Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
182,460 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Plasma concentrations of nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir required for inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication differ between rhesus macaques and humans

  1. 1Vaccine and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
  2. 2Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Abstract

Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, non-human primate (NHP) infection models emerged as highly useful tools for preclinical screening of antiviral drugs. However, it is uncertain whether NHP models can be used to precisely inform optimal dosing in humans. We previously established and validated mathematical models, which were fit to SARS-CoV-2 viral loads from human clinical trials. These models identified that plasma drug concentrations required to inhibit viral replication by 50% in humans (in vivo EC50) differ substantially from in vitro EC50 estimates in cell culture systems. Here, we apply models to sequential viral load data from SARS-CoV-2 infected rhesus macaques (RMs) that were untreated or treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, or both drugs. We identify that equivalent plasma drug concentrations correspond to greater antiviral potency in the lungs compared with nasal passages for nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir. Average nirmatrelvir antiviral efficacy in RM (30% in nasal passages and 46% in the lungs) was estimated to be less than in humans (82%) due to shorter plasma drug half-life. Molnupiravir efficacy in RMs (95% in nasal and 99% in the lungs) is estimated to be similar to efficacy in humans against omicron variants. Our model estimates that 10-fold higher plasma nirmatelvir concentrations are needed in humans versus RMs to achieve 50% reduction in viral replication, whereas 20-fold lower plasma molnupiravir concentrations are needed. Our results suggest that dose optimization in humans based on modeling of NHP viral loads is limited by drug-specific differences in pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and virologic profiles, and that data from human phase 1 and 2 trials are better suited for this task.

Related

  1. Interaction of Bunyamwera virus non-structural protein NSm with cellular BNIP1 is required for efficient viral gene expression and replication
    Rosalind F. Wartnaby, Juan Fontana, John N. Barr
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textInfectious diseaseCrossref
  2. Antiviral Sesquiterpene Lactones from Laurus nobilis L.: Inhibition of Hepatitis C Virus and Dengue Virus Replication.
    Yhiya Amen, Marwa Elsbaey, George Mpekoulis +5
    VirusesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  3. Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir and Subsequent PCR Negativity in Patients With B-Cell Lymphoma and Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 PCR Positivity: A Case Series.
    Yutaka Natori, Hideyoshi Noji, Akiko Shichishima-Nakamura +2
    EJHaemPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCDOAJ
  4. Effects and infection risks of baricitinib in combination with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in elderly patients with severe or critical COVID-19: a retrospective observational cohort study.
    Ling Xu, Yongzhe Liu, Ran Li +6
    BMC infectious diseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCPMC
  5. Medico-legal integration of molnupiravir rapid deployment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Emergency use authorization, clinical evidence, and risk of viral mutagenesis
    Tung-Hu Tsai
    One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{leon2026plasma,
  title = {{Plasma concentrations of nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir required for inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication differ between rhesus macaques and humans}},
  author = {Ugo Avila-Ponce de Leon and Shadisadat Esmaeili and Katherine Owens and Joshua T. Schiffer},
  journal = {Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1128/aac.00307-26},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00307-26},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Plasma concentrations of nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir required for inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication differ between rhesus macaques and humans
AU  - Ugo Avila-Ponce de Leon
AU  - Shadisadat Esmaeili
AU  - Katherine Owens
AU  - Joshua T. Schiffer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/05
JO  - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
DO  - 10.1128/aac.00307-26
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00307-26
AB  - Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, non-human primate (NHP) infection models emerged as highly useful tools for preclinical screening of antiviral drugs. However, it is uncertain whether NHP models can be used to precisely inform optimal dosing in humans. We previously established and validated mathematical models, which were fit to SARS-CoV-2 viral loads from human clinical trials. These models identified that plasma drug concentrations required to inhibit viral replication by 50% in humans (in vivo EC50) differ substantially from in vitro EC50 estimates in cell culture systems. Here, we apply models to sequential viral load data from SARS-CoV-2 infected rhesus macaques (RMs) that were untreated or treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir, or both drugs. We identify that equivalent plasma drug concentrations correspond to greater antiviral potency in the lungs compared with nasal passages for nirmatrelvir and molnupiravir. Average nirmatrelvir antiviral efficacy in RM (30% in nasal passages and 46% in the lungs) was estimated to be less than in humans (82%) due to shorter plasma drug half-life. Molnupiravir efficacy in RMs (95% in nasal and 99% in the lungs) is estimated to be similar to efficacy in humans against omicron variants. Our model estimates that 10-fold higher plasma nirmatelvir concentrations are needed in humans versus RMs to achieve 50% reduction in viral replication, whereas 20-fold lower plasma molnupiravir concentrations are needed. Our results suggest that dose optimization in humans based on modeling of NHP viral loads is limited by drug-specific differences in pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and virologic profiles, and that data from human phase 1 and 2 trials are better suited for this task.
SN  - 0066-4804
SN  - 1098-6596
ER  -