Acute effects of motor-cognitive injury-prevention warm-ups on unplanned jump-landing performance in team-sport athletes: A randomized crossover trial
5 affiliations
- 1Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- 2Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- 3Department of Sport, LUNEX, Differdange, Luxembourg
- 4Luxembourg Health and Sport Science Research Institute, Differdange, Luxembourg
- 5Medical Department, Eintracht Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Abstract
In team-sports, agility, perceptual-cognitive abilities, and executive functions are crucial for performance and injury prevention. Incorporating motor-cognitive demands into neuromuscular warm-ups may improve coping with cognitively demanding movement situations, requiring time-constrained decision-making and reactive responses. This randomized three-arm crossover study investigated the acute effects of the Prevent Injury and Enhance Performance (PEP) warm-up and two adapted motor-cognitive versions (PEP+; PEP-SKILLCOURT) on pre-planned (n = 6) and unplanned countermovement jump-landings, with the landing side cued only after take-off (n = 16). Eighteen team-sport athletes (age: 23 ± 3 years; height: 181 ± 11.4 cm; weight: 75.6 ± 10.4 kg; 5 females) completed the three warm-ups on separate days. PEP+ included cognitive exercises targeting visuomotor processing and executive functions. PEP-SKILLCOURT incorporated reactive agility exercises using the SKILLCOURT device. After each warm-up, participants performed the jump-landing task on a capacitive pressure plate. Landing performance was assessed using biomechanical and error-related outcomes, including peak vertical ground reaction force (pVGRF), time to pVGRF, center of pressure path length (CoP), time to stabilization (TTS), standing errors, and decision errors. Linear and generalized mixed models were used to analyze biomechanical outcomes and error counts, respectively, adjusting for flight time. No significant carryover effects occurred (p > .05). Landing condition significantly affected pVGRF and CoP (−4 to +17%, p = .003–.004) as well as error rates (p = .002). Post hoc tests indicated lower pVGRF, greater CoP fluctuations (p = .041 to <.001), and more errors (p = .037 to <.001) during unplanned landings. After Holm adjustment, no significant treatment or treatment × landing condition interaction effects remained. However, exploratory trends suggested lower landing loads and reduced CoP fluctuations after PEP+. Unplanned conditions resulted in poorer landing control and more erroneous landings, indicating reduced task performance. Larger trials are needed to confirm the exploratory trends favoring PEP+ and examine joint-specific biomechanics relevant to injury risk.
Related
- Long-chain Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation and cognitive performance throughout adulthood: A 6-month randomized controlled trial.
- Orange juice and hesperidin increase flavanone exposure without detectable short-term vascular benefits: a randomized crossover trial
- A randomized crossover trial with weighted blankets shows improvement in behavior and sleep outcomes in adults with Prader–Willi syndrome
- Short-term effects of an SGLT2 inhibitor on divalent ions in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a randomized crossover trial
- Modality- and sequence-specific effects of guided imagery on stress and neuroendocrine markers in young adults: A pilot randomized crossover study.
BibTeX
@article{laukhardt2026acute,
title = {{Acute effects of motor-cognitive injury-prevention warm-ups on unplanned jump-landing performance in team-sport athletes: A randomized crossover trial}},
author = {Felix Laukhardt and Lutz Vogt and Thorben Hülsdünker and Tobias Engeroff and Winfried Banzer and David Groneberg and Florian Giesche},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360379},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360379},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Acute effects of motor-cognitive injury-prevention warm-ups on unplanned jump-landing performance in team-sport athletes: A randomized crossover trial
AU - Felix Laukhardt
AU - Lutz Vogt
AU - Thorben Hülsdünker
AU - Tobias Engeroff
AU - Winfried Banzer
AU - David Groneberg
AU - Florian Giesche
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/09
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360379
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360379
AB - In team-sports, agility, perceptual-cognitive abilities, and executive functions are crucial for performance and injury prevention. Incorporating motor-cognitive demands into neuromuscular warm-ups may improve coping with cognitively demanding movement situations, requiring time-constrained decision-making and reactive responses. This randomized three-arm crossover study investigated the acute effects of the Prevent Injury and Enhance Performance (PEP) warm-up and two adapted motor-cognitive versions (PEP+; PEP-SKILLCOURT) on pre-planned (n = 6) and unplanned countermovement jump-landings, with the landing side cued only after take-off (n = 16). Eighteen team-sport athletes (age: 23 ± 3 years; height: 181 ± 11.4 cm; weight: 75.6 ± 10.4 kg; 5 females) completed the three warm-ups on separate days. PEP+ included cognitive exercises targeting visuomotor processing and executive functions. PEP-SKILLCOURT incorporated reactive agility exercises using the SKILLCOURT device. After each warm-up, participants performed the jump-landing task on a capacitive pressure plate. Landing performance was assessed using biomechanical and error-related outcomes, including peak vertical ground reaction force (pVGRF), time to pVGRF, center of pressure path length (CoP), time to stabilization (TTS), standing errors, and decision errors. Linear and generalized mixed models were used to analyze biomechanical outcomes and error counts, respectively, adjusting for flight time. No significant carryover effects occurred (p > .05). Landing condition significantly affected pVGRF and CoP (−4 to +17%, p = .003–.004) as well as error rates (p = .002). Post hoc tests indicated lower pVGRF, greater CoP fluctuations (p = .041 to <.001), and more errors (p = .037 to <.001) during unplanned landings. After Holm adjustment, no significant treatment or treatment × landing condition interaction effects remained. However, exploratory trends suggested lower landing loads and reduced CoP fluctuations after PEP+. Unplanned conditions resulted in poorer landing control and more erroneous landings, indicating reduced task performance. Larger trials are needed to confirm the exploratory trends favoring PEP+ and examine joint-specific biomechanics relevant to injury risk.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -