Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated 48 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYMolecules

Electrochemical Sensors for Pesticide Residue Detection

  1. 1Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China
  2. 2College of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Hubei Minzu University, Enshi 445000, China

Abstract

Electrochemical sensors have emerged as promising tools for rapid pesticide screening in food and environmental samples because they combine simple instrumentation, fast response, portability, and compatibility with disposable electrodes. This review organizes recent progress through a cross-system framework linking pesticide class, interfacial electrochemical process, and material design. Carbon materials, metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives, metal nanoparticles, metal compounds, conducting polymers, MXene-based composites, and selected emerging materials are compared in terms of enrichment capability, charge-transfer regulation, catalytic amplification, recognition-layer integration, and suitability for real-sample analysis. Emphasis is placed on issues that are often under-discussed in performance-centered surveys, including matrix interference, electrode fouling, batch-to-batch reproducibility, storage stability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. Representative examples show that the most useful advances arise not simply from lowering the limit of detection but from improving structure-function understanding and translating interfacial design into robust analytical performance. Future work should prioritize standardized fabrication and benchmarking protocols, in situ and operando identification of active sites and interface evolution, matrix-specific antifouling validation, multiresidue and metabolite analysis, and hybrid portable devices coupled with intelligent readout.

Related

  1. Redox chemistry, catalysis, and electrochemical detection of periodate species: sensors, mechanisms, and applications in green chemistry
    Ruba Alrajhi, Fatehy M Abdel-Haleem, Mikhael Bechelany +1
    Frontiers in ChemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedGeneral chemistryHAL
  2. A selective review of LC–MS/MS-based pesticide residue analysis (2020–2025): advances in QuEChERS methods, multi-matrix applications, and analytical validation
    S. Kathirvel, Naba Fathima, Sana Fathima +2
    Sustainable Chemistry for Climate ActionPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral chemistryEnvironmental science & pollutionDOAJ
  3. The influence of surface functionalization and signal transduction on electrochemical aptamer-based sensors
    Teodora Lupoi, Yann R. Leroux, Florence Geneste
    Current Opinion in ElectrochemistryPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSystems & synthetic biologyGeneral chemistryHAL
  4. Metal Compound‐Based Non‐Enzymatic Electrochemical Cholesterol Sensors: Emerging Materials and Mechanistic Insights
    Longfei (Jack) Yin, Chao‐Tsen (Rora) Chen, Jacopo Giaretta +4
    Advanced Materials InterfacesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textAnalytical chemistryDOAJ
  5. Rigorous Benchmarking of Continuous Dry-Printed CNT Networks as High-Performance Electrochemical Sensors
    Eero Gustafsson, Laura Ferrer Pascual, Olli Kokko +5
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral chemistryCrossref
BibTeX
@article{sun2026electrochemical,
  title = {{Electrochemical Sensors for Pesticide Residue Detection}},
  author = {Jiabin Sun and Xinjian Song and Yu Zhang},
  journal = {Molecules},
  year = {2026},
  month = may,
  doi = {10.3390/molecules31101743},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31101743},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Electrochemical Sensors for Pesticide Residue Detection
AU  - Jiabin Sun
AU  - Xinjian Song
AU  - Yu Zhang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/20
JO  - Molecules
DO  - 10.3390/molecules31101743
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31101743
AB  - Electrochemical sensors have emerged as promising tools for rapid pesticide screening in food and environmental samples because they combine simple instrumentation, fast response, portability, and compatibility with disposable electrodes. This review organizes recent progress through a cross-system framework linking pesticide class, interfacial electrochemical process, and material design. Carbon materials, metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives, metal nanoparticles, metal compounds, conducting polymers, MXene-based composites, and selected emerging materials are compared in terms of enrichment capability, charge-transfer regulation, catalytic amplification, recognition-layer integration, and suitability for real-sample analysis. Emphasis is placed on issues that are often under-discussed in performance-centered surveys, including matrix interference, electrode fouling, batch-to-batch reproducibility, storage stability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. Representative examples show that the most useful advances arise not simply from lowering the limit of detection but from improving structure-function understanding and translating interfacial design into robust analytical performance. Future work should prioritize standardized fabrication and benchmarking protocols, in situ and operando identification of active sites and interface evolution, matrix-specific antifouling validation, multiresidue and metabolite analysis, and hybrid portable devices coupled with intelligent readout.
SN  - 1420-3049
SN  - 1433-1373
ER  -