Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 15 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

The reproducibility of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of post-ablation atrial scar: a cross-over study

2 more authors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has been used to visualise post-ablation atrial scar (PAAS), generally employing a three-dimensional (3D) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique. However the reproducibility of PAAS imaging has not been determined. This cross-over study is the first to investigate the reproducibility of the technique, crucial for both future research design and clinical implementation. METHODS: Forty subjects undergoing first time ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) had detailed CMR assessment of PAAS. Following baseline pre-ablation scan, two scans (separated by 48 h) were performed at three months post-ablation. Each scan session included 3D LGE acquisition at 10, 20 and 30 min post administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). Subjects were allocated at second scan post-ablation to identical imaging parameters ('Repro', n = 10), 3 T scanner ('3 T', n = 10), half-slice thickness ('Half-slice', n = 10) or half GBCA dose ('Half-gad', n = 10). PAAS was compared to baseline scar and then reproducibility was assessed for two measures of thresholded scar (% left atrial (LA) occupied by PAAS (%LA PAAS) and Pulmonary Vein Encirclement (PVE)), and then four measures of non-thresholded scar (point-by-point assessment of PAAS, four normalisation methods). Thresholded measures of PAAS were evaluated against procedural outcome (AF recurrence). RESULTS: A total of 271 3D acquisitions (out of maximum 280, 96.7%) were acquired. At 20 and 30 min, inter-scan reproducibility was good to excellent (coefficient of variation at 20 min and 30 min: %LA PAAS 0.41 and 0.20; PVE 0.13 and 0.04 respectively for 'Repro' group). Changes in imaging parameters, especially reduced GBCA dose, reduced inter-scan reproducibility, but for most measures remained good to excellent (ICC for %LA PAAS 0.454-0.825, PVE 0.618-0.809 at 30 min). For non-thresholded scar, highest reproducibility was observed using blood pool z-score normalisation technique: inter-scan ICC 0.759 (absolute agreement, 'Repro' group). There was no significant relationship between indices of PAAS and AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: PAAS imaging is a reproducible finding. Imaging should be performed at least 20 min post-GBCA injection, and a blood pool z-score should be considered for normalisation of signal intensities. The clinical implications of these findings remain to be established in the absence of a simple correlation with arrhythmia outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: United Kingdom National Research Ethics Service 08/H0802/68 - 30th September 2008.

Related

  1. Simultaneous multi slice (SMS) balanced steady state free precession first-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with iterative reconstruction at 1.5 T
    Muhummad Sohaib Nazir, Radhouene Neji, Peter Speier +9
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonancePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text50 citedSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
  2. Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration
    John Whitaker, Radhouene Neji, Nicholas Byrne +17
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonancePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text13 citedSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
  3. Invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (iCMR) for diagnostic right and left heart catheterization using an MR-conditional guidewire and passive visualization in congenital heart disease
    Surendranath Veeram Reddy, Yousef Arar, Riad Abou Zahr +11
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonancePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text50 citedSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
  4. Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Identified by Ensemble Learning Are Associated with Psychopathology
    E. Martin, K. Wu, X. Li
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Comment on "The utility of magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord in paediatric transverse myelitis: A systematic review
    Pierre Meyer
    Multiple Sclerosis and Related DisordersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{chubb2026reproducibility,
  title = {{The reproducibility of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of post-ablation atrial scar: a cross-over study}},
  author = {Henry Chubb and Rashed Karim and Sébastien Roujol and Marta Nuñez-Garcia and Steven Williams and John Whitaker and James Harrison and Constantine Butakoff and Oscar Camara and Amedeo Chiribiri and Tobias Schaeffter and Matthew Wright and Mark O'Neill and Reza Razavi},
  journal = {Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12968-018-0438-y},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05796047v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - The reproducibility of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of post-ablation atrial scar: a cross-over study
AU  - Henry Chubb
AU  - Rashed Karim
AU  - Sébastien Roujol
AU  - Marta Nuñez-Garcia
AU  - Steven Williams
AU  - John Whitaker
AU  - James Harrison
AU  - Constantine Butakoff
AU  - Oscar Camara
AU  - Amedeo Chiribiri
AU  - Tobias Schaeffter
AU  - Matthew Wright
AU  - Mark O'Neill
AU  - Reza Razavi
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
DO  - 10.1186/s12968-018-0438-y
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05796047v1
AB  - BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has been used to visualise post-ablation atrial scar (PAAS), generally employing a three-dimensional (3D) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique. However the reproducibility of PAAS imaging has not been determined. This cross-over study is the first to investigate the reproducibility of the technique, crucial for both future research design and clinical implementation. METHODS: Forty subjects undergoing first time ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) had detailed CMR assessment of PAAS. Following baseline pre-ablation scan, two scans (separated by 48 h) were performed at three months post-ablation. Each scan session included 3D LGE acquisition at 10, 20 and 30 min post administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). Subjects were allocated at second scan post-ablation to identical imaging parameters ('Repro', n = 10), 3 T scanner ('3 T', n = 10), half-slice thickness ('Half-slice', n = 10) or half GBCA dose ('Half-gad', n = 10). PAAS was compared to baseline scar and then reproducibility was assessed for two measures of thresholded scar (% left atrial (LA) occupied by PAAS (%LA PAAS) and Pulmonary Vein Encirclement (PVE)), and then four measures of non-thresholded scar (point-by-point assessment of PAAS, four normalisation methods). Thresholded measures of PAAS were evaluated against procedural outcome (AF recurrence). RESULTS: A total of 271 3D acquisitions (out of maximum 280, 96.7%) were acquired. At 20 and 30 min, inter-scan reproducibility was good to excellent (coefficient of variation at 20 min and 30 min: %LA PAAS 0.41 and 0.20; PVE 0.13 and 0.04 respectively for 'Repro' group). Changes in imaging parameters, especially reduced GBCA dose, reduced inter-scan reproducibility, but for most measures remained good to excellent (ICC for %LA PAAS 0.454-0.825, PVE 0.618-0.809 at 30 min). For non-thresholded scar, highest reproducibility was observed using blood pool z-score normalisation technique: inter-scan ICC 0.759 (absolute agreement, 'Repro' group). There was no significant relationship between indices of PAAS and AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: PAAS imaging is a reproducible finding. Imaging should be performed at least 20 min post-GBCA injection, and a blood pool z-score should be considered for normalisation of signal intensities. The clinical implications of these findings remain to be established in the absence of a simple correlation with arrhythmia outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: United Kingdom National Research Ethics Service 08/H0802/68 - 30th September 2008.
SN  - 1097-6647
SN  - 1532-429X
ER  -