No Evidence of an Effect of a Single Mirror Visual Feedback Session on Subsequent Motor Imagery
- 1Neurocognition and Functional Neurorehabilitation Group, Department of Psychology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) and mirror therapy, based on mirror visual feedback (MVF), are recommended as adjuncts to conventional therapies for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Both approaches activate sensorimotor cortical networks despite the absence of overt movement, and their concurrent application has been associated with enhanced neural activation. The present study investigated whether a single session of MVF modulates subsequent kinesthetic Motor Imagery (kMI)-related neural activity. EEG data from 38 healthy participants (MVF: n = 18; sham: n = 20) were analyzed in a mixed pre-post design. Participants performed kMI before and after either an MVF or sham intervention. Analyses focused on mu-band (8-12 Hz) event-related desynchronization (ERD) and its hemispheric lateralization. Although kMI reliably elicited stronger contralateral than ipsilateral mu ERD, MVF did not significantly affect subsequent kMI-related mu ERD or its hemispheric lateralization. These findings suggest that previously reported facilitatory effects of MVF on MI may be more closely related to concurrent application than to immediate aftereffects, while potential effects of repeated MVF exposure on subsequent MI remain to be investigated. These findings provide a foundation for future studies investigating how MVF and MI can be combined to optimize upper-limb stroke rehabilitation.
Related
- The Role of Visual Imagery in Face Recognition and Confidence Revisited: New Evidence from Aphantasia, Sampling Context Effects, and a Meta-Analysis
- Single-Case Design for Network-based BCI Rehabilitation: Individual Learning Trajectories and Effects of Motor Imagery Timing in Stroke Patients
- Acute neuromuscular and kinematic responses to a single Feldenkrais awareness through movement session.
- Evidence for decoder-label-regime-dependent effects of complementary leaky integrate-and-fire temporal-state decoding in motor-imagery EEG
- A robot-like learning companion for executive-function neurofeedback: acceptability, user experience, and evidence of within-session self-regulation in a pilot study
BibTeX
@misc{schwarz2026evidence,
title = {{No Evidence of an Effect of a Single Mirror Visual Feedback Session on Subsequent Motor Imagery}},
author = {L. J. Schwarz and A. Sterr and C. Kranczioch},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = nov,
doi = {10.64898/2026.11.05.763949},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.05.763949v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - No Evidence of an Effect of a Single Mirror Visual Feedback Session on Subsequent Motor Imagery
AU - L. J. Schwarz
AU - A. Sterr
AU - C. Kranczioch
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/11/05
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.11.05.763949
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.11.05.763949v1
AB - Motor imagery (MI) and mirror therapy, based on mirror visual feedback (MVF), are recommended as adjuncts to conventional therapies for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Both approaches activate sensorimotor cortical networks despite the absence of overt movement, and their concurrent application has been associated with enhanced neural activation. The present study investigated whether a single session of MVF modulates subsequent kinesthetic Motor Imagery (kMI)-related neural activity. EEG data from 38 healthy participants (MVF: n = 18; sham: n = 20) were analyzed in a mixed pre-post design. Participants performed kMI before and after either an MVF or sham intervention. Analyses focused on mu-band (8-12 Hz) event-related desynchronization (ERD) and its hemispheric lateralization. Although kMI reliably elicited stronger contralateral than ipsilateral mu ERD, MVF did not significantly affect subsequent kMI-related mu ERD or its hemispheric lateralization. These findings suggest that previously reported facilitatory effects of MVF on MI may be more closely related to concurrent application than to immediate aftereffects, while potential effects of repeated MVF exposure on subsequent MI remain to be investigated. These findings provide a foundation for future studies investigating how MVF and MI can be combined to optimize upper-limb stroke rehabilitation.
ER -