charge induced on it by the sample into a shift in its resonance, and the steepness of that resonance-a property of the discrete density of states rather than of the device area-sets the gain, so that sensitivity is not lost as the element is made smaller. For a 50 nm dot at 4.2 K we estimate a charge sensitivity of order 10⁻² e/√Hz for a charge 50 nm away, limited by an assumed 1/f offset-charge noise; this is a calculated, not a measured, figure. Because a vitrified sample is electroneutral beyond the Debye length, the sensor does not see net charge but the frozen interfacial dipole layers, whose dipole density equals the permittivity times the potential step across each layer. The measured quantity is therefore a band-limited map of lateral variations in the interfacial potential within about 100 nm of the sensor; a laterally uniform layer is invisible. In this map the membrane potential enters with a weight β = Cmt/εwε₀ ≈ 0.07 relative to the surface potential of the glycocalyx, so the sensor is primarily a surface-potential imager and only secondarily, through a calibration we specify, a membrane-potential probe. A 10 mV surface-potential contrast at a period of 250 nm exceeds the 1 ms detection limit by a factor of about 4-13, and the 8 × 8 array at 250 nm pitch resolves periods of 250-300 nm. We give the device geometry, the plunge-freezing protocol, the controls and the inversion procedure, and list what remains to be measured.
Related
- Propagating edge and interfacial states in corrugated graphene: Robustness and configurability
- Electrolyte density, diffusivity and conductivity in graphene nanoconfinement predicted by separating interfacial from genuine confinement effects
- Observation and control of polariton noise in a thermal Rydberg atom electrometer
- Enhanced micrometre spatial resolution and usable photon flux for hybrid pixel detectors via deep-learning-based X-ray localization
- Interaction-driven dynamics in graphene flakes as a benchmark for quantum simulation
BibTeX
@article{celebi2026graphene,
title = {{A Graphene Quantum-Dot Electrometer Array for Sub-Micrometre Imaging of Interfacial Charge Layers in Cryofixed Cells: A Design Analysis.}},
author = {Cem Celebi and Stefan Ludwig and Afif Siddiki},
journal = {Biosensors},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/bios16100587},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930134},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - A Graphene Quantum-Dot Electrometer Array for Sub-Micrometre Imaging of Interfacial Charge Layers in Cryofixed Cells: A Design Analysis.
AU - Cem Celebi
AU - Stefan Ludwig
AU - Afif Siddiki
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/19
JO - Biosensors
DO - 10.3390/bios16100587
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42930134
AB - We analyse, as a design study, a cryogenic sensor that images the electrostatic stray field of a vitrified biological cell with an array of gate-defined quantum dots in gapped bilayer graphene. No device has been fabricated and no transport data are reported. The sensor is a Coulomb-blockade electrometer: each dot converts the offset charge induced on it by the sample into a shift in its resonance, and the steepness of that resonance-a property of the discrete density of states rather than of the device area-sets the gain, so that sensitivity is not lost as the element is made smaller. For a 50 nm dot at 4.2 K we estimate a charge sensitivity of order 10⁻² e/√Hz for a charge 50 nm away, limited by an assumed 1/f offset-charge noise; this is a calculated, not a measured, figure. Because a vitrified sample is electroneutral beyond the Debye length, the sensor does not see net charge but the frozen interfacial dipole layers, whose dipole density equals the permittivity times the potential step across each layer. The measured quantity is therefore a band-limited map of lateral variations in the interfacial potential within about 100 nm of the sensor; a laterally uniform layer is invisible. In this map the membrane potential enters with a weight β = Cmt/εwε₀ ≈ 0.07 relative to the surface potential of the glycocalyx, so the sensor is primarily a surface-potential imager and only secondarily, through a calibration we specify, a membrane-potential probe. A 10 mV surface-potential contrast at a period of 250 nm exceeds the 1 ms detection limit by a factor of about 4-13, and the 8 × 8 array at 250 nm pitch resolves periods of 250-300 nm. We give the device geometry, the plunge-freezing protocol, the controls and the inversion procedure, and list what remains to be measured.
SN - 2079-6374
ER -