Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
174,684 studies31 sourcesUpdated 50 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Insights into Imaging

AI-accelerated compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon MRI: prospective validation of image quality and preliminary assessment of staging accuracy versus contrast-enhanced CT

Abstract

Objectives: To prospectively validate an AI-accelerated MRI protocol combining L₁-regularized compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon cancer staging, compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).

Materials and methods: This single-center study (August 2022–April 2024) enrolled 132 patients with pathologically confirmed colon cancer who underwent both 3.0-T non-contrast MRI and CECT within 1 week. Patients unable to complete an MRI were excluded. MRI sequences included T1- and T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. Image quality was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, alongside quantitative analysis of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and edge rise distance (ERD). Surgical pathology correlation was available for 33 cases. Five radiologists independently reviewed the images.

Results: Among 153 matched examination pairs from 132 patients (mean age, 58 ± 11 years), AI-MRI outperformed CECT in both qualitative and quantitative measures. MRI yielded higher image quality scores (4 [IQR 3–4] vs. 3 [IQR 3–3]), improved CNR (5.5 [IQR 4.2–7.0] vs. 1.3 [IQR 0.7–2.2]), and reduced ERD (1.6 mm [IQR 1.2–2.8] vs. 3.7 mm [IQR 2.8–5.0]). MRI provided superior peritoneal sharpness (75.8%) and colonic wall visualization (100%), and superior or equivalent tumor conspicuity (92.2%) and nodal assessment (86.9%), whereas CECT demonstrated better artifact control (45.1%). In preliminary analyses, MRI achieved higher T-staging accuracy (78.8% vs. 30.3%) and N-staging specificity (93.3% vs. 13.3%).

Conclusion: The AI-accelerated MRI protocol significantly outperformed CECT in image quality and preliminary staging accuracy for colon cancer evaluation while eliminating radiation exposure.

Key Points: Question Can an AI-accelerated MRI protocol provide superior image quality and staging performance compared with contrast-enhanced CT, which has limited diagnostic accuracy for colon cancer staging?

Findings AI-accelerated MRI using L₁-regularized compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction achieved superior image quality and higher preliminary staging accuracy than contrast-enhanced CT.

Critical Relevance Statement AI-accelerated MRI improves image quality and staging confidence without radiation exposure, supporting its potential to enhance preoperative assessment and clinical decision-making in colon cancer.

Related

  1. PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF OPTIMIZED COMPRESSED SENSING AND GRAPPA-ACCELERATED 3D-TOF-MRA FOR EVALUATION OF UNTREATED INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS AT 1.5 T: A NON-INFERIORITY STUDY
    C. G. Iacoban, H. Bösenberg, C. Klüner +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  2. ACCURACY OF COMPRESSED SENSING ACCELERATED 3D-FLAIR IN THE DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AT 1.5 T
    C. G. Iacoban, C. Klüner, H. Bösenberg +5
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textMedical imaging & radiologymedRxiv
  3. Performance of compressed-sensing cardiac accelerated cine MR in evaluating left ventricular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhaozhao Wang, Huihui Kong, Zekun Zhou +5
    BMC Medical ImagingPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyDOAJ
  4. Learning optimized sampling patterns for accelerated MRI reconstruction via diffusion models
    Sriram Ravula, Brett Levac, Yamin Arefeen +2
    Journal of Medical ImagingPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text9 citedMedical imaging & radiologyPMCOpenAlex
  5. Safety and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes of Integrating Engineered Synthetic Lipid Vesicles (Biosomes) in a Skin Booster Protocol: A Prospective Observational Study
    Antonella Franceschelli, Alessandra Procaccini, Deborah Subissati +3
    BiomedicinesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{guan2026aiaccelerated,
  title = {{AI-accelerated compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon MRI: prospective validation of image quality and preliminary assessment of staging accuracy versus contrast-enhanced CT}},
  author = {Zhen Guan and Nan Sun and Tian-Jing Chang and Xiao Zhang and Sha Liu and Zi-Ran Li and Jun Yang and Rui-Jia Sun and Xiao-Yan Zhang and Ying-Shi Sun},
  journal = {Insights into Imaging},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1186/s13244-026-02445-8},
  url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-026-02445-8},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - AI-accelerated compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon MRI: prospective validation of image quality and preliminary assessment of staging accuracy versus contrast-enhanced CT
AU  - Zhen Guan
AU  - Nan Sun
AU  - Tian-Jing Chang
AU  - Xiao Zhang
AU  - Sha Liu
AU  - Zi-Ran Li
AU  - Jun Yang
AU  - Rui-Jia Sun
AU  - Xiao-Yan Zhang
AU  - Ying-Shi Sun
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - Insights into Imaging
DO  - 10.1186/s13244-026-02445-8
UR  - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-026-02445-8
AB  - Objectives: To prospectively validate an AI-accelerated MRI protocol combining L₁-regularized compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon cancer staging, compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT).  Materials and methods: This single-center study (August 2022–April 2024) enrolled 132 patients with pathologically confirmed colon cancer who underwent both 3.0-T non-contrast MRI and CECT within 1 week. Patients unable to complete an MRI were excluded. MRI sequences included T1- and T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. Image quality was assessed using a 4-point Likert scale, alongside quantitative analysis of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and edge rise distance (ERD). Surgical pathology correlation was available for 33 cases. Five radiologists independently reviewed the images.  Results: Among 153 matched examination pairs from 132 patients (mean age, 58 ± 11 years), AI-MRI outperformed CECT in both qualitative and quantitative measures. MRI yielded higher image quality scores (4 [IQR 3–4] vs. 3 [IQR 3–3]), improved CNR (5.5 [IQR 4.2–7.0] vs. 1.3 [IQR 0.7–2.2]), and reduced ERD (1.6 mm [IQR 1.2–2.8] vs. 3.7 mm [IQR 2.8–5.0]). MRI provided superior peritoneal sharpness (75.8%) and colonic wall visualization (100%), and superior or equivalent tumor conspicuity (92.2%) and nodal assessment (86.9%), whereas CECT demonstrated better artifact control (45.1%). In preliminary analyses, MRI achieved higher T-staging accuracy (78.8% vs. 30.3%) and N-staging specificity (93.3% vs. 13.3%).  Conclusion: The AI-accelerated MRI protocol significantly outperformed CECT in image quality and preliminary staging accuracy for colon cancer evaluation while eliminating radiation exposure.  Key Points: Question Can an AI-accelerated MRI protocol provide superior image quality and staging performance compared with contrast-enhanced CT, which has limited diagnostic accuracy for colon cancer staging?  Findings AI-accelerated MRI using L₁-regularized compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction achieved superior image quality and higher preliminary staging accuracy than contrast-enhanced CT.  Critical Relevance Statement AI-accelerated MRI improves image quality and staging confidence without radiation exposure, supporting its potential to enhance preoperative assessment and clinical decision-making in colon cancer.
SN  - 1869-4101
ER  -