Performance of compressed-sensing cardiac accelerated cine MR in evaluating left ventricular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
- 2Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
- 3Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- 4Heart Health Research Center
- 5Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd.
Abstract
Objective To assess the consistency of left ventricular (LV) characteristics on cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images acquired from compressed-sensing (CS) accelerated cine versus standard segmented cine (Std-cine) sequences, both utilizing a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) readout. Materials & methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched for studies where both CS-cine and Std-cine sequences were performed for individual participants and LV characteristic data from the two sequences were reported separately. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility of the retrieved studies and extracted data. Key outcomes included LV ejection fraction (LVEF), volume, mass, and image quality. We performed subgroup analyses for children, breath control, arrhythmia, and MRI field intensity. Results Thirty-five studies were included. The LVEF (%) obtained from CS-cine imaging did not differ from that obtained from Std-cine imaging (standardized mean difference [SMD]: −0.05; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: −0.11, 0.01; p = 0.12; I2 = 0.0%). No other LV parameters differed (I2 = 0.0% to 0.0%), nor did heterogeneity differ across subgroups by MR field intensity, breath-hold requirements, children, or arrhythmia (for inter-subgroup heterogeneity, all p < 0.05). The overall image quality was comparable between the two sequences (SMD: −0.36; 95%CI: −0.65, 0.08; p < 0.05; I2 = 37%). The difference across participants with arrhythmias (SMD: −0.04; 95%CI: −1.26, 1.18; p = 0.95; I2 = 87%) and without arrhythmias (SMD: −0.63; 95%CI: −1.05, −0.21; p = 0.003; I2 = 91%) or with no relevant information on arrhythmias (SMD: −0.17; 95%CI: −0.51, 0.18; p = 0.35; I2 = 87%) may have accounted for the high heterogeneity. Conclusions CS-accelerated cine imaging and standard segmented cine imaging did not differ in their ability to evaluate LV characteristics. The CS-cine images quality was acceptable and superior to that of conventional cine images for arrhythmias. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022328219.
Related
- ACCURACY OF COMPRESSED SENSING ACCELERATED 3D-FLAIR IN THE DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AT 1.5 T
- PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF OPTIMIZED COMPRESSED SENSING AND GRAPPA-ACCELERATED 3D-TOF-MRA FOR EVALUATION OF UNTREATED INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS AT 1.5 T: A NON-INFERIORITY STUDY
- AI-accelerated compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction for colon MRI: prospective validation of image quality and preliminary assessment of staging accuracy versus contrast-enhanced CT
- Development and Population-Based Prognostic Utility Assessment of an ICD-10-CM-Based Prediction Model to Identify Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Discrimination Performance and Population-Based Evaluation in 83,357 Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Predictive value of cardiac magnetic resonance atrial and ventricular strain for adverse prognosis in patients with myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BibTeX
@article{wang2026performance,
title = {{Performance of compressed-sensing cardiac accelerated cine MR in evaluating left ventricular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis}},
author = {Zhaozhao Wang and Huihui Kong and Zekun Zhou and Anqi Yang and Zien Zhou and Chi Wang and Jing An and Yi He},
journal = {BMC Medical Imaging},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s12880-026-02522-w},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02522-w},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Performance of compressed-sensing cardiac accelerated cine MR in evaluating left ventricular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Zhaozhao Wang
AU - Huihui Kong
AU - Zekun Zhou
AU - Anqi Yang
AU - Zien Zhou
AU - Chi Wang
AU - Jing An
AU - Yi He
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - BMC Medical Imaging
DO - 10.1186/s12880-026-02522-w
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02522-w
AB - Objective To assess the consistency of left ventricular (LV) characteristics on cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images acquired from compressed-sensing (CS) accelerated cine versus standard segmented cine (Std-cine) sequences, both utilizing a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) readout. Materials & methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched for studies where both CS-cine and Std-cine sequences were performed for individual participants and LV characteristic data from the two sequences were reported separately. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility of the retrieved studies and extracted data. Key outcomes included LV ejection fraction (LVEF), volume, mass, and image quality. We performed subgroup analyses for children, breath control, arrhythmia, and MRI field intensity. Results Thirty-five studies were included. The LVEF (%) obtained from CS-cine imaging did not differ from that obtained from Std-cine imaging (standardized mean difference [SMD]: −0.05; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: −0.11, 0.01; p = 0.12; I2 = 0.0%). No other LV parameters differed (I2 = 0.0% to 0.0%), nor did heterogeneity differ across subgroups by MR field intensity, breath-hold requirements, children, or arrhythmia (for inter-subgroup heterogeneity, all p < 0.05). The overall image quality was comparable between the two sequences (SMD: −0.36; 95%CI: −0.65, 0.08; p < 0.05; I2 = 37%). The difference across participants with arrhythmias (SMD: −0.04; 95%CI: −1.26, 1.18; p = 0.95; I2 = 87%) and without arrhythmias (SMD: −0.63; 95%CI: −1.05, −0.21; p = 0.003; I2 = 91%) or with no relevant information on arrhythmias (SMD: −0.17; 95%CI: −0.51, 0.18; p = 0.35; I2 = 87%) may have accounted for the high heterogeneity. Conclusions CS-accelerated cine imaging and standard segmented cine imaging did not differ in their ability to evaluate LV characteristics. The CS-cine images quality was acceptable and superior to that of conventional cine images for arrhythmias. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022328219.
SN - 1471-2342
ER -