Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDEnvironmental science & technology

Defining a Healthy Microbiome of the Built Environment.

  1. 1Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina27599-7431, United States.
  2. 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina27708, United States.

Abstract

Built structures host complex and dynamic microbial communities whose assembly is shaped by occupancy, ventilation, building materials, cleaning practices, connections to outdoor environments, and other factors. These communities, collectively described as the microbiome of the built environment (MoBE), are increasingly recognized as critical to human health, yet there is currently no consensus definition of what constitutes a healthy MoBE. This gap impedes the development of engineering efforts to balance microbial diversity and immune support with the minimization of infectious disease risks. We propose three pillars that together define a healthy MoBE: (i) pathogens below context-specific risk thresholds; (ii) non-sterility, as sterility is likely to be suboptimal for human health in most contexts; and (iii) resilient diversity, as more diverse communities may resist pathogen colonization and recover more rapidly from perturbations. We synthesize evidence for each pillar, propose a framework for feedback-controlled MoBE engineering, and discuss how pillar priorities should be weighted across building types and occupant populations. We identify critical research priorities to advance actionable performance standards in support of healthy buildings.

Related

  1. Associations between community built environment and leisure-time physical activity among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haixin Li, Liping Zhong
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  2. Characterizing the association of neighborhood built-environment and type 2 diabetes-related clinical health outcomes: insights from the All of Us Research Program
    Emmanuella A. Asiedu, Jennifer Tjia, Jonggyu Baek +1
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  3. Longitudinal Associations between the Built Environment, Biological Aging and Cognition
    F. Sanders, V. Baltramonaityte, M. Staginnus +7
    medRxivPreprintCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthmedRxiv
  4. Built environment and emergency medical services response time in a high-density megacity: multilevel evidence from urban–suburban
    Jingwei Li, Hongjie Wu, Yujie Shen +3
    Frontiers in Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthFrontiersCrossref
  5. Importance of the Unseen: Near-Infrared Light Regulates Human Glucose Levels in the Built Environment
    K. Meihami, J. Unwin Teji, E. Barrett +1
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NC-NDFull textPhysiologybioRxiv
BibTeX
@article{brown2026defining,
  title = {{Defining a Healthy Microbiome of the Built Environment.}},
  author = {Joe Brown and Claudia Gunsch},
  journal = {Environmental science \& technology},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.1021/acs.est.6c05870},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42916434},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Defining a Healthy Microbiome of the Built Environment.
AU  - Joe Brown
AU  - Claudia Gunsch
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
JO  - Environmental science & technology
DO  - 10.1021/acs.est.6c05870
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42916434
AB  - Built structures host complex and dynamic microbial communities whose assembly is shaped by occupancy, ventilation, building materials, cleaning practices, connections to outdoor environments, and other factors. These communities, collectively described as the microbiome of the built environment (MoBE), are increasingly recognized as critical to human health, yet there is currently no consensus definition of what constitutes a healthy MoBE. This gap impedes the development of engineering efforts to balance microbial diversity and immune support with the minimization of infectious disease risks. We propose three pillars that together define a healthy MoBE: (i) pathogens below context-specific risk thresholds; (ii) non-sterility, as sterility is likely to be suboptimal for human health in most contexts; and (iii) resilient diversity, as more diverse communities may resist pathogen colonization and recover more rapidly from perturbations. We synthesize evidence for each pillar, propose a framework for feedback-controlled MoBE engineering, and discuss how pillar priorities should be weighted across building types and occupant populations. We identify critical research priorities to advance actionable performance standards in support of healthy buildings.
SN  - 0013-936X
SN  - 1520-5851
ER  -