Time-segmented, feedback-guided tiered warming during radical esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study
- 1Department of Operating Room, The affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University , , ,
- 2Department of Anesthesiology, The affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University , , ,
- 3Department of Neurology, The affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University , , ,
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether a protocolized intraoperative temperature-management strategy based on time-segmented warning thresholds and tiered, feedback-guided warming interventions reduces hypothermia and improves early postoperative recovery in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy.
Methods: This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included 116 adults who underwent elective radical esophagectomy at The affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between August 2024 and January 2026 and were managed with either a time-segmented, feedback-guided tiered warming protocol (n = 58) or conventional warming (n = 58). Core temperature was monitored continuously with a lower esophageal probe until the start of esophageal mobilization and with a nasopharyngeal probe thereafter, and was recorded every 15 min. All warming adjustments were implemented manually by the clinical team according to predefined thresholds. The primary endpoint was intraoperative hypothermia, defined as a core temperature below 36 °C at any time from incision to skin closure. Secondary endpoints included severe hypothermia, nadir temperature, hypothermia burden, postoperative shivering, time to extubation, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time, coagulation indices, 30-day complications, length of stay, and hospital cost.
Results: Intraoperative hypothermia occurred in 53 of 58 control patients (91.4%) and 5 of 58 intervention patients (8.6%) (risk ratio 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.22; P < 0.001). Severe hypothermia below 35.5 °C developed in 27 control patients (46.6%) and in none of the intervention patients. Median nadir core temperature was 35.55 °C in the control group and 36.27 °C in the intervention group (P < 0.001). Compared with conventional warming, the protocol reduced postoperative shivering (5.2% vs 51.7%), shortened time to extubation by 8.9 min, lowered the rate of any postoperative complication (34.5% vs 62.1%; P = 0.005), shortened hospital stay (12.2 vs 13.5 days; P = 0.010), and reduced mean in-hospital cost by 8,911 CNY (P < 0.001). The treatment effect was materially unchanged in adjusted analyses using Firth penalized logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 0.004, 95% CI 0.000-0.024) and modified Poisson regression (adjusted risk ratio 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.23).
Conclusion: In adults undergoing radical esophagectomy, a time-segmented, feedback-guided tiered warming protocol substantially reduced intraoperative hypothermia and was associated with faster early recovery, fewer postoperative complications, shorter hospitalization, and lower cost. Because the intervention was a multicomponent warming bundle, the contributions of its individual components cannot be separated, and the associations with complications, hospital stay, and cost should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. The protocol uses standard perioperative equipment and can be implemented without specialized hardware.
Related
- Endoscopic accessibility and conduit passage after retrosternal vs. posterior mediastinal gastric conduit reconstruction following McKeown esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study
- Short-term clinical outcomes of nasoduodenal tube versus feeding jejunostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study with exploratory microbiome analysis
- Global Warming and Type 2 Diabetes: Sex and Gender as Drivers in a Multidimensional Feedback Loop.
- Comparison of Respiratory function recovery after esophagectomy: a retrospective analysis of surgical approaches
- Sequential chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical resection of stage IA2–IIA1 cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study
BibTeX
@article{liu2026timesegmented,
title = {{Time-segmented, feedback-guided tiered warming during radical esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study}},
author = {Yanshu Liu and Jianlan Ren and Lu Xiao and Juan Wang and Ling Wang and Yu Yi and Jie Cheng and Min Hu},
journal = {Frontiers in oncology},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.3389/fonc.2026.1920051},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661368},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Time-segmented, feedback-guided tiered warming during radical esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study
AU - Yanshu Liu
AU - Jianlan Ren
AU - Lu Xiao
AU - Juan Wang
AU - Ling Wang
AU - Yu Yi
AU - Jie Cheng
AU - Min Hu
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/30
JO - Frontiers in oncology
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2026.1920051
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13661368
AB - Objective: To evaluate whether a protocolized intraoperative temperature-management strategy based on time-segmented warning thresholds and tiered, feedback-guided warming interventions reduces hypothermia and improves early postoperative recovery in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy. Methods: This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included 116 adults who underwent elective radical esophagectomy at The affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between August 2024 and January 2026 and were managed with either a time-segmented, feedback-guided tiered warming protocol (n = 58) or conventional warming (n = 58). Core temperature was monitored continuously with a lower esophageal probe until the start of esophageal mobilization and with a nasopharyngeal probe thereafter, and was recorded every 15 min. All warming adjustments were implemented manually by the clinical team according to predefined thresholds. The primary endpoint was intraoperative hypothermia, defined as a core temperature below 36 °C at any time from incision to skin closure. Secondary endpoints included severe hypothermia, nadir temperature, hypothermia burden, postoperative shivering, time to extubation, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time, coagulation indices, 30-day complications, length of stay, and hospital cost. Results: Intraoperative hypothermia occurred in 53 of 58 control patients (91.4%) and 5 of 58 intervention patients (8.6%) (risk ratio 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.22; P < 0.001). Severe hypothermia below 35.5 °C developed in 27 control patients (46.6%) and in none of the intervention patients. Median nadir core temperature was 35.55 °C in the control group and 36.27 °C in the intervention group (P < 0.001). Compared with conventional warming, the protocol reduced postoperative shivering (5.2% vs 51.7%), shortened time to extubation by 8.9 min, lowered the rate of any postoperative complication (34.5% vs 62.1%; P = 0.005), shortened hospital stay (12.2 vs 13.5 days; P = 0.010), and reduced mean in-hospital cost by 8,911 CNY (P < 0.001). The treatment effect was materially unchanged in adjusted analyses using Firth penalized logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio 0.004, 95% CI 0.000-0.024) and modified Poisson regression (adjusted risk ratio 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.23). Conclusion: In adults undergoing radical esophagectomy, a time-segmented, feedback-guided tiered warming protocol substantially reduced intraoperative hypothermia and was associated with faster early recovery, fewer postoperative complications, shorter hospitalization, and lower cost. Because the intervention was a multicomponent warming bundle, the contributions of its individual components cannot be separated, and the associations with complications, hospital stay, and cost should be regarded as hypothesis-generating. The protocol uses standard perioperative equipment and can be implemented without specialized hardware.
SN - 2234-943X
ER -