Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 33 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration

8 more authors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ex-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has played an important role in the validation of in-vivo CMR characterization of pathological processes. However, comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging remains challenging due to shape changes occurring between the two states, which may be non-uniform across the diseased heart. A novel two-step process to facilitate registration between ex-vivo and in-vivo CMR was developed and evaluated in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Seven weeks after ischemia-reperfusion MI, 12 swine underwent in-vivo CMR imaging with late gadolinium enhancement followed by ex-vivo CMR 1 week later. Five animals comprised the control group, in which ex-vivo imaging was undertaken without any support in the LV cavity, 7 animals comprised the experimental group, in which a two-step registration optimization process was undertaken. The first step involved a heart specific flexible 3D printed scaffold generated from in-vivo CMR, which was used to maintain left ventricular (LV) shape during ex-vivo imaging. In the second step, a non-rigid co-registration algorithm was applied to align in-vivo and ex-vivo data. Tissue dimension changes between in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging were compared between the experimental and control group. In the experimental group, tissue compartment volumes and thickness were compared between in-vivo and ex-vivo data before and after non-rigid registration. The effectiveness of the alignment was assessed quantitatively using the DICE similarity coefficient. RESULTS: LV cavity volume changed more in the control group (ratio of cavity volume between ex-vivo and in-vivo imaging in control and experimental group 0.14 vs 0.56, p < 0.0001) and there was a significantly greater change in the short axis dimensions in the control group (ratio of short axis dimensions in control and experimental group 0.38 vs 0.79, p < 0.001). In the experimental group, prior to non-rigid co-registration the LV cavity contracted isotropically in the ex-vivo condition by less than 20% in each dimension. There was a significant proportional change in tissue thickness in the healthy myocardium (change = 29 ± 21%), but not in dense scar (change = - 2 ± 2%, p = 0.034). Following the non-rigid co-registration step of the process, the DICE similarity coefficients for the myocardium, LV cavity and scar were 0.93 (±0.02), 0.89 (±0.01) and 0.77 (±0.07) respectively and the myocardial tissue and LV cavity volumes had a ratio of 1.03 and 1.00 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of the morphological changes seen between the in-vivo and the ex-vivo LV differs between scar and healthy myocardium. A 3D printed flexible scaffold based on the in-vivo shape of the LV cavity is an effective strategy to minimize morphological changes in the ex-vivo LV. The subsequent non-rigid registration step further improved the co-registration and local comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo data.

Related

  1. Simultaneous multi slice (SMS) balanced steady state free precession first-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with iterative reconstruction at 1.5 T
    Muhummad Sohaib Nazir, Radhouene Neji, Peter Speier +9
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonancePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text50 citedSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
  2. The reproducibility of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of post-ablation atrial scar: a cross-over study
    Henry Chubb, Rashed Karim, Sébastien Roujol +11
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonancePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text61 citedSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
  3. Invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (iCMR) for diagnostic right and left heart catheterization using an MR-conditional guidewire and passive visualization in congenital heart disease
    Surendranath Veeram Reddy, Yousef Arar, Riad Abou Zahr +11
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonancePeer-reviewedCC BYFull text50 citedSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
  4. Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Identified by Ensemble Learning Are Associated with Psychopathology
    E. Martin, K. Wu, X. Li
    bioRxivPreprintAll rights reservedFull textNeurosciencebioRxiv
  5. Comment on "The utility of magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord in paediatric transverse myelitis: A systematic review
    Pierre Meyer
    Multiple Sclerosis and Related DisordersPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceSystems & synthetic biologyHAL
BibTeX
@article{whitaker2026improved,
  title = {{Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration}},
  author = {John Whitaker and Radhouene Neji and Nicholas Byrne and Esther Puyol-Antón and Rahul Mukherjee and Steven Williams and Henry Chubb and Louisa O'Neill and Orod Razeghi and Adam Connolly and Kawal Rhode and Steven Niederer and Andrew King and Cory Tschabrunn and Elad Anter and Reza Nezafat and Martin Bishop and Mark O'Neill and Reza Razavi and Sébastien Roujol},
  journal = {Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12968-019-0574-z},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05796025v1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration
AU  - John Whitaker
AU  - Radhouene Neji
AU  - Nicholas Byrne
AU  - Esther Puyol-Antón
AU  - Rahul Mukherjee
AU  - Steven Williams
AU  - Henry Chubb
AU  - Louisa O'Neill
AU  - Orod Razeghi
AU  - Adam Connolly
AU  - Kawal Rhode
AU  - Steven Niederer
AU  - Andrew King
AU  - Cory Tschabrunn
AU  - Elad Anter
AU  - Reza Nezafat
AU  - Martin Bishop
AU  - Mark O'Neill
AU  - Reza Razavi
AU  - Sébastien Roujol
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
DO  - 10.1186/s12968-019-0574-z
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05796025v1
AB  - BACKGROUND: Ex-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has played an important role in the validation of in-vivo CMR characterization of pathological processes. However, comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging remains challenging due to shape changes occurring between the two states, which may be non-uniform across the diseased heart. A novel two-step process to facilitate registration between ex-vivo and in-vivo CMR was developed and evaluated in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: Seven weeks after ischemia-reperfusion MI, 12 swine underwent in-vivo CMR imaging with late gadolinium enhancement followed by ex-vivo CMR 1 week later. Five animals comprised the control group, in which ex-vivo imaging was undertaken without any support in the LV cavity, 7 animals comprised the experimental group, in which a two-step registration optimization process was undertaken. The first step involved a heart specific flexible 3D printed scaffold generated from in-vivo CMR, which was used to maintain left ventricular (LV) shape during ex-vivo imaging. In the second step, a non-rigid co-registration algorithm was applied to align in-vivo and ex-vivo data. Tissue dimension changes between in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging were compared between the experimental and control group. In the experimental group, tissue compartment volumes and thickness were compared between in-vivo and ex-vivo data before and after non-rigid registration. The effectiveness of the alignment was assessed quantitatively using the DICE similarity coefficient. RESULTS: LV cavity volume changed more in the control group (ratio of cavity volume between ex-vivo and in-vivo imaging in control and experimental group 0.14 vs 0.56, p < 0.0001) and there was a significantly greater change in the short axis dimensions in the control group (ratio of short axis dimensions in control and experimental group 0.38 vs 0.79, p < 0.001). In the experimental group, prior to non-rigid co-registration the LV cavity contracted isotropically in the ex-vivo condition by less than 20% in each dimension. There was a significant proportional change in tissue thickness in the healthy myocardium (change = 29 ± 21%), but not in dense scar (change = - 2 ± 2%, p = 0.034). Following the non-rigid co-registration step of the process, the DICE similarity coefficients for the myocardium, LV cavity and scar were 0.93 (±0.02), 0.89 (±0.01) and 0.77 (±0.07) respectively and the myocardial tissue and LV cavity volumes had a ratio of 1.03 and 1.00 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of the morphological changes seen between the in-vivo and the ex-vivo LV differs between scar and healthy myocardium. A 3D printed flexible scaffold based on the in-vivo shape of the LV cavity is an effective strategy to minimize morphological changes in the ex-vivo LV. The subsequent non-rigid registration step further improved the co-registration and local comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo data.
SN  - 1097-6647
SN  - 1532-429X
ER  -